Beta Duality

[Mega]

I don't really see a problem with this thread. It is like the other ones on the instinctual variants.
Some posts will be very off, some will be very accurate. We are sharing ideas and discussing them. That's basically how it goes.

And I am actually seeing differences between the Duality Quadra threads. If it was true and everyone would just post their personal desires in them, the threads would all look the same.
But they don't. They seem to develop specific trends. I believe with enough good contributions, the overall idea of the threads will be mostly accurate.

With the underlying assumption that the images posted first had the right "stereotyped" idea of the quadra. Which has the underlying assumption that each duality has general stereotyped vibe.
IMO, the duality images have more to do with fucking enneagrams (because it relate to real world stuff and how you act in your world) than fucking socionics.

Funny thing is that Augusta created socionics in the first place because she thought there was something somewhere that had a correlation with social types, for exemple the nerd, the hardworker, and so on. For that she used IM that describes how you understand the world and how you understand how you fit in that world. That's a big ass fucking assumption to begin a fucking theory on, IMO.

[Olimpia]

IMO, the duality images have more to do with fucking enneagrams (because it relate to real world stuff and how you act in your world) than fucking socionics.

Funny thing is that Augusta created socionics in the first place because she thought there was something somewhere that had a correlation with social types, for exemple the nerd, the hardworker, and so on. For that she used IM that describes how you understand the world and how you understand how you fit in that world. That's a big ass fucking assumption to begin a fucking theory on, IMO.

So... why exactly are you a member of a Socionics forum?

P.S: I have seen the Romance Style apply to each Socionics type across Enneagram types. No matter what the IEI's Enneagram type was, they were still a Victim Romance Style deep down. Etc.

[Mega]

So... why exactly are you a member of a Socionics forum?

Don't ask lol, to pass time I suppose, and sometimes the forum is fun (but still, it's a good question to ask yourself)

P.S: I have seen the Romance Style apply to each Socionics type across Enneagram types. No matter what the IEI's Enneagram type was, they were still a Victim Romance Style deep down. Etc.

That's weird man. Fuck that shit man. It seems so much pulled out from someone's ass (the whole personality theory stuff) that it seems crazy to have some truth somewhere.

[Olimpia]

That's weird man. Fuck that shit man. It seems so much pulled out from someone's ass (the whole personality theory stuff) that it seems crazy to have some truth somewhere.

Again – kind of weird you still bother with Typology and this forum and all that.
Haha. Yeah, it seems crazy, but in my experience the Romance Styles thing is one of the things that is surprisingly true.

[Myst]

this thread makes me cringe by the lack of actual facts.
Just to be boring: written socionics' theory is already a bit blurry and hard as fck to get someone's type right considering it's how ppl comprehend the world and themselves in the world. It can lead to certain behaviours, but afaik it's not a golden rule to say that if someone act or dress a certain way then he's this type 100%. By this simple thought, pictures about people have no significance over some peeps type, it shows how they dress, and if you're some crazy psyche you can approximately deduce what their behaviour is (and that's a big motherfucker if here).

So, how I see it, it's some bunch of people fantasizing about some romance they could have had with someone and how that'd have made them feel.

I'm not saying that everything you've posted is wrong (i actually don't know), sometimes it just seems like you pulled it out of your ass from a previous feeling or desire you've experienced or have wanted to experience.

You are making non-factual assumptions yourself about the motives of people posting here

With the underlying assumption that the images posted first had the right "stereotyped" idea of the quadra. Which has the underlying assumption that each duality has general stereotyped vibe.
IMO, the duality images have more to do with fucking enneagrams (because it relate to real world stuff and how you act in your world) than fucking socionics.

Funny thing is that Augusta created socionics in the first place because she thought there was something somewhere that had a correlation with social types, for exemple the nerd, the hardworker, and so on. For that she used IM that describes how you understand the world and how you understand how you fit in that world. That's a big ass fucking assumption to begin a fucking theory on, IMO.

You're no Alpha NT for sure lol

[Mega]

You are making non-factual assumptions yourself about the motives of people posting here

If I didn't write that line I'm unsure I'd have gotten an answer to my post.

You're no Alpha NT for sure lol

IIRC, I said it had no relation whatsoever with Socionics. Moreover, why is that so?

[Myst]

If I didn't write that line I'm unsure I'd have gotten an answer to my post.

Lol so the purpose was provocation?

IIRC, I said it had no relation whatsoever with Socionics. Moreover, why is that so?

Why not alpha NT? They are the ones who make such hypotheses that are pretty much speculative assumptions

[Mega]

Lol so the purpose was provocation?

To make someone justify something I asked a question about, or at least provoke a critical thinking process about what the person had written.

Why not alpha NT? They are the ones who make such hypotheses that are pretty much speculative assumptions

If that fact rule out anyone from being alpha NT, why not. However, I think it doesn't (that is an assumption too, I have no way to prove that what you said is true and you have no way to prove it either, it's a sophism)

[Myst]

To make someone justify something I asked a question about, or at least provoke a critical thinking process about what the person had written.

I see

If that fact rule out anyone from being alpha NT, why not. However, I think it doesn't (that is an assumption too, I have no way to prove that what you said is true and you have no way to prove it either, it's a sophism)

Would you be happier if I said "you are no stereotypical alpha NT", instead?

[Mega]

Would you be happier if I said "you are no stereotypical alpha NT", instead?

I actually would lol, jeez .

Not because of the fact that I think I enter the alpha's NT band or not, but because it'd actually be true. Moreover, the assumption of the "stereotypical alpha" might be something different to you than it is to me but at least I think that to me, this assumption is true. Of course, the assumption is mine, not yours, etc. etc..