.
.
Last edited by bye; 11-27-2020 at 07:47 PM. Reason: Fixed the video attachment, thanks Chae
First impression (I've watched about 5 minutes): You look and act (physically) like an SLE, and you seem to think and do like an LIE.
I'll have to pay more attention to this later. Maybe listen to the whole thing.
Wait, it's running in the background, and I'm thinking more and more that you are SLE.
At the 14 minute mark, I'm sure you are SLE.
Welcome to the forum. You seem like a nice guy. The IEI's here should be pretty happy.
Well, when I was in the University, I would drop out sometimes to earn money. I liked high-paying jobs, even if they were menial, because ...money. I also always saw myself as owning a business.
But the evidence for SLE seems really overwhelming. I do think you are good at thinking. I really see a lot of similarities between us, but I've been accused of being SLE (and LSE, FWIW), because I have a lot of Se. I also like to work.
I also second SLE.
Some things suggesting Se lead function:
*Friends describe you as a bit 'impulsive' at times.
*See self as physically strong person and also strong willpower
*Very much a 'just do it' kind of person.
*If someone physically hurt you, you responded with "beat the shit out of them."
Fi PoLR:
*Tendency to go too far with joking around, dislike it when others are offended easily
*A chore to be diplomatic
*Dislike people that seem to like everyone or are accepting of everyone since you realize there are evil people in the world. Seems like a rather beta ST attitude.
Also Ni suggestive:
*Need help with planning and thinking about the future
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
Yep, Planet Beta ST Some James Hetfieldian V.I. vibes.
SLE-Ti is what I got. Dual is Ni +Fe ego to supply timing/planning ("long-distance thinking") and fun ("not boring, can take a joke", someone you can be straightforward with). As for instinct: So/Sp for sure. Enneagram 6?
Attaching the video works like this, click the film strip image in the post toolbar, you can enter the link.
Result:
I KNEW IT! Perfect. You gave me a good laugh about the satanic enneagram, if you want some more exorcism go to my blog for instinct stuff
Some input before you research about it - The reasoning behind enneagram 6 So/Sp would be that you are a community and safety-focused person. Your example about the terrorist/detecting lies/observing fellow workers was striking me as such. An SLE is usually either enneagram 3,6,8,7- I neither got overt image, career, control, materialistic focus from you, more of a grounded and trusting/surveillance feel. You already asked for guidance in your first post --> enneagram 6 at its best.
Your instinct stacking goes like this: you seem to be an affiliation type with less but present emphasis on self-preservation, and fewer thoughts go into relationships or just bonding in general, it doesn't have to be romantic. You have an idea about what you want, but as you said: you want to be your own boss. Your sense of self is firm and not outsourced. Social/self-pres lines up neatly with enneagram 6 - what's possible is that you may be Sp/So as well, but we'll see as you look into it more.
LOL, when I first joined the forum I told @Satan he had James Hetfield vibes after chatting with him a bit. I was imagining he looked like him too. He kind of resembled him a couple years ago. Some type him SLE as well.
I haven't watched the op's video yet but I will.
p.s. I have met James. I won't give my opinion on him. He was very drunk though.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Very clear video, I agree with SLE. The only other type that came to mind was SEE, though there were some things to speak against it.
-lots of emphasis on autonomy and doing what you want, impulsiveness
-all about work, working hard (Se, some Te)
-dislike of people who are too "nice", like weird, interesting people. Difficulty with people who are too shy and "don't talk" (Fe seeking)
-Others' misconception is (paraphrasing) that you can't be happy or do what you want to do. Being happy is a choice.
-no problem standing up for yourself, aggressive when necessary
-values honesty and directness
The conflict you describe is a classic example of Fe vs Fi values -- either being responsive (Fe) and attentive to one's duty (Ti) on the one hand or preferring to interact with people you like (Fi). Similarly the example of someone attributing badness in others to their environment or upbringing etc. is an example of NeFi.
SLE's cool, you are obviously ExTP. Definitely not LIE .
Maybe? You don't beat up girls do you...
I don't think SLI are particularly lazy. What others call lazy I just think of as doing my own thing. hah
Sometimes what people think of as Se lead is just anger management issues. My SLI brother in-law has irl trolled me past the breaking point of some people but I just gave it right back to him. He got angry when I used Fe (which I would exaggerate when we argued) before I got annoyed with him. But he actually does have anger management issues. According to my sister he can be insensitive but she is EII so her idea of insensitive and mine are a bit different.
