What you lack as a type!

[Tigerfadder]

On the basis that there is internal/external perspective and internal/external judgment and we got the lead/program, creative and demonstrative which we actively will. But the fourth of them is the ignoring, or observing as some want to call it, is the point which we lack.

We lack:

Internal judgement: LSE, ESE, EIE, LIE.
External judgement: LSI, ESI, LII, EII.
Internal perception: IEE, SEE, SLE, ILE.
External perception: ILI, SEI, IEI, SLI.


Why is this point important?

When you look how a person is dealing with daily business you can see how they are lagging on some areas. In these areas they/we do it as an afterthought and not in the present. It is important if to understand type.


Do we fail at life in these areas?

No, we just do it as an afterthought and not in the present moment.

[The Exception]

Can you please give some everyday examples here?

Also what do you mean by 'external judgement' in this context?

[Pallas]

Honestly, I think subtypes would also affect it, as in, for producing subtypes you'd have to switch all the judgement and perception ones since producing subtypes tend to have decent suggestives but awful PoLRs.

[The Exception]

I'm producing subtype LII, and I think my external judgement is likely better than my external perception. Still waiting for some everyday examples to see if my own judgement about this is right.

[FDG]

Holds true for me as LIE. Any kind of personal internal judment about an external event I tend to regard as completely unsubstantiated.

[Grendel]

I lack both the interpersonal prowess of Fi and the magical logicks of Ti so I got a pretty shitty deal.

I don't doubt my perception of the inner or outer world by an iota. It's mainly my judgment, especially in external reality.

[summerprincess]

Well I definitely lack external perception the most out of the four so seems right for me!

[Hot Scalding Gayser]

I took the general message of what you say is that we should all be nicer to everybody's flaws- because you can't help the way your brain was made or something- and in theory I could maybe jump in on that, but it is frustrating for other people when I attempt Te/Ti/Se/Si stuff, it's sluggish/slow and awkward and at the same time I roll my eyes at how unethical everybody else is and how they are not as righteous or good/pure/shiny as me and how their lack of Fe/Ni/Fi sometimes Ne failed in that situation. etc. with ESEs, I notice how they are using 'too much Fe' or putting the wrong emphasis on it. Nobody listens to each other, because we all think we are right and have the best answer.

And I feel like I shouldn't have to coddle people all the time to basically show more optimism and light hearted ness and be more Fe/playful and to not talk about grimdark serial killers 24/7 or something? (lol the other day this woman thought I was doing an impression of some killer she knew on a tv show but I was just literally fixing my hat...) or whatever the logical type is doing... and likewise they don't wanna baby me all day about my Te polr stuff. UNLESS THEY ARE MY DUAL. /swoons with maritsa.

[Simo]

Well I guess this can explain why you seek it (dual seeking function)
For example ILI lacks Ne so they seek Se

[Simo]

[QUOTE=DBlackGold;1161819]ILI doesn't lack Ne, they just don't like it/QUOTE]

well according to the OP theory ILI lacks external perception because they have Ne ignoring

I'm lacking love...type me.

Ah, I see, it's polr ethics >[

No it just means you are perfectly fine

[Beautiful sky]

I took the general message of what you say is that we should all be nicer to everybody's flaws- because you can't help the way your brain was made or something- and in theory I could maybe jump in on that, but it is frustrating for other people when I attempt Te/Ti/Se/Si stuff, it's sluggish/slow and awkward and at the same time I roll my eyes at how unethical everybody else is and how they are not as righteous or good/pure/shiny as me and how their lack of Fe/Ni/Fi sometimes Ne failed in that situation. etc. with ESEs, I notice how they are using 'too much Fe' or putting the wrong emphasis on it. Nobody listens to each other, because we all think we are right and have the best answer.

And I feel like I shouldn't have to coddle people all the time to basically show more optimism and light hearted ness and be more Fe/playful and to not talk about grimdark serial killers 24/7 or something? (lol the other day this woman thought I was doing an impression of some killer she knew on a tv show but I was just literally fixing my hat...) or whatever the logical type is doing... and likewise they don't wanna baby me all day about my Te polr stuff. UNLESS THEY ARE MY DUAL. /swoons with maritsa.

Omg

[Beautiful sky]

External judgement because I was trying so hard this weekend to decide which eyeshadow palette to get my sister for xmass and with so many choices how can one decide so I asked an LSE and he decided the one saying "those colors don't appear in the other ones and look more wearable "

[Eliza Thomason]

How does IEE lack internal perception, more specifically? I am drawing a blank (maybe because I lack internal perception?)

[Pallas]

@Eliza Thomason I just reread and the OP thinks the ignoring function is weak, when actually it's strong, and people just don't care about it as much.

[Tigerfadder]

@Eliza Thomason I just reread and the OP thinks the ignoring function is weak, when actually it's strong, and people just don't care about it as much.

You are obviously trolling! ;p Well, it is not weak and you can not really assign that term here.

[Eliza Thomason]

@Eliza Thomason I just reread and the OP thinks the ignoring function is weak, when actually it's strong, and people just don't care about it as much.

Ah, I see. (I do not understand ignoring function enough to make an intelligent comment here.)

[Pallas]

You are obviously trolling! ;p Well, it is not weak and you can not really assign that term here.

But the fourth of them is the ignoring, or observing as some want to call it, is the point which we lack.

The ignoring function is usually described as something so obvious people don't see a need to focus on it, not something people lack.