Trump Babe Potential For Women (Rate Yourselves)

[Spermatozoa]

This is a quick questionnaire I have just designed


Trump Babe Potential


Questions:

First, please insert a topless pic of yourself


I will assess your facial attractiveness…
0 Stop taking this test, lolol -100 pts
1 -10 pts
2 -8 pts
3 -5 pts
4 -2 pts
5 0 pts
6 2 pts
7 5 pts
8 8 pts
9 10 pts
10 Photoshopped… so only 8 pts


What is your body fat percentage?
<15 % -5
15 – 19 0
20 – 24 5
25 – 29 10
30 – 34 5
35 – 39 0
40 – 45 -5
45 + -10

How big are your boobs?
A 0
B 1
C 2
D 3
Bigger than D 4

Are you white?
Yes +20
No -20

Have you had any interracial sex?
No +3
Yes -30

Are you on welfare or indebted?
Yes, it’s a man’s job to look after me -10
No +5



Are you are a feminist?
No +5
Yes -30

How many guns do you own?
None, and I want more gun control -3
None -1
One 1
More than one 3


Final Score
Less than 30 pts Feminists, degenerates and other undesirables
30 – 39 Some redpill potential
40 – 49 Significant redpill potential
50 – 59 Confirmed Trump Babe.
60 Unicorns and trannies

[marooned]

*designs demeaning quiz about penis size*

Also I can't understand why it's not good for it to be a man's job to look after me. Here I thought closed legs don't get fed. So apparently Trump is not after whores? He prefers the women that would rather he didn't enter the locker room when they are naked for "inspection" of the building. Then she is unwilling and that is more exciting. Also it allows him to humiliate her for being unreceptive, which he might enjoy very much.

Yet he has put money into a lot of hot women and has expected them to kiss his ass for it. But if they don't, then humiliation will do. It makes him hard.

I mean, am I wrong?

*runs off to have interracial sex*

[timber]

I do this is about 2 seconds when I first see somebody. Monkey brain ain't no shame.

[Cosmic Teapot]

I'm sorry is this the puberty section?

@OP

[Ave]

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

[timber]

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

A ILE, can't you tell?

[Ave]

A ILE, can't you tell?

Nah, I'm pretty certain his original typing as Ni-EIE is/was correct.

Though designing a quiz like this can't be TR. If he's serious about it I dunno what to say, if it's tongue in cheek, well, he's a good entertainer.

[WinnieW]

A ILE, can't you tell?

Threads of such pubertal style are likely made by someone being a member of a quadra with childlike romance style.

[timber]

Threads of such pubertal style are likely made by someone being a member of a quadra with childlike romance style.

Sure, historically that's been true. I don't know what type he is. I don't mind him. This thread is a bit of a laugh and let's face it, this is the current collective consciousness of the world right, this clash of values and opinions on this topic, so a Ni type would be easily aware of that paradigm. A Ne type be as well as they are connected to outer trends and are cognizant for the current paradigm. So, still the same problem.

[WinnieW]

Sure, historically that's been true. I don't know what type he is. I don't mind him. This thread is a bit of a laugh and let's face it...

It looks like that at least -valuing woman don't like such threads at all.
I don't find such humor funny, either, but I don't show my dislike in an emotional way.
tbh. I can't take a lot of his posts seriously.

Ok, I guess I do a lot of jokes either, but most of my jokes are not derogative, with a few exceptions... e.g. politicans.
If you post a lot of staff with non-serious attitude then how other people get you right when you post something with a serious attitude?

[The Reality Denialist]

Threads of such pubertal style are likely made by someone being a member of a quadra with childlike romance style.

Beta is the puberty quadra...

[WinnieW]

Beta is the puberty quadra...

No, obviously epsilon quadra.

[Tonatiuh]

What the hell is wrong with this guy?

What he lacks in intelligence he makes up for with his charms as this thread pretty much displays.

[timber]

I think that is the point.

[ashlesha]

Is the thought process the problem here or is it the bluntness? It looks like 90% of the forum's conversations about sexual selection but without a veneer of politeness on it.

