There are 40 possible patterns and it is obtained by taken your most two extreme scores (either highest and/or lowest).
For example, my result is:
Openness to Experience - 76
Conscientiousness - 58
Extraversion - 12
Agreeableness - 38
Neuroticism - 55
My most two extreme scores are low extraversion and high openness
Here is my pattern type, which I say is quite accurate:
BOOKWORMISH TYPE (Low E, High O) Bookwormish Types are highly intellectual, introspective, self- examining loners. Although they keep to themselves, their level of intelligence and learning garners them respect for others. They are described by other persons as learned, well-read, persevering, rule- abiding, calm, and industrious.
I also think neuroticism is probably high in actuality rather than just average. So I could also be this pattern: DISCOURAGED TYPE (Low E, Low S) Discouraged Types are not happy with their present life situation but feel there is no way out because they lack the ability to improve their life circumstances. They are perceived by others as unambitious, unenergetic, shy, solitary, passive, introverted, cowardly, pessimistic, insecure, and fearful.
Or maybe even this one:
SENSITIVE TYPE (Low S, High O) Sensitive types are very bright but emotionally sensitive. They pay attention to, and are strongly affected by, things that happen in the world around them. They open themselves to their environment; consequently they enjoy many positive sensory experiences, but on the other hand they are vulnerable to having their feelings hurt. They are described by others as complex and imaginative.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
I've pasted the pattern descriptions from the article above.
These "pattern types" are based on Hofstee, De Raade, and Goldberg's AB5C model of personality and were included in the original version of the narrative report generated. A person's two most extreme scores (high or low) determined their pattern. Currently these descriptions do not appear in the narrative report.
Pattern 1.1 PERSONABLE TYPE (High E, High A) Personable Types enjoy interacting with other people. Personable individuals frequently experience and express positive emotions and are therefore typically well-liked by others. They derive satisfaction from helping, and are well-suited for careers in the helping professions (counseling, teaching, nursing, human services). They are described by others as cheerful, confident, sociable, vigorous, enthusiastic, and friendly.
Pattern 1.2 DOMINEERING TYPE (High E, Low A) Domineering Types enjoy exerting power and influence over others and strive to control them without taking their feelings into account. They are seen by others as critical, self-centered, stubborn, and bossy.
Pattern 1.3 HUMBLE TYPE (Low E, High A) Humble Types are peace-loving, somewhat timid, and seek social acceptance by going along with what others want. These individuals are described by others with terms such as calm, agreeable, cooperative, composed, warm, preserving, and submissive.
Pattern 1.4 DISTANT TYPE (Low E, Low A) Distant Types show an active disinterest in other people. They are detached, skeptical, cynical loners who find little joy in human relations. They are described by others as solitary, depressed, worried, introverted, and shy.
Pattern 2.1 ENTERPRISING TYPE (High E, High C) Enterprising Types strive for success as defined by conventional social standards. They are ambitious, competitive, achievement-oriented, purposeful, leaderlike, and willing to move into positions of authority. Their probability of success in leadership roles will increase with higher scores on Agreeableness, Emotional Stability, and Openness.
Pattern 2.2 IMPULSIVE TYPE (High E, Low C) Impulsive Types are exhibitionists who act outrageously in order to attract attention from others. Often rather unconventional, risk- taking, flamboyant, they also need and enjoy social stimulation. They are described by others as talkative, outgoing, changeable, blunt, and outspoken.
Pattern 2.3 INDUSTRIOUS TYPE (Low E, High C) Industrious Types are businesslike, self-disciplined, orderly workers who prefer to achieve on their own effort than as part of a team. They have great respect for rules and social conventions, and can be counted on to work productively without close supervision. They are described by others with terms such as learned, conscientious, persevering, tactful, cooperative, conservative, reserved, and predictable.
Pattern 2.4 APATHETIC TYPE (Low E, Low C) Apathetic Types lack energy and direction in life. They are described by others with terms such as passive, unenergetic, unambitious, sluggish, indecisive, aimless, and wishy-washy.