Seriously though I was just saying that some of your answers could fit just as well for a delta ST too. I have no problem with Beta ST for you. If you think SLE is the best fit after checking out the alternatives then go with that. There is only so much others can tell you from a 30 minute video.
Welcome to the forum.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I knew you were being silly. hahah I think what you say here is important though. My brother in-law is similar to your coworker. He and my sister have the business, the dogs, the kid, the stability and I think he is very content with what he has. He has dreams of growing their business locally but I would say in general he is a simple man with simple desires. He does drive a HUGE truck with monster wheels. My sister and I both had to be lifted into. heh Not exactly a family car but they have one of those too. He does the hunting thing too. lol I think he has never lived further than 50 miles of where he was born and that is how he likes it.
I met James because Lars was hooking up with my boyfriend's (at the time) mom whenever he was in town.
I got into the music scene when I was really young and just found myself in circumstances where I was always meeting someone who knew someone and getting sucked into inner circles. That is how I ended up hanging out with a lot of musicians. Plus I ONLY dated, or had relationships, with guys in bands then. I was no victim in the getting sucked into inner circles. My friends and I plotted and schemed our way backstage many times for the more famous bands. The girl who introduced me to the most bands is an SLE. She is still a part of that world.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
I'll watch the video when I get home
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLE works, HA = mobilizing, yes
Awww, that is a cute story. I started listening to a few In Flames songs recently after someone sent them to me.
I had Iron Maiden autograph my jacket, when I was in NYC, and then my mom washed it! I cried.
I have performed in front of audiences but I don't play an instrument. I have danced onstage for bands, as part of the show, but only because they pushed me into it. I tried to teach myself to play guitar when I was a child but really I just strummed it and recited poetry to my friends or "channeled spirits". lol I lost friends when their parents found out I was doing seances.
This stuff is embarrassing to remember but funny too. I took violin for a few years but never got interested. My parents tried to get us into a lot of things, including, gymnastic and martial arts, which I think I preferred but I hated practice and lessons. I knew I was not a natural with an instrument. They felt kind of awkward to me.
I looked at your video again and more than James you remind me a little bit of Lemmy who I type LSI-Se. He could be SLE too I suppose. Alcohol and drugs kind of cloud cognitive functions.
Edit: I am weirdly opening up about personal stuff quickly to you if that means anything. Most likely Beta for you.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Why not ESTP?
MBTI ISTP is not Socionics ISTj, please drop the j/p switch bullshit. I wish that bullshit had never been made up in the first place, it just creates so much confusion for people.
By the way these stereotypes... ISTj/LSI != hard-assed prison guard lol. The point is that LSI is a Rational type so they will be more set in their thinking and ways than an Irrational like SLI or SLE.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Quickly? Activity relations?
I guess I wouldn't entirely exclude LSI just yet for @Viktor, actually.
I dunno if that must be SLE>LSI, that all fits me too. Except I rarely do the going too far with joking around. It did happen tho' before, sure. It being a chore to be diplomatic, can be just Fi role alright.
OK, where it's a bit "off" is I don't need much help with planning but I've appreciated input before in that area too, sure.
Still don't really see what in this is definitely SLE>LSI.
Btw I know LIE who does the swearing casually
That's not how you pick your type though lol, not because it sounds more interesting, I mean if your goal is to get to know and understand yourself more.
Anyway, did it make sense where I said LSI isn't a hard-assed prison guard, just more set in their thinking and their ways than SLE? With that taken into account, would you say you are more like the SLE or the LSI?
Hi,
LSI, SLE.
Super low energy looking, where you tired or something? Thought SLI when you kept rubbing your eyes.
Ahh right, same for me with MBTI vs Socionics heh. So Ti valuing of you (also your workplace behaviour with the colleagues that you described, struck me as such very much, adding this before I forget to note it).
Lol sure I noticed you are more relaxed about all this stuff, yes.I get what your saying, but I still think that LSIs are hard asses and nitpickers when it comes to rules, you obviously care more about the theory than I do for example lol. Don't get me wrong, I like LSIs. Still, thanks for taking the times to help me find my type, I think I'll stick with SLE for now
One note: for LSI (as a Ti valuing type) the rules are not from someone else's rulebook per se. Its their own book, they check everything else against that, including those rulebooks by other people. Make sense?
T (both Ti and Te) leading, especially with low Intuition, means the set rules should always apply, yes. (Just different kind of rules for Ti than for Te.)
The military / police thing... as I said, the "external rulebook" is checked by yourself, but eventually it can actually be accepted as valid (or at least most of it), depending. So, in that way these jobs work for some LSIs, I suppose? Add in some enneagram related motivations too, maybe. Like enneagram 6's particular interest in and sense of order.