[Ave]

Is the thought process the problem here or is it the bluntness? It looks like 90% of the forum's conversations about sexual selection but without a veneer of politeness on it.

Both women and men objectify each other and I'm not uncomfortable with that (as long as it stays within reason), but the OP is clearly out of touch with reality with his fantasies. I don't think women feel threatened by him or should feel threatened by him, the problem I have is more that he seems delusional to me. Unless, of course, he is joking.

Also, I take issue with some of the questions which clearly divert from sexual attraction into racism "Are you white?" and "Have you had interracial sex" etc. Not that worse things are not said on this forum, though...

[Pookie]

Both women and men objectify each other and I'm not uncomfortable with that (as long as it stays within reason), but the OP is clearly out of touch with reality with his fantasies. I don't think women feel threatened by him or should feel threatened by him, the problem I have is more that he seems delusional to me. Unless, of course, he is joking.

Also, I take issue with some of the questions which clearly divert from sexual attraction into racism "Are you white?" and "Have you had interracial sex" etc. Not that worse things are not said on this forum, though...

Is there really anyone who doubts that its a joke? The diversion from "sexual attraction into racism" is the joke.

[Singu]

Is the thought process the problem here or is it the bluntness? It looks like 90% of the forum's conversations about sexual selection but without a veneer of politeness on it.

Pretty sure this goes over the line...:

Are you white?
Yes +20
No -20

Have you had any interracial sex?
No +3
Yes -30

Also I'm not sure why you think "Well at least he's honest!" is a defense. If he has these thoughts, then fine, but keep it private (at least people have freedom of thought). The fact that he's making these thoughts public is exactly the reason why he's being criticized for it. And he might even eventually suffer the consequence for it, such as being banned.

[ashlesha]

Also I'm not sure why you think "Well at least he's honest!" is a defense. If he has these thoughts, then fine, but keep it private (at least people have freedom of thought). The fact that he's making these thoughts public is exactly the reason why he's being criticized for it. And he might even eventually suffer the consequence for it, such as being banned.

Its not a defense. It's an expression of annoyance at the rest of you for only caring about objectification or dehumanization when its expressed in an anti social or provocative fashion.

[timber]

Also I'm not sure why you think "Well at least he's honest!" is a defense. If he has these thoughts, then fine, but keep it private (at least people have freedom of thought). The fact that he's making these thoughts public is exactly the reason why he's being criticized for it.

Yeah Milo Yanniopolis does the same thing as here when he travels around giving lectures like some Marriah Carry prima-donna: travelling from hotel to hotel, speaking on topics that are to himself of utmost importance, just very important person. Really he's just motivated by the ego, a narc like all the rest, and he found a topic of conversation he can be a wind bag about and decided he would cash in on the controversy of it all. Fuck you Milo, if you don;t have anything good to say, then don't travel around from country to country saying it.

[Tonatiuh]

Yeah Milo Yanniopolis does the same thing as here when he travels around giving lectures like some Marriah Carry prima-donna: travelling from hotel to hotel, speaking on topics that are to himself of utmost importance, just very important person. Really he's just motivated by the ego, a narc like all the rest, and he found a topic of conversation he can be a wind bag about and decided he would cash in on the controversy of it all. Fuck you Milo, if you don;t have anything good to say, then don't travel around from country to country saying it.

Sounds like you're butthurt.

[timber]

Sounds like you're butthurt.

Not personally, no, not at all.

I just recognize retardness when I see it.

You are going to tell me this guy is motivated for the greater good of this world and not to perpetuate his own egoic self?

Getting make-up done, getting his pampered little coffees, his little journey's from hotel to hotel, his jackets and bracelets and jewelry and total non-chalant douche bagery where he just off hand says the most ignorant bullshit isn't just a total narc?

These are the kind of guys I can't stand. I don't hang around them. --->"do for me, but let me also deride you at the same time". eww.



This is the kind of person I conflict with. A boy -man. Just on the horizon of reasonable and logical, which is just smoke and mirrors and I see right through it to the tiny narcish core. Its not so much his messages that bug me, its him. I sense something really twisted and wrong with him personally. I've been vindicated with that gut feeling before so I trust it.