Pattern 3.1 SOCIALLY SELF-CONFIDENT TYPE (High E, High S) Socially Self-Confident Types are extraverts with high levels of energy and self-confidence. Their personality traits make them well-suited for leadership and supervisory roles. They are seen by others as enterprising, vigorous, self-assured, sociable, and active.
Pattern 3.2 MOODY-MANIC TYPE (High E, Low S) Moody-Manic Types are high-strung, emotional extraverts who have difficulty keeping their feelings in check. Their moods fluctuate up and down unpredictably. Others describe them with terms such as changeable, unorthodox, explosive, undependable, excitable, and volatile.
Pattern 3.3 SATISFIED TYPE (Low E, High S) Satisfied Types who feel they have risen above the problems of living and are content with things as they are. They see little point in getting involved in a rat-race to struggle to the top of the heap. They see stability and security as more important than getting ahead and are likely to be content with a respectable job in their home town, earning just enough money to make a living. They are described by others with terms such as sedate, tranquil, placid, ethical, responsible, unexcitable, and unassuming.
Pattern 3.4 DISCOURAGED TYPE (Low E, Low S) Discouraged Types are not happy with their present life situation but feel there is no way out because they lack the ability to improve their life circumstances. They are perceived by others as unambitious, unenergetic, shy, solitary, passive, introverted, cowardly, pessimistic, insecure, and fearful.
Pattern 4.1 DEBONAIR TYPE (High E, High O) Debonair Types are intelligent extraverts. In their worldliness they can be quite witty and charming. They have a flair for the dramatic, and can be histrionic and theatrical. People are naturally attracted to debonair types, but if a debonair type dislikes somebody, he or she can swiftly cut that person to the quick. Therefore, this type is generally described with positive terms such as enterprising, eloquent, forward-looking, confident, and sexy, but can also be described as critical, candid, and intense.
Pattern 4.2 INDISCRETE TYPE (High E, Low O) Indiscreet Types are extraverts who impulsively talk and boast without knowing what they are talking about. They are pompous and full of bluster. Talkativeness and ignorance is an unfortunate combination not tolerated well by others. Indiscreet types are described as unlearned, unlettered, anxious, quitting, rule-avoiding, and self-centered.
Pattern 4.3 BOOKWORMISH TYPE (Low E, High O) Bookwormish Types are highly intellectual, introspective, self- examining loners. Although they keep to themselves, their level of intelligence and learning garners them respect for others. They are described by other persons as learned, well-read, persevering, rule- abiding, calm, and industrious.
Pattern 4.4 LETHARGIC TYPE (Low E, Low O) Lethargic Types lack the energy to meet people or get involved in new things, and consequently tend to live in the past. They lack imagination and self-direction, preferring to go along with others or simply repeating their past patterns of behavior. Others describe them as agreeable, unambitious, reminiscent, and worried.
Pattern 5.1 COMPROMISING TYPE (High A, High C) Compromising Types are oriented toward getting along with others. Valuing interpersonal harmony, they are more likely to compromise than confront in a difficult situation. They are described by other people as cooperative, persevering, composed, trustworthy, empathic, agreeable, traditional, simple, old-fashioned, predictable, down-to- earth, and preserving.
Pattern 5.2 OTHER-DIRECTED TYPE (High A, Low C) Other-Directed Types are easy-going, somewhat lazy drifters who lack strong opinions and principles. They prefer simply to hang out with their social crowd. They are described by others as relaxed, outgoing, and unlettered.
Pattern 5.3 MORALISTIC TYPE (Low A, High C) Moralistic Types are rule-oriented achievers who sometimes ignore the feelings of others in order to get the job done. Principles are more important than people to moralistic types, and they can be equally hard on themselves. This achievement-oriented, hard-driven type has great initiative and moves readily into positions of authority. They believe in working with and through the system and in advancing upward through hard work. They are unlikely to take risks, and their leadership style is likely to be seen as no-nonsense and instrumental. They are described by others as well-read, tense, and reserved.