So all in all, trust me, there are many LSIs that aren't military officers or police men.
As for the last sentences there, yah, I can break certain external rules too if they get in my way. Again, I'm not enneagram 6 or whatever.
Yeah, if you were LSI I would expect greater organization and attention to the environment (Si) and less impulsiveness.
I didn't say you had to be LSI. Just meant I can't tell if SLE or LSI yet. As to the why, I didn't see yet if Ti or Se is base function and I didn't see definite Fi PoLR yet, just weak Fi, and I'm not sure if I see Fe HA.
If I see something definite, I'll let you know.
As for the issues you bring up, typically LSI is at least partially organized, sure. I wouldn't be able to say why you aren't. Btw I don't do cars either lol.
EDIT: as for the impulsiveness: can you sum up as to when/why you get impulsive?
My impression is that you are LSI, possibly Se subtype.
Enneagram-wise, Sp/Sx 6w7 is likely.
Sp/so, obviously he is an sp dom (his values are independence, he stays at his boring ass job cause it pays well etc). The soc comes in at when he complains about girls who are shy. If he was sx 2nd he would be aware of the attraction between them and that would kind of be enough, especially if he's soc last. But he NEEDs to have conversations. Like he wouldn't try to drag words out of people if he was more aware of the non existent chemistry between them and/or valued it higher.
Hey Viktor,
Did you ever go by the username Viktor09 (or something similar) on another forum? I think I remember you. Glad to see you again!
I’ll look over your video in detail later. I have a couple options floating around as of now. Just out of curiosity, have you taken the test over at sociotype.com and if so, what did you get?
What you describe there sounds more like weaker Fi on his part.
Fi is about being able to accurately gauge the attraction (like/dislike etc.) between people.
For example, there are Logical types who are SX and they can still have troubles seeing whether someone truly likes them or not, because their Fi isn't good enough.
I am not saying Sp/So is entirely impossible, but I find Sp/Sx more likely. He also mentioned how he likes being friends with people who are into the same albums (music) like he is.
Sharing hobbies and passions like that is usually SX related. Sp/Sx people, as well as So/Sx people, tend to connect with others through shared passions and "loves" of things. Sp/So on the other hand, not really. They focus more on social interactions and talking about social/cultural things, like the mainstream media or politics. So/Sp does a similar thing, or they connect with others by sharing their favourite recipes, or by playing a certain sport together.
Sx is attraction/repulsion.. whether that is the same as Fi in Socionics (which is a system that probably doesn't exist), it doesn't matter. The instinct still is what it is.
Sx is the mating instinct, and without knowing what you're attracted to, how are you going to find a suitable mate?
Its common that people make friends with same interests like music, haha, it doesnt make you sx. Having friends with the same music taste makes it able to listen to it together(soc) and go to concerts together(soc). Me and my soc last friends don't talk about shared music tastes that much, except like i show them a song when i love it, i dont really care if they like it though. It's not a requirement for me that we share music tastes. In my experience so/sx have been the biggest fangirls of things.I am not saying Sp/So is entirely impossible, but I find Sp/Sx more likely. He also mentioned how he likes being friends with people who are into the same albums (music) like he is.
Sharing hobbies and passions like that is usually SX related. Sp/Sx people, as well as So/Sx people, tend to connect with others through shared passions and "loves" of things. Sp/So on the other hand, not really. They focus more on social interactions and talking about social/cultural things, like the mainstream media or politics. So/Sp does a similar thing, or they connect with others by sharing their favourite recipes, or by playing a certain sport together.
Looks like a person who has very good command on present. ST maybe SLE. [I must say that it can work another way around: one SLE got bit scared of my powerful vision according to his words.]
MOTTO: NEVER TRUST IN REALITY
Winning is for losers
Sincerely yours,
idiosyncratic type
Life is a joke but do you have a life?
Joinif you dare https://matrix.to/#/#The16Types:matrix.org
Looks like you'll adopt the SLE typing for a while because most people suggest that it is the correct one.
Some time down the line, after more study and self-reflection, you'll realize SLE doesn't entirely fit as well as it should, and then you re-question things.
And then you may warm up again to LSI, and self-type as that.
This has been a common pattern for people like you. ^^'
Do you or would you get a kick out of pushing people around if you had your own company and 35 employees?
Would you thrive on confrontation or would you do anything to ignore it?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
SLE or SLI
but you definitely seem to lead with sensing to me
your demeanor makes me think SLE though
but yeah I would definitely go with SLE like everyone is saying
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html