Enjoy or whatever.
Video Questionnaire
Enjoy or whatever.
Wow. This is a diamond in the rough. ILI-Ni 5w4 sx/sp
You remind me of a former forum member, Scapegrace. I think she self typed ILI but I am not sure. I think ILI is good but you can also check SLI. You can find a lot of descriptions of both in articles section. You don't seem new to this though...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Watched for ten seconds with the sound off. Gamma something, will revisit.
@Floozy — ILI. That’s my overall impression based on answers, mannerisms, looks; specifically you do this thing that I’ve only seen ILI’s do. You kind of blow air out the sides of your mouth (reverse sigh?) while smiling or else smiling immediately after. It’s very hard to describe but it’s kind of a scoffing, stifled laugh. I can go back later if you’re curious and pinpoint the time stamps for the two times you do it. I know it seems like an odd thing to draw attention to, especially since I would say your expressions are pretty generally more deadpan, but I dated an ILI (DCNH subtype D) for a year and although he had a bit higher energy due to his subtype, he also did that unique physical behavior.
mb IEI
As soon as I saw her video. I knew you would say that based on some of the people you typed IEI before. I think I am catching on to the visual traits you look for.Originally Posted by Sol
I am saying this because I also thought IEI for a moment, until I listened to the whole video.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Nah. You just have guessed.
"Knew", "guessed", whatever. I am seeing something. I will figure it out. lolNah. You just have guessed.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
^ for a very obvious IEI to a trained eye like mine is supposed to give you credibility in not being able to identify functions in others and blame me for knowing what i'm doing?? i showed you exactly where the Fe was
my advice... stop typing people based on what other people do
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 03-22-2019 at 10:06 AM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Your first paragraph is untillegible.
And no one is asking for your advice.
Trained eye. Lol. What, did you go to socionics university? No. I think you must mean posting on this forum.
I’ve been a memeber of this forum since I was 13. I’m now 29. I believe that makes me a bigger expert.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
@Sol, where is the Fe??????
to distinguish types nonverbal needs some skills
though I suspect IEI, but not sure still
Where is Fe in nonverbal or verbal?
I have been attempting to type in socionics since early 2000’s, and by now I will say I am not too bad at it. It is also easier to type within one’s own Quadra, as I am sure you’re aware.
Funny to watch Floozy's formidable NiTe demolish the questions. ILIs have Fi-mobilizing so typically show antagonism towards Fi-centric questionnaires attacking the intelligence or assumptions behind the questions and/or expressing reservation in their answers. Floozy's video is right on point and a good example of the self-sufficient gestalt.
Click here for my fuller description on the type five character type.
I'd point out that the following distinction also applies to other people's emotions, as well...
"Fours are more comfortable with their own emotions than fives."
Last edited by Kill4Me; 03-20-2019 at 05:06 PM.
No strong Fi no strong relationships other than to herself and her husband. Limited friends doesn’t really go out of her way to form strong bonds and cofeeling as @Sol calls it.
I am dedicated to my small group of friends
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't maintain a group of friends because I'm not the slightest bit social, and the socializing I do for work completely exhausts me. I have no social bandwidth to maintain friendships at the moment.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
It's me. I just felt like being a dickhead and seeing what's in vogue in socionics land lately. Surprisingly consistent, actually. Nobody has ever been able to rationalize IEI beyond "gut feeling" (read: implicit bias, because I have a pussy).
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
IEI
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
lol. You're just saying that because now you know it's me. That's rather embarrassing. You thought it might be, but you waited to see for sure. lololol
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
I’ve always typed you IEI
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Your reading comprehension is dire. I actually forgot about how horrific it is.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
You have not changed one bit still critical and so sad to see.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Fe- argument gets out of control. I’m not upset but they are upset but because they are upset the whole argument gets out of control
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Fe-I feed what they are feeding back to them. I can’t feel what they feel (Fi devalued no empathy)
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She pulls on people’s feelings for fun and yanks on people’s chains for reactions. She likes to identify or make up people’s weaknesses so that she can use them as weapons of attack, knock them down in the chain of hierarchy, therefore Beta NF. She has no concern for people’s real feelings and this is strength??? Psht
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Two of my oldest and best friends are ILI, and while they can be perfectly friendly, they have told me many times that people whom they think are stupid are stupid (and this includes most of the human race). They don't particularly go out of their way to hide this opinion from those people, either. Low Fe, perhaps.
On the other hand, IEI's may think you are stupid, but they will rarely tell you that directly (higher Fe). Instead, the most you will get is a kind of an oblique comment that calls you out. Basically to put up or shut up.
Which is exactly what she does here. She calls people out
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Evidently you don't know what "oblique" means.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
I have an honest question. Why do you feel like you have to display your intellectual prowess?
People love you not for your intelligence but for you and you’re good enough. I don’t need to know what words you use and how big your dictionary is. They just need you to be present and hug them. If you truly cared you would say “I use this word like this”
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Okay, Dr. Phil. Thanks for the encouragement.
I'm merely pointing out that I didn't make an "oblique comment" in an effort to call you out. I was pretty direct.
Also: a lot of people really dislike hugging. I hope you don't just run around hugging people and invading their personal space.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
P U S S Y B I A S
But seriously, the comment that you "mirror the emotions of those around you" sounded like Fe in the MBTI sense. INFJs are known to be "chamelions" who mimic their emotional environment. I don't know if it correlates in socionics since I only thoroughly know about ILI and LII at this point lol, and I'm not even certain about that. Regardless, you're probs not Fe creative.
----- FarDraft, 2020
I only do this when people get angry. I think it’s an artifact of my abusive and isolated early childhood. My mother was mentally ill, and she didn’t get angry in the normal way. She went from 0 to 100. So I never really learned how anger escalates, and I can’t spot it in others.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
there is no special MBTI sense and subjective emotions of Fi does not mean an autism. there is Jung's sense and + its expansions in Socionics
Fi types have the most of attention on sympathies and liking of other people. if those people are important - they introject them and "mirror" those emotions. Fe types mirror more Fe related from other people
mb related to IR. nontypes factors also influence, - more in limited forum's communications
you keep typing me beta
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Still as feisty as always. Always liked your humor. Welcome back.
This thread is too triggering for Maritsa.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Are you really sure that you understand my mood hereThis thread is too triggering for Maritsa.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Nope. I just know that you're a little bit psycho.Are you really sure that you understand my mood here
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