Pattern 5.4 SELF-CENTERED TYPE (Low A, Low C) Self-Centered Types are indifferent to both conventional rules and the feelings of others, acting instead on their own self-interest. Depending upon their degree of self-centeredness, they may be simply impolite or can be downright abusive. They are described by others with terms such as unorthodox, stubborn, moody, unreliable, inconsiderate, uncooperative, disrespectful, egotistical, and conceited.
Pattern 6.1 PLEASANT TYPE (High A, High S) Pleasant Types are full of positive emotions and free from negative emotions. They are almost universally liked. They are described by others as confident, cheerful, relaxed, tolerant, composed, calm, goodnatured, poised, persevering, vigorous, enterprising, extraverted, warm, trustworthy, empathic, conscientious, cooperative, simple, traditional, predictable, and down-to-earth.
Pattern 6.2 EMOTIONAL TYPE (High A, Low S) Emotional Types--whether male or female--are stereotypically feminine. They are in touch with both positive and negative feelings. Others describe them with terms such as sentimental, affectionate, sensitive, soft, passionate, romantic, feminine, emotional, and gullible.
Pattern 6.3 UNEMOTIONAL TYPE (Low A, High S) Unemotional Types--whether male or female--are stereotypically masculine. Regarding emotions as a sign of weakness, they see themselves as strong, stable, and unaffected by emotions. Others describe them with terms such as insensitive, unaffectionate, passionless, nonreligious, unemotional, and masculine.
Pattern 6.4 MOODY TYPE (Low A, Low S) Moody Types tend to report experiencing many negative emotions and few positive emotions. They are described by others as complex, changeable, worried, depressed, tense, impatient, moody, anxious, irritable, nervous, quitting, unenergetic, unambitious, introverted, cold, unreliable, self-centered, negligent, and stubborn.
Pattern 7.1 TOLERANT TYPE (High A, High O) Tolerant Types are open to, and accepting of, differences in other people. They care about the feelings of others and tend to take their opinions into account when making decisions. Their social skills are reasonably well-developed and they normally relate well to others in both co-worker and supervisory roles. They are described by others with such terms as good-natured, empathic, genial, tactful, diplomatic, calm, and poised.
Pattern 7.2 GULLIBLE TYPE (High A, Low O) Gullible Types follow the crowd rather than thinking for themselves. They are described by others with such terms as simple, down-to-earth, dependent, easy-going, and servile.
Pattern 7.3 INDIVIDUALISTIC TYPE (Low A, High O) Individualistic types consider themselves to be unique and more intelligent than most people around them. In extreme cases they might be regarded as eccentric, but in most cases they are perceived by others as complex, well-read, imaginative, and industrious.
Pattern 7.4 NARROW-MINDED TYPE (Low A, Low O) Narrow-minded Types are independent, self-contained, and openly willing to express annoyance with others. Others may find this difficult to deal with. They tend to be intolerant of persons who are different from them, and, in extreme cases, may be prejudiced or bigoted. They are describe by others with such terms as irritable, self-centered, anxious, callous, tactless, and curt. Their brusqueness may be relatively unimportant to persons employed in menial or technical work, but may tend to limit performance in supervisory roles and in relations with others.
Pattern 8.1 PERSISTENT TYPE (High C, High S) Persistent Types are hard-working, stable individuals who perform well in structured, rule-governed environments. They are described by others as rule-abiding, composed, persevering, conscientious, trustworthy, cooperative, traditional, predictable, simple, and down- to-earth.
Pattern 8.2 FUSSY TYPES (High C, Low S) Fussy Types are perfectionists who crave structure and order but who never seem to be able to achieve the order and predictability they desire. Their own emotional instability fosters a self-defeating pattern. They are described by others with terms such as particular, well-read, shy, and introverted.
Pattern 8.3 CAREFREE TYPE (Low C, High S) Carefree Types are folksy, simple, happy-go-lucky persons. They are unconcerned about rules, schedules, and routines, but are not actively antisocial or hostile to authority. They are described by others with terms such as informal, self-assured, extraverted, and unlettered.
