-
Extinguishment pairs classified by function dichotomies
I was playing around with the function dichotomies and came up with a way to classify the extinguishment pairs with the abstract, external, involved and internal dichotomies.
The elemental dichotomies:
Club information elements.png
Defining the 8 pairs based on the dichotomies:
Type |
Strong Functions |
Contact Functions |
Weak Functions |
Inert Functions |
IL_ |
Abstract |
External |
Involved |
Internal |
LS_ |
External |
Involved |
Internal |
Abstract |
SE_ |
Involved |
Internal |
Abstract |
External |
EI_ |
Internal |
Abstract |
External |
Involved |
LI_ |
Abstract |
Internal |
Involved |
External |
SL_ |
External |
Abstract |
Internal |
Involved |
ES_ |
Involved |
External |
Abstract |
Internal |
IE_ |
Internal |
Involved |
External |
Abstract |
A picture showing how these relate:
Rotations of N T P.png
Last edited by Lao Tzunami; 07-04-2016 at 08:03 AM.
-
What I would like is if someone could flesh out what exactly these dichotomies entail and make them more tangible. What exactly does Inert Internal look like vs Contact Internal, for example?
Tags for this Thread
Posting Permissions
- You may not post new threads
- You may not post replies
- You may not post attachments
- You may not edit your posts
-
Forum Rules