[wasp]

Is the thought process the problem here or is it the bluntness? It looks like 90% of the forum's conversations about sexual selection but without a veneer of politeness on it.

lol that's a joke, right?

the problem isn't this isolated incident, it's an accumulation of very similar incidents which usually revolve around his warped view of females wherein he generally believes they exist for his sexual pleasure and nothing more (in short, the main issue is his overactive libido). i don't think he's a serious threat, and nobody's claiming his thought process is foreign to males on this forum or elsewhere, but that still doesn't excuse how he speaks to various females on this forum, or how he speaks about females in general. i'd assume that somebody who identifies as a feminist would understand why some people (esp. females) would eventually take issue with him, unless feminism is only useful if it applies to your own discomfort with such uncouth behaviors.

[ashlesha]

lol that's a joke, right?

the problem isn't this isolated incident, it's an accumulation of very similar incidents which usually revolve around his warped view of females wherein he generally believes they exist for his sexual pleasure and nothing more (in short, the main issue is his overactive libido). i don't think he's a serious threat, and nobody's claiming his thought process is foreign to males on this forum or elsewhere, but that still doesn't excuse how he speaks to various females on this forum, or how he speaks about females in general. i'd assume that somebody who identifies as a feminist would understand why some people (esp. females) would eventually take issue with him, unless feminism is only useful if it applies to your own discomfort with such uncouth behaviors.

I get why people take issue with him. I just think it's not a threat precisely because its so obvious. It just becomes "express your commonly held views in a more socially acceptable way," and eventually he'll learn and become a real threat instead of something visible that can be sidestepped. I can barely even stomach the forum anymore because I was feeling objectified and shitty any time I looked at the chatbox but at least if spermatazoa were ever harassing me people might actually believe it and/or give a shit (or not, but at least it would fit the narrative and wouldn't be crazy-making). That doesn't "excuse" it any more than its excused from anyone else (whatever that means, as though my acceptance or lack thereof holds any weight, it demonstrably doesn't). For these reasons and others I appreciate when garbage is out in the open where everyone can see it, even to the point of being sympathetic towards people with disgusting worldviews who are at least fucking honest about it and willing to take the fall and let you know what you're dealing with. Its not that I expect or hope for this outlook from anyone else, and i definitely don't expect a similar sympathy from anyone else. It's that I don't see much utility in pointing at an obvious pile of garbage and saying, "look, it's garbage," when there are 20 other piles along the sidewalk covered in leaves. But that's just my personal feeling about it all and not some broader statement or call to arms. I don't really identify as a feminist anymore even though I'm sympathetic and I think it's an important cause, mostly because you're right - I realized that I was using feminist theory selfishly to make sense of and digest my experiences more than in service of any greater good and I do think the label should mean more than it does.

[ashlesha]

if spermatazoa were ever harassing me people might actually believe it and/or give a shit (or not, but at least it would fit the narrative and wouldn't be crazy-making).

Since I said this I also want to say that in my personal dealings with him he's had a good sense of boundaries, so this part of my post wasn't meant to convey that he's clearly a harasser or anything. More that he's someone people would expect that from while ignoring shitty behavior from polite people.

[Pookie]

lol that's a joke, right?

the problem isn't this isolated incident, it's an ...

... so this specific thing isnt a problem?

i'd assume that somebody who identifies as a feminist would understand why some people (esp. females) would eventually take issue with him, unless feminism is only useful if it applies to your own discomfort with such uncouth behaviors.

And yet your being snippy and mean when someone asks what exactly the problem was.... where you above.... said this wasnt a problem....

[wasp]

... so this specific thing isnt a problem?



And yet your being snippy and mean when someone asks what exactly the problem was.... where you above.... said this wasnt a problem....

lol I'm being "snippy and mean" by calling out lungs for causing a ruckus over adam strange sexually harassing her (wherein I defended her several times) meanwhile she couldn't care less if that sexual harassment is directed toward other people (and this is just one of many incidents):

I can tell that you have a good heart, but actions speak louder than words. If you want to save the world, start by giving a blowjob every day.

