Beta Ni girls sound pretty dim.
Beta Ni girls sound pretty dim.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
@Fireyed...
When you say your bf doesn't understand that you actually do enjoy doing crazy things, he probably just doesn't want to pressure you into it. I know with me, when I was younger I used to ask people 1,000,000 times if they'd go with me somewhere until they said yes out of simply being exhausted from saying no. He'd probably naturally want to you to join him but knows its kind of annoying to some people to the point where he doesn't even bother asking you or anyone else anymore.
Just a possibility. Dunno how true it is in your case.
According to Reinin, Aristocratic types don't understand that the inner world is something separate from the external world, they get over this barrier by having their own inner world completely determined by external phenomenon. I'm afraid you might be talking to a brick wall.
Jay, I found some dual duckies for you.
Here is what his dual really looks like!
Socionics -
the16types.info
LOL
What's with the baths?
I don't get tired of my dual; I want MOOOORE please.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Idunno, IME women have the uncanny ability to stick around and tolerate us way longer than we can tolerate them.
Now this is a story all about how, my type got changed, turned upside down. Just wait for a minute and watch chatbox right there, & I'll tell how Gem became the moderator with blue hair.
In typology central friended and praised, on the picture thread was where she spent most her days. Chilling out, selfies, relaxing all cool, And all typing some people and getting them schooled.
When a couple of girls who were up to no good, Started annoying her & her friends in the forumhood, She got in one little flame war & got pissed off & said 'I'm moving in with that exboyfriend in the forum with the socionics toffs.
So Gem pulls up to the forum for a year without being a hater, And yells to typocentral 'Yo creeps! Smell Ya later', Became a mod in her kingdom she was finally there, To sit on her throne as the mod with blue hair.
InvisibruJim
Not my experience. I've been breaking things off left and right. My friends are often telling me I don't give people enough of a chance. I'm always telling people the guy has to be great because I don't want to wake up and moan inwardly,"WHY ARE YOU IN MY BED?!" the next morning. I just stopped two people cold this week on separate occasions who wanted to be romantic because I thought ahead and realized I'd be bored or unfulfilled by being with them and that I wouldn't be the best person for them, either. (They'd be great with and for someone else.) I brought out my beautiful go-to, developed after years of flailing around confused by how to say a no-thank-you:"You deserve to know what I am thinking.I am not pursuing you romantically. I do not think that we would make each other good partners. I think you are handsome and have a pleasant (personality trait). Thank you so much for your kind compliments. I love friendship. I am worried that you will take how I see it--thinking that we will not work for each other--as a personal rejection and that you won't hang out with me or talk with or like me as a person. I hope that is not the case." Works like a freaking charm for those awkward instances where Ms./Mr. Wrong thinks you should date each other and is one diplomatic slip-up on your part from thinking of you as an ass. I'm really intense and want a lot out of a relationship...or...no relationship. Oh, and I'm not saying I have a reverse-gender Axe cologne commercial going on here with guys falling at my feet. I get lonely and feel unattractive all the time.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html