As ENTP t subtype, I use my Ti to explain my Ne visions.. is it unhealthy for me to explain how my Ti functions using Ti?
Ti explaining Ti
As ENTP t subtype, I use my Ti to explain my Ne visions.. is it unhealthy for me to explain how my Ti functions using Ti?
No, because you'd know yourself better than other people would; it probably means you are introspective about yourself, which is related to introversion. I think it's only unhealthy when someone thinks they can use their way of thinking to explain another's tbh; though I suppose too much introspection can keep someone in their head too much.
That's bizarre. So then only extroverts can best explain others through extroverted reflecting? Because I would beg to differ... MBTI anyone?Originally Posted by Snowball
This is probably the most nonsensical post i've ever read.
An ENTp would filter and sort through Ne information with Ti. I understand what he's trying to say. I think the problem is that you can't say, "I think, therefore I think." Saying, "I think, therefore I am" is more acceptable, because you're using external criteria (the fact that you exist) to validate internal associations, with the fact that you exist being data.
In other words, Ti would have to be reflected out in order to be explained. So the answer is no. You can not explain how an introverted function works with another introverted function or even the same function for that matter. For example, whenever I write, it usually has a bubbly overtone to it. But it's not bubbly at all within where it's manufactured. Fe just puts a nice little bow on top of everything after it leaves the Ni/Ti manufacturing facility and before it arrives Fe/Se at your doorstep.
wth
Do you mean how your Ne functions using Ti?
Or is it a circular joke on Ti on Ti
Errrrrrzzzzzz
I feel like I shouldn't have to explain how my Ti explains
It's Ne-body's guess.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
There are things people don't want to explain. .. they just do it
I think this makes sense?
If Ti is your creative, than yeah. It makes sense that your Ti would be used to explain something, even if it's the concept of Ti. That's the point of Contact functions i believe.
Projection is ordinary. Person A projects at person B, hoping tovalidate something about person A by the response of person B. However, person B, not wanting to be an obejct of someone elses ego and guarding against existential terror constructs a personality which protects his ego and maintain a certain sense of a robust and real self that is different and separate from person A. Sadly, this robust and real self, cut off by defenses of character from the rest of the world, is quite vulnerable and fragile given that it is imaginary and propped up through external feed back. Person B is dimly aware of this and defends against it all the more, even desperately projecting his anxieties back onto person A, with the hope of shoring up his ego with salubrious validation. All of this happens without A or B acknowledging it, of course. Because to face up to it consciously is shocking, in that this is all anybody is doing or can do and it seems absurd when you realize how pathetic it is.
It is unhealty in general that you talk about ILE in the first person because you are not one.
What type am I then?
INTj?
It might be LIE (ENTj).
-Slava
ENTP/INTP
Of course...
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote