Aylen, post your IEI examples. give us the Truth
Aylen, post your IEI examples. give us the Truth
Originally Posted by Sol
Aylen, post your IEI examples. give us the Truth
Ni polr...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
We'll try.
INFP examples from INFP example. Save us!
I am pretty sure about @Starfall's type so I don't think it needs defending. From what I see she has not flip flopped through all the types and seems she knew what fit her rather quickly. I do not need people to agree with me but validation feels good to anyone.We'll try.
INFP examples from INFP example. Save us!
Not to reinforce your stereotype of sexy IEI but here is my second offering to this thread. If there is a such thing as subtypes, she is what I think of when I think Fe sub. I don't really feel I have a subtype but I can work with the evolution of a theory, unlike you.
If you disagree it will just make my day.
Edit: I am no longer sure if I would give her a subtype. I listened to both interviews again and she has a good handle on both. She is an abstract thinker using Fe to interact with her interviewers.
Last edited by Aylen; 07-08-2016 at 08:13 PM.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Of the three, she is only blonde. You would know that if you watched and listened.
Wendy James - I-P (wacey should to yell "dumb, blonde, bimbo")
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Aylen
I've watched more, including where she's older. She's a little "boring" and lesser playful than INFP, so Fi types (EII) I'll add to possible.
She is not boring.She is a 9.
Do you find your duals boring??? Lame...
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
onision is fi ego possibly and hes not boring
Eva Green - ENFP
In my perception T, S, E types women are lesser feminine and hence, in average, I find them lesser sexually interesting. Some IR also reduce it. Besides types there are other traits wich affect on this impression.
And surely I don't percieve all woman in the entertainment industry as significantly interesting, even when some of them have good body. For example, ESTP are one of the last for this.
as anything, it needs good skills to be "ruly". also there should not be used physiognomy
as it gives typing matches not much worse than questionnaires and IRL interviews, - the method itself is good
Last edited by Sol; 07-09-2016 at 03:55 PM.
Actually turns out that all of you are wrong. Starfall is IEI. She's kind and smart and she she's beautiful about all she takes good care of her family.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Reply With Quote
