I am young adult, good looking, live in USA. I am ESTj and have not met duals before.
I am young adult, good looking, live in USA. I am ESTj and have not met duals before.
We need @Maritsa here.
Leckitsa is dead, long life to Flaxitsa.
I'd say she was referring to user Maritsa who (I guess) is an INFj?
Second sentence is probably a play on the quote, "The King is Dead, Love Live the King", again with usernames.
I'm less sure of their typing tough, as the joke might imply different things.
Or that might be a random statement with absolutely no real meaning whatsoever. Which would make it quite cool, I guess.
- Erl
Last edited by Erlaad; 10-08-2014 at 02:54 PM. Reason: Typos and general writing impairment, it seems
Socionics Types: ILE-Ti / ENTp (Alternatives: IEE - LII - ILI)
MBTI: ? (Possibilities: INTP, INFP, ENFP, INFJ)
Enneatype: ?w? sx (Possibilities: 4w3, 4w5. 5w6, 2w1)
Big Five: ?
Social Style: Expressive (Main) / Analytical (Secondary)
"I love my NE. I'm not sure 'bout anything in this world, but if there's one thing I'd bet on, is NE.
NE is not for the faint of heart: makes you scattered, makes your mind wander around, makes you curious and wander-lusting. Makes you want to begin everything all over again, just 'cause it might plan out in a totally way.
Embrace your NE, and it will open up a thousand worlds for ya."
Good luck catching one...they're rare birds! I have one for a sister and she is pretty awesome, sometimes even scary. If she saw how I expressed myself on this site she might be mortified.
Welcome to the forum new person! There is always something interesting happening if you know where to look but sometimes you gotta go off the beaten path to find what you are looking for.
This fits my sister pretty well I would say.
Last edited by Aylen; 10-08-2014 at 08:17 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
why does everyone assume young adult = male?
I think there are more EIIs around, they´re just too shy to show up until some value is violated.
Maybe you should look at pictures and maybe you should look at the shape of faces and expressions. Maybe they speak a thousand words. ..
http://l.yimg.com/lo/api/res/1.2/iCk...512.jpg.cf.jpg
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 10-08-2014 at 05:27 PM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Socionics Types: ILE-Ti / ENTp (Alternatives: IEE - LII - ILI)
MBTI: ? (Possibilities: INTP, INFP, ENFP, INFJ)
Enneatype: ?w? sx (Possibilities: 4w3, 4w5. 5w6, 2w1)
Big Five: ?
Social Style: Expressive (Main) / Analytical (Secondary)
"I love my NE. I'm not sure 'bout anything in this world, but if there's one thing I'd bet on, is NE.
NE is not for the faint of heart: makes you scattered, makes your mind wander around, makes you curious and wander-lusting. Makes you want to begin everything all over again, just 'cause it might plan out in a totally way.
Embrace your NE, and it will open up a thousand worlds for ya."
Lecky is an LSE forum member who has been a good friend over the long and horrible years that I've had on this forum. His user profile is Leckysupport. Persephone used a play on words to create a one out of his uset name and mine. She's suggesting oneness. She's cute! And now she is suggesting the same of you and I.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
As we reach for the stars, we must put away childish things; gods, spirits and other phantasms of the brain. Reality is cruel and unforgiving, yet we must steel ourselves and secure the survival of our race through the unflinching pursuit of science and technology.
- Stellaris
^ What the heck is your problem dude, were you not hugged enough as a child?
@FlaxSeed, you seem more like an SLE than LSE.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
@OP
Nice try
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Since we're throwing out solicitations,
Yes, if there is a delta NF in the US who is interested in personal growth, health, yoga, and building a family, and such things, send notifications my way!!@!@!@!
My appearance is cringeworthy and my personality perhaps even more so.
But we're duals or whatever.
Posts I wrote in the past contain less nuance.
If you're in this forum to learn something, be careful. Lots of misplaced toxicity.
~an extraverted consciousness is unable to believe in invisible forces.
~a certain mysterious power that may prove terribly fascinating to the extraverted man, for it touches his unconscious.
Better is to look among MBT followers as the quantity is much more. While types are same and MBTI helps to identify types in some degree.
2nd way is to identify types by yourself, for example of pretty girls near.
The choice among knowers of Socionics is too few to take it seriously for searching anywhere outside of USSR. And in most cases those will be with wrong own typing. So you get 2-3 "duals" per US state where only 1 is real dual wich is doubtful to be near your taste.
INFP is more probable, in case your type if F indeed
Don't look for an idea mate. You'll miss the one. Close your eyes and listen to your heart.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html