Johannes Amadeus "Toby Keith" Mozart, you've got a lot of explaining to do.

[woofwoofl]

If you are LII, then your primary function is "Implicit Field Statics"

"Implicit Field Statics" is Fi, not Ti. Ti is Explicit Field Statics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

and your secondary function is "Explicit Field Statics".

"Explicit Field Statics" is Ti, not Ne. Ne is Implicit Object Statics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

If I am IEE, then my primary function is "Explicit Field Statics" and my secondary function is "Implicit Object Statics"

"Implicit Object Statics" is Ne, not Fi. Fi is Implicit Field Statics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

making "Implicit Field Statics" my weakest unvalued function.

"Implicit Field Statics" is Fi, not Ti. Ti is Explicit Field Statics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

Furthermore, your role function is "Implicit Object Statics".

"Implicit Object Statics" is Ne, not Fi. Fi is Implicit Field Statics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

It kinda seems obvious then that you would loom like a shadow over me: you're strong where I am strong and strong where I am defenseless. Anything I say will seem illogical and silly to you. Enjoy your superiority, dickhead.

Here's Ni: "Ni" = "Implicit Object Dynamics"

"Implicit Object Dynamics" is Fe, not Ni. Ni is Implicit Field Dynamics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

I just think that Xi = implicit and Xe = explicit. So the disagreement is with Aushra's definitions

So everything that should be in the ST group for IEs is in the Xe group in your explicitly non-Socionics system, and everything that should be in the NF group for IEs is in the Xi group in your explicitly non-Socionics system. Good to know.

When we say "engage in Te", we really mean "look through a particular lens", one that is focused on "explicit" and "dynamic" properties of "objects".

Holy shit, you got one right. Even a stopped clock is right twice a day...

"Se" = "Explicit Object Statics"

...and there's the second time.

"Si" = "Implicit Field Dynamics"
"Fe" = "Explicit Field Dynamics"

Looks like you got 'em all here anyways, good to know.

"Implicit Field Dynamics" is Ni, not Si. Si is Explicit Field Dynamics. Also, "Explicit Field Dynamics" is Si, not Fe. Fe is Implicit Object Dynamics.

http://www.wikisocion.org/en/index.p...mation_aspects

The first typing you ever made was of yourself. Let's translate a Joe-cionics IEE, piece by piece, into something in Socionics:

Joe-cionics Socionics
1) ...Ne... ...Ti....
2) ...Fi... ...Ne....
3) ...Se... ...Se....
4) ...Ti... ...Fi....
5) ...Si... ...Ni....
6) ...Te... ...Te....
7) ...Ni... ...Fe....
8) ...Fe... ...Si....

Interesting.

The first typing you ever made was of yourself, and it was based on a type description. From there, you typed your first round of people based strictly on how your personal interactions with them went. Some time after that, you changed 75% of the IEs into something that they strictly were not. There's fine-tuning of a definition, there's seeing verbal descriptions as always falling at least a bit short of what's getting described, but what you've done is far beyond that - you changed 75% of the IEs into other IEs. Those changes were made to cudgel an entire system around your initial self-typing as IEE, and you have consequentially distorted Socionics beyond all semblence of its original self into something strictly different. I have every reason in the world to suspect you've screwed your self-typing up, and absolutely no reason to suspect otherwise. You've got a hell of a lot of explaining to do, @Kenneth Chesney.