IR test (by Sol)

[Chae]

I've noticed that people of different sexes may be perceived differently by the used criterion. People of own sex are perceived as soul friends in lesser degree, while as colleagues in more. As this may affect the sorting, I've entered that condition.
For how test works on "gays" I have only hypothesis of analogy, which I used in the recommendations.

... yeah and my name is Robbie Rotten and I live in Lazy Town. Greetings! We actually don't have these types of false assumptions and faulty testing methods in our city. Please visit!

Okay the gays are a hypothesis but for heteros it's perfectly clear how it works I'll wait until ya sorted your stuff out! You better work honey. You better work.

[Sol]

We actually don't have these types of false assumptions and faulty testing methods in our city

Make video, I'll say your type, you'll do IR test and ONLY then you'll get basis to decide about its quality.
Until you'll create typing theme with your video-interview, there are no reasons to discuss IR test with you. Your type may be other than you think.

> for heteros it's perfectly clear how it works

Works like I said: people of own sex are sorted lesser close to IR theory.

this was one of the best socionics test I've ever seen, congrats for bringing it up!

If results of people typed by me will be close to IR theory - then not bad test. In many cases sortings are strange. If clips were better then results could be better, I suppose. At now, even not all combinations of type-sex fit to recommended minumum.

[Chae]

Make video, I'll say your type, you'll do IR test and ONLY then you'll get basis to decide about its quality.
Until you'll create typing theme with your video-interview, there are no reasons to discuss IR test with you. Your type may be other than you think.

> for heteros it's perfectly clear how it works

Works like I said: people of own sex are sorted lesser close to IR theory.

Nope! Robbie Rotten: out.

[ooo]

Yep Sol, you need to improve this, add some English videos and more varied scenes, it's boring to see most of those guys talking alone about god knows what... eheh, after 2 one is done!

[Sol]

you need to improve this, add some English videos

The language for nonverbal is not important, the words will only distract.

> and more varied scenes, it's boring to see most of those guys talking alone

Boring is caused by similar conditions - this helps easier to see the difference and to feel the common. Also you lesser distract on external stuff.

[Myst]

The language for nonverbal is not important, the words will only distract.

> and more varied scenes, it's boring to see most of those guys talking alone

Boring is caused by similar conditions - this helps easier to see the difference and to feel the common. Also you lesser distract on external stuff.

Is it a problem if I only watch one clip per example? You linked only one clip for each and it's not always easy to find a second one, apparently.

[Sol]

Is it a problem if I only watch one clip per example?

Any violation of recommendations is a problem. It will unpredictably reduce the validity of the testing.
I prefer to type with several clips by nonverbal info - it's based on my experience where impressions differ with lesser possibility with the more clips I saw. Here we have similar situation - you are using nonverbal for reading info related to a type.

> You linked only one clip for each and it's not always easy to find a second one, apparently.

Every link leads to a clip on a channel, - you may open other blogger's clip there. It's not so hard.