I think this is one of the many times where you should just learn to keep your nose out of it "pookie" unless you condone such commentary, in which case, thanks for letting the forum know that you think sexual harassment is ok, and maybe you should learn to quote someone's entire post, and not just the portion of the post that corresponds with whatever biased narrative you're trying to spin at any given moment.

my issue was the fact that lungs was being hypocritical, so someone who's barely around should probably refrain from commenting, and that includes lungs, because I don't even think she was around to see that post, however she was around to see even worse posts than that, yet now she's playing the role of the objective observer, but that's not fair. I'd seriously like to hope that she recognizes why such posts would rub certain people the wrong way.

[ashlesha]

lol I'm being "snippy and mean" by calling out lungs for causing a ruckus over adam strange sexually harassing her (wherein I defended her several times) meanwhile she couldn't care less if that sexual harassment is directed toward other people (and this is just one of many incidents):



I think this is one of the many times where you should just learn to keep your nose out of it "pookie" unless you condone such commentary, in which case, thanks for letting the forum know that you think sexual harassment is ok, and maybe you should learn to quote someone's entire post, and not just the portion of the post that corresponds with whatever biased narrative you're trying to spin at any given moment.

my issue was the fact that lungs was being hypocritical, so someone who's barely around should probably refrain from commenting, and that includes lungs, because I don't even think she was around to see that post, however she was around to see even worse posts than that.

I thought the issue was his opinions and humor, i didn't know about any targeted harassment. Sorry for being invalidating.

[Pookie]

lol I'm being "snippy and mean" by calling out lungs for causing a ruckus over adam strange sexually harassing her (wherein I defended her several times) meanwhile she couldn't care less if that sexual harassment is directed toward other people (and this is just one of many incidents):



I think this is one of the many times where you should just learn to keep your nose out of it "pookie" unless you condone such commentary, in which case, thanks for letting the forum know that you think sexual harassment is ok, and maybe you should learn to quote someone's entire post, and not just the portion of the post that corresponds with whatever biased narrative you're trying to spin at any given moment.

my issue was the fact that lungs was being hypocritical, so someone who's barely around should probably refrain from commenting, and that includes lungs, because I don't even think she was around to see that post, however she was around to see even worse posts than that.

I don't condone, or care about any of that behavior.

It just didn't make sense her statement leading to your response. So I didn't get the snippy-ness of it.

I left the rest out because it would have muddied the point. It wouldn't have made what I said make less sense, it would have just made what I was replying to less clear.

The whole keep your nose out of it unless you support sexual harassment is a strawman. His statement in the OP wasn't even sexual harassment, just vulgarity. Sexual harassment has to be directed at someone.

[ashlesha]

my issue was the fact that lungs was being hypocritical, so someone who's barely around should probably refrain from commenting, and that includes lungs, because I don't even think she was around to see that post, however she was around to see even worse posts than that, yet now she's playing the role of the objective observer, but that's not fair. I'd seriously like to hope that she recognizes why such posts would rub certain people the wrong way.

I think there's some confusion about the similarities between the two situations and what generally bothers me and what doesn't. This isn't a commentary on the validity of anybody's feelings or reactions or anything like that. If I seem terse it's because I feel like I'm being positioned to rehash the past which is making me feel uncomfortable and clammed up. It sounds like the situation here might involve more than sperma being sexist and having an abrasively crude sense of humor, in which case my comments were based in ignorance.

[Spermatozoa]

This is fantastic.

[Ave]

I also want to say that I don't have anything against him, personally, I've never conflicted with him or anything of the sort.

I actually don't take offense to this thread's OP as much as it might seem like I do, I nearly fell of my chair laughing at it last night, when I read it thoroughly, but I also think the OP is in lala land if he thinks women are going to post a picture of themselves and answer degrading questions: a masochist might get a kick out of it, but I doubt a masochist would actually degrade themselves in public. That's why it seems unrealistic to expect women to answer the questionnaire, and that's why I said what I said initially.

[ashlesha]

I also want to say that I don't have anything against him, personally, I've never conflicted with him or anything of the sort.

