No ENFp has ever grown a full beard like the first guy.
Second dude seems alpha irrational, maybe an E9 ENTp or something.
No ENFp has ever grown a full beard like the first guy.
Second dude seems alpha irrational, maybe an E9 ENTp or something.
I think if you gave Rick a few decades he'd pull it off.
Or his significant other would, hyuck hyuck.
I don't think an interest-protecting IEE would walk around in public playing their guitar like that.Originally Posted by silke
There are lots and lots of women who seem IEE working in the entertainment industry from what I've noticed, either that or they happen to stand out for me.
Martina Topley Bird: IEE-Fi - singer, songwriter and performer.
No idea about her type. Probably Beta NF but idk. What are "Delta aesthetics" and why should I believe you?Pamela Wilson: IEE - artist, the peculiar type of settings in her works strike me as delta aesthetics.
EIEMarie Dubuque: IEE-Fi - etiquette expert and life coach
OMG, why did I even click on that video. Dubuque sounds and looks like a pathetic excuse for a woman. Could see Ni-ENFj.
Pamela Wilson VIs more like an ENTj, or some other Se/Ni intuitive.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Sorry guys, Dubuque isn't particularly attractive but all that this woman delivers are static character evaluations and relationship analyses, and she does it calmly with a blank face without dramatizing or overacting. It's like she's trying to suppress any excess emotions. She's not an Fe-type, and especially not an EIE.
Without dramatizing? Are you fucking kidding me? She has drama written all over her face, and you needn't see more than a minute of that video to hear her giving one sided interpretations of events and derived "meanings" of people's verbal reactions. That's Ni creative, combined with the lack of logic, common sense and moral decency of a non-Fi-valuing individual; contrary to what you'll find in an equally disgusting ENTj, for instance. She's nothing but a blob of pretensious mysery in the form of Fe+Ni.
An ENFp would be inclined to talk about ideas and possibilities, and provide real, practical insight into relationships and positive self-development feedback.
Last edited by Park; 02-08-2014 at 04:42 PM.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
SHe kind of strikes me as an ILE -- reminds me of Sandra Bullock a little bit, dont you think?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Severe anal contractions were my initial response as well, but in all honesty I do agree she's IEE.
“I have never tried that before, so I think I should definitely be able to do that.” --- Pippi Longstocking
"The Ricky Martin of Boxing"
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Y3IYVoUffTA
If Nicky Wire from the Manic Street Preachers is an IEE, he would be an awesome, intelligent IEE
ENFp
Marie Dubuque: IEE-Fi - etiquette expert and life coach
yes an IEE indeed and she and @FoxOnStilts look very much alike therefore my IEE typing of her
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Marie Dubuque - not seeing any depth in her words, which is what I expect from NeFi. She seems too "superficial" IMO, which is something I do not see in other NeFi's and also I have not been accused of ever. Also her having videos of herself instructing on some pretty basic, basic stuff make her seem more attention-seeking, which NeFi's usually are not. So I am thinking some strong Se. SeFi, maybe. She focuses on how she thinks things should work socially. I never looked at how things are supposed to work in relationship or socially. I focus on doing what I think is right, and so that should work, IMO. And if it doesn't, so be it, at least I did the right thing. I look at relationships from an inner intuitive idea. Not how many texts or who said what when. But just a look or a tone can tell me all I need to know without analyzing the actions. At least I start with my intuitive feeling about the interaction, and then monitor actions and words to see if they match up to the intuitive knowledge I have, to confirm it or see if its some other thing. So her approach is not at all like my NeFi approach, which makes me think she is some other type..
Super-awesome intelligent Ne-IEE:
Kristen Schaal <333
“Life shrinks or expands in proportion to one's courage.”
― Anais Nin
Alice Roberts
I also agree with IEE for
Jenson Button
some other examples from a Russian site (not sure of the credibility):
female IEEs: http://ru.laser.ru/gallery/wenfa/index.html
male IEEs: http://ru.laser.ru/gallery/menfa/index.html
P.S. does anyone else also think that the type examples threads in Delta should be stickied just like in other quadras (for easier browsing when looking for them)?
