Ni ignoring

[The Idiot]

How does Ni ignoring manifest and how would it differ from ILE and IEE and their subtypes?

[Tigerfadder]

For example ILE can look at things that is so way in the future that it is sad. Totally ignoring the present development of things and only focus on the bigger picture. IEE on socials.

[Exodus]

It means generally being overconfident in the feasibility of one's ideas and projects -- excessive optimism, in particular with ILEs who tend to come up with crazier ideas in the first place. With IEEs you could say it has more to do with being naively trusting and assuming good things of people by default.

[The Reality Denialist]

Something to contribute in the moment search of ideas. Things will show it's other side in later developments. Something that is also doable when there exists constrictive elements such as limited time.

But considering it as internal state of peace or what ever it is called I prefer to keep external objective check on that.

[The Idiot]

I read on a reddit subreddit that ignoring Ni is about never believing that there's only one way of doing something and one way an event or situation can develop and trying to explore ( most probably mentally) all the possibilities and unknowns, example:when typing our selves as an INTp then suddenly start considering other types,starting with INTj then ENTp then ENFp then INFj because the Ne lead brain is never satisfied when things are settled,no more unexplored mysteries, no room for possibilities and alternatives etc. Could this be true?

[Exodus]

I read on a reddit subreddit that ignoring Ni is about never believing that there's only one way of doing something and one way an event or situation can develop and trying to explore ( most probably mentally) all the possibilities and unknowns

Sure, that's definitely part of it. Also, disliking it when people are overly sure of their beliefs and won't consider alternatives.

example:when typing our selves as an INTp then suddenly start considering other types,starting with INTj then ENTp then ENFp then INFj because the Ne lead brain is never satisfied when things are settled,no more unexplored mysteries, no room for possibilities and alternatives etc. Could this be true?

This specific example could be true of many other types. In fact ILEs should generally be more stable in typing themselves than types with weak Ti and Te like EIE (who has demonstrative Ne).

[Bertrand]

there's two distinct Ni pictures: oneself and socionics. as time goes on you could retype yourself not because you're ignoring the Ni picture but because you're developing either or both of those

dimensions of time and exception create a lot of motion in this way, that (norms) tends to misinterpret as confused because they have trouble seeing the overall trajectory and mistake it for mere masturbation (Ne "enjoyment" in this case). In other words, retyping can be a result of context deepening, not mere shifting for entertainment value. the two are actually bound up together such that one implicates the other anyway. creative Ne ends up in a similar spot as base Ni, etc.

(not that Ne base never messes around, or that every single time its an Ni dom ascending to some higher understanding, but that retyping is way more complex than "Ni ignoring"--that is actually a statement of Ni "norms"--that the picture should be complete)

[Tigerfadder]

I read on a reddit subreddit that ignoring Ni is about never believing that there's only one way of doing something and one way an event or situation can develop and trying to explore ( most probably mentally) all the possibilities and unknowns, example:when typing our selves as an INTp then suddenly start considering other types,starting with INTj then ENTp then ENFp then INFj because the Ne lead brain is never satisfied when things are settled,no more unexplored mysteries, no room for possibilities and alternatives etc. Could this be true?

I guess this is true. And when looking at the LIE for example they pick one and go hard at it (both Ne and Ni) while still looking at all possibilities while Ni ignoring does not. Committing. ;p