I actually don't take offense to this thread's OP as much as it might seem like I do, I nearly fell of my chair laughing at it last night, when I read it thoroughly, but I also think the OP is in lala land if he thinks women are going to post a picture of themselves and answer degrading questions: a masochist might get a kick out of it, but I doubt a masochist would actually degrade themselves in public. That's why it seems unrealistic to expect women to answer the questionnaire, and that's why I said what I said initially.

Lol yeah, it seems more like baiting.

[ashlesha]

I mean, one of the major reasons ive been distancing myself from this place is that half the conversations were about hot young gold diggers who are good at housekeeping and it was accepted and welcomed by the community. I gave my opinion that adults having sex with 14 year olds was wrong and I was lambasted and called an SJW. But then some dude who is all like, "Hehe look at me say the N word, I'm a bad boy" logs on and suddenly people have a moral backbone? Right. I don't buy it.

[timber]

Its seems as though its socially acceptable to hack people’s accounts and computers and share findings with several others in a large underground joke behind people’s back (true story).

This thread is child’s play compared to the ligit petty crimes some forumites have actually done, some of which have actually gotten people banned for dubious reasons - until a pattern emerged and the real shadsters were doscovered. But nooo you get called the bad guy, or coined off as just a troll for calling them out. If they were here I would deck their skulls in, actually.

As far as this thread goes its a bit like Milo Yanniopolos, who I find totally fucking abhorant in his flaunting historically socially acceptable sociopathy and sociopathic worldviews towards woman and minority groups.

The irony is that I do something like this thread anyway, but its something I can mentally manuever around and juggle my way through, the best way by keeping my mouth shut and not perpetuating the cultural sociopathy inherent in my mind’s eye. Age and stage is another factor here as often times its easy to be somewhat polly-anna about differences because you haven’t been burned by them, nor does your life path, circumstances, and collective company of peers, your immediate society, envoke universal sympathies for others. The path is a knife’s edge and I’m not going to love everybody or pretend to myself I do and I’ve already had Se sex and otherwise over the years so I don’t pine for it in imaginative fantasyland threads.

I can relate though to needing some level of badassery in my close inter relationships and I’m pretty jaded and to awake to want to be around polite company on a continious basis so for those reasons and like the stated original thread comments of mine I overall approve of the threads satire. Its a joke, a pretty weak ime compared to what my friends and acquaintances say in real life, and far better then other behaviours Ive seen here over the years.

[Ave]

Who are you referring to @ashlesha?

[ashlesha]

Who are you referring to @ashlesha?

The N word thing? Lol my nonliteral impression of the way spermatazoa presents himself. I don't think he's ever actually used the N word. His behavior just comes across as this impish boundary pushing.

[ooo]

His behavior just comes across as this impish boundary pushing.

yeah + vulgar, racist and misogynist.

but the thing I find most interesting is that you've felt objectified and it has bothered you yet it's ok if a similar behaviour spreads around coz "Ive been through worse/he's innocuous/I've seen it many other times".

This must be the air we're breathing collectively lately ok, but I'm just pretty impressed that someone can find it breathable. I mean, if it's so ok overall, then why not just get along with what it comports, harassment, objectification, racism, etc.?

The scary thing of Sperma is that he's actually not joking, he's been repeating and supporting these ideas since he joined. Hail.

[ashlesha]

but the thing I find most interesting is that you've felt objectified and it has bothered you yet it's ok if a similar behaviour spreads around coz "Ive been through worse/he's innocuous/I've seen it many other times".

Behold where I said it was "ok"

Its not that I expect or hope for this outlook from anyone else, and i definitely don't expect a similar sympathy from anyone else.

But that's just my personal feeling about it all and not some broader statement

[ooo]

Behold where I said it was "ok"

hmm ok, so you just find Sperma as a somewhat amusing character and for this wtv he says has that flavour of "oh well it's Sperma", while was it Adam or whoever else well maybe not so amusing, that can bother. I mean... it's totally understandable, we all do that for the people we like or not. But going off the tangent of possibilities that I often don't follow myself, even if my bestf were to be so racist I'd call her out, but I doubt I'd be close friend with such a very racist person.

The excuse here is that he's not addressing anyone* and so we can have a laugh at its stupidity, ok. The ideas behind this suck though and I find it commendable that someone came to point it out.

*in particular