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
lol @Park... awww... how sweet of youyou've just typed Angelina Jolie as an awesome IEE... I'm afraid a lot of people in the forum will disagree
see, that's what happens when you type people in sunglasses
Do IEE's have a reputation of being dense? The ones I know all have above average intelligence and are very mentally quick, well-read and multi-talented.
Their intelligence seems broad, but not deep and they benefit from being interested in just about everything ever for at least 5 seconds.Do IEE's have a reputation of being dense
Haha I totally agree with you on that one. The ones I know are are very much "Look! Shiny!" and they take new interest/hobby/"special" person up every two weeks. And after two weeks of course they are world-class experts in that particular field
But still, I wouldn't call that unintelligent, just "attention span of a fish". I think they're one of the types that seem so bubbly and bouncy that people underastimate them and write them off as ditzy. I actually think they absorb knowledge quicker than most others - I mean they really seem to be good at a lot of very different things. And the quick wit and crazy connections - one cannot be thick to produce all these ideas. But yeah, this sort of superficiality of some ADHD IEE's rubs me the wrong way after a while too (I'm looking at you, my devilishly charming yet flighty IEE ex
)
Anyway, still love them and crush on them constantly
@darya some ADHD IEEs rub even other IEEs the wrong way
...and probably those IEEs you crush on - crush on you just the same (there's a certain "pull" towards IEIs I guess)
as sad as it sounds, I think I need to agree to some extent with @InvisibleJim regarding the depth - but I wouldn't call it the "depth of intelligence" - lol, what is that supposed to be, anyway? rather the depth/longevity of interest, maybe of knowledge in areas that didn't keep the interest long enough. Intelligence is the mental potential and knowledge is what you do with it - at least in my book.
Last edited by aisa; 06-11-2014 at 10:26 AM.
Jesus.
How about Lindsey Doe? Sx and Ne-IEE seems possible. She makes me feel like my natural thought processes are valid and acceptable.
Actually that seems wrong. I can't imagine an Fi type being so sincerely categorical about interpersonal communication and relationships, comme ca:
Ne-IEE - Chris Thompson
i'm not following the thread title for this one, as this is an unintelligent IEE.
that's because she's ILE
(also her eyes freak me outit feels they are going to pop out of the screen at some point during the video, lol
)
@darya @InvisibleJim - Yes, I can agree personally to what you're saying about having broad knowledge with little depth. Maybe other IEEs have cracked the code, but it's a downside that I recognize in myself and can't seem to shake. On the plus side, our broad interests make for great icebreakers with new relationships. I usually try to find the one topic of mutual interest with somebody new and then let them talk and share their level of depth on the subject with me
And if God cares so wonderfully for flowers that are here today and gone tomorrow, won't he more surely care for you?- Matthew 6:30
David Foster Wallace
Her teeth are a messsssssssss.that's because she's ILE
(also her eyes freak me out
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
lolll, I didn't notice, I was distracted by the eyezzzz
but hey, they're not pitch black teeth, nor gold veeners - could've been worse
lol i thought her teeth were cute!lolll, I didn't notice, I was distracted by the eyezzzz
but hey, they're not pitch black teeth, nor gold veeners - could've been worse
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Broad knowledge at expense of not going deeper isn't just an extravert trend?
she's LSE-Te so/sp imo. not Fi and not Sx by any means
Could be, Idk. I agree with logical>ethical, no Fi and so-first.
yeah I don't know where I came up with anything remotely sx for her. I posted her in the so/sp thread as recompense
IEE
I think I spotted yet another IEE today. What do you think?
http://www.pneumaticaddict.com/p/about_2626.html
[| NP | 3[6w5]8 so/sp | Type thread | My typing of forum members | Johari (Strengths) | Nohari (Weaknesses)
You know what? You're an individual, and that makes people nervous. And it's gonna keep making people nervous for the rest of your life. - Ole Golly from Harriet, the spy.
Video for typing is much better.
Yes
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
