Thread deleted sorry, ooops. May post laterThanks
What is your IQ?
Thread deleted sorry, ooops. May post later
Last edited by at sirac son of sirac; 02-22-2018 at 01:47 PM.
Probably pretty high.
Average but over 100. Maybe 110-120.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Somewhere between - ∞ and ∞.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I would like to see an IQ test without NT bias
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
I think or I have heard that actual cognitive tests measure things such as repetition of movements.Originally Posted by Tallmo
I can say that I'm visually quite restricted. I had to record my physics experiments on video in order to determine results but I have serious visual problems which are not related to visual acuity. I think those tests won't be fair. It is insanely easy to make me very dizzy in my head with right tricks.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
12 give or take a few points :3c
Just an enormous as my penis
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
My IQ range is called:
Now it makes sense, I remember the reflective glasses joke
Must be small when you can't even get the sentence right.
I see, I see...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
I would like to meet a stupid LII "mastermind". I am sure they exist because iq varies within the same type.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Mastuh mind iq computing events unimaginable for all yall little garbage people
They exist, you'll never know it because of how intellectual they are in their centers of interest though.
I never took a real IQ test so no clue. Plenty of fake IQ tests online though to falsely boost your ego.
“We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch
Ne-IEE
6w7 sp/sx
6w7-9w1-4w5
Probably in the 99th percentile (I tried Raven's SPM once). By the way, IQ is just meaningless.
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
So, a normal distribution... Well, not that "normal"...I see, I see...
KEEP IT LIGHT AND KEEP IT MOVING
so your IQ is enough to assume the existence of negative IQ numbers
I remember an mbti meme involving a picture of 3 men: two bulked up guys with bodybuilder physiques and one scrawny guy with very little muscle standing between the other two. The caption read: "when you're an INTP with average IQ"
I guess my IQ is not high enough for this joke. So the other guys are also INTP but with higher IQ?. But they are all 3 INTP? Or is the skinny guy INTP and the other 2 some sensors. Ok, I get it, they are all 3 INTP and the thing about muscle is a metaphor for intelligence. Or something..?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Yes, it is a normal distribution which means that it's tails will never cross the x-axis and therefore it is normed in a way that integration limits go from - ∞ to ∞.
https://www.wikiwand.com/en/Normal_distribution
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
There might be people with negative IQ numbers with a probability of 10 to the power of negative Graham's number.
If you get that joke, your IQ is probably well above average.
Yes, I think the meme was supposed to be playing on the idea or the stereotype of those types having high IQs and it might act as a metaphor or analogy for how one with an average IQ might feel in the presence of those with higher IQs. Muscles being analogous to intelligence, in the case of this meme.
Don't sell yourself short. IQ is an overrated metric.
Last edited by perpetuus; 02-23-2018 at 08:48 PM.
IQ is calculated as non-negative number only. You usage of the statistical model is wrong here, what I've pointed above.
another one. N types are such N types...
> If you get that joke, your IQ is probably well above average.
but his T seems to be so so, anyway
P.S. my IQ was 110-115 by Amthauer test
My IQ is -273,15
Setting average IQ as 100 is illogical itself. I think IQ should only give percentile. That 100 is there for traditional reasons.
I don't get how one contradiction sets you off but you are able to look past other contradictions (set by your position) when you settle your mind. I don't get it. Sorry, but you are such an F.
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Well, ability to see qualities that generate parallel paths might lead you to wrong paths...
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Negative IQ is interesting
Would it mean that you make other people more stupid? Being an IQ sink.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
Really? I guess your problem is that you don't understand the meaning of 10 to the power of negative Graham's number.
I'll explain it to you if you want.
All you have to do is to set the average IQ level to zero, and then all people with lower IQ has negative values as result.
It's a matter of definition of the reference number. The number 100 can be considered as an offset value.
btw. I never participated at an official IQ test, but I took an unofficial one and achieved 138 as result.
Last edited by WinnieW; 02-23-2018 at 10:14 PM.
Oh hello, Graham? I'm interested what it's about.
I'm a genius, i promise!! I'm just a late bloomer... Heh, heh...
If we define zero IQ as having no intelligence at all. Literally dumb as a rock. What would then negative IQ mean?
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
If you define zero IQ = no IQ at all then negative values are meaningless, but thats a different definition.
It's much like the definition of a temperature scale. Set 0 and 100 as numbers for observable temperatures that make sense to people in reality,
e.g. freezing point and boiling point of water, then you get the Celcius temperature scale.
Yes, it's a number used by a mathematician named Graham. It's a sooooo unbelieable huge number, it blows every imagination.
10 to the power of negative Graham's number is a number soo unimaginable tiny... it's not zero, but in reality it can be regarded as zero.
Classical NT style of humor...
It 'overclocks' and you become a genius
Destruction of the intelligence of other's.
anti-IQ, like anti-matter.
Your problem is that you don't take into account how IQ is calculated and that you can't understand it with the 1st time when I've said this above.
Maybe Feelers have negative IQ.
The decisive thing is not the reality of the object, but the reality of the subjective factor, i.e. the primordial images, which in their totality represent a psychic mirror-world. It is a mirror, however, with the peculiar capacity of representing the present contents of consciousness not in their known and customary form but in a certain sense sub specie aeternitatis, somewhat as a million-year old consciousness might see them.
(Jung on Si)
The way how IQ is calculated is a shared definition. Without such a definition called standard a comparisson of results would be impossible.
Therefore such a standard makes sense.
But it's a choice making the number 100 the average IQ value; the test would also work with number 1000 as average value.
No, they don't. But there is also EQ, the value of emotional intelligence. I guess feeler score better in such tests.
No reason to feel devalued, F-types have strengths in other areas of daily life.
There are also areas in life I'm not that good at.
3.35988
Improving your happiness and changing your personality for the better
Jungian theory is not grounded in empirical data (pdf file)
The case against type dynamics (pdf file)
Cautionary comments regarding the MBTI (pdf file)
Reinterpreting the MBTI via the five-factor model (pdf file)
Do the Big Five personality traits interact to predict life outcomes? (pdf file)
The Big Five personality test outperformed the Jungian and Enneagram test in predicting life outcomes
Evidence of correlations between human partners based on systematic reviews and meta-analyses of traits
Posting Permissions