Pattern 8.4 SCATTERED TYPE (Low C, Low S) Scattered Types show emotional instability that affects both their thinking and their social relationships. Internally they are inconsistent, erratic and forgetful; in groups they can be impulsive, nosy, gossipy, and self-indulgent. On the job, their unpredictability may annoy co-workers and supervisors. Others describe them as unorthodox, changeable, complex, imaginative, rule-avoiding, moody, quitting, negligent, unreliable, stubborn, self-centered, and unreflective.
Pattern 9.1 CULTURED TYPE (High C, High O) Cultured Types are imaginative and resourceful in their thinking but conforming and traditional in their behavior. They use their intellectual skills to contribute to the common good. They may have a dignified, refined, and somewhat reserved air about them. Their perceptive and analytical abilities allow them to see through complex issues rapidly and accurately, allowing them to find quickly the most effective means of achieving desired ends. They are successful perfectionists, well suited for work that requires close concentration, self-control, and attention to detail. Others describe them as rule- abiding, persevering, learned, well-read, empathic, trustworthy, industrious, leaderlike, traditional, silent, and reserved.
Pattern 9.2 CONVENTIONAL TYPE (High C, Low O) Conventional types are tradition-oriented persons who always "go by the book" rather than improvising, innovating, or thinking for themselves. They are quite responsible and can be relied on to follow directions and get the job done. They are described by others as agreeable, simple, and down-to-earth.
Pattern 9.3 FANCIFUL/IMAGINATIVE TYPE (Low C, High O) Fanciful/Imaginative Types are unconventional nonconformists who pride themselves on being different from others. They are not so much openly antisocial and disruptive in their behavior as they are fanciful, impractical, and unconcerned about the general welfare of others. They are described by others as complex, imaginative, and critical.
Pattern 9.4 IMMATURE TYPE (Low C, Low O) Immature Types have a history of problems with self-discipline and self-control. As young students they were likely to be restless and unable to concentrate in the classroom, and therefore performed poorly. As adults they are therefore regarded as rough and uncouth as well as impulsive. They like thrills, adventure and action and would find working behind a desk to be frustrating and boring. They are described by others as unorthodox, talkative, outgoing, rule-avoiding, quitting, unlearned, unlettered, self-centered, and unreliable.
Pattern 10.1 CLEAR-THINKING TYPE (High S, High O) Clear-thinking types are well-adjusted, intelligent individuals. They approach problems in a nonplused, matter-of-fact way, and feel confident about their ability to solve problems. They are described by others with such terms as intelligent, poised, forward-looking, innovative, ingenious, persevering, and enterprising.
Pattern 10.2 DOWN-TO-EARTH TYPE (High S, Low O) Down-To-Earth types avoid anxiety by not thinking and reflecting on things very often. They focus on what is happening in their own local area, and adhere to the values and ways of thinking that are typical for their locality. Their neighbors probably regard them as down-to-earth and full of common sense, but outside of their local area they may be regarded as unreflective, unsophisticated, imperceptive, and provincial.
Pattern 10.3 SENSITIVE TYPE (Low S, High O) Sensitive types are very bright but emotionally sensitive. They pay attention to, and are strongly affected by, things that happen in the world around them. They open themselves to their environment; consequently they enjoy many positive sensory experiences, but on the other hand they are vulnerable to having their feelings hurt. They are described by others as complex and imaginative.
Pattern 10.4 MUDDLED TYPE (Low S, Low O) Muddled types tend to be anxious about things that lie beyond their limited scope of understanding. They protect themselves by living in the past and showing contempt for novel or foreign ideas They are described by others as irritable, anxious, nervous, reminiscent, apathetic, unambitious, self-centered, unreliable, and negligent.
LII-Ne with strong EII tendencies, 6w7-9w1-3w4 so/sp/sx, INxP
The test that can be found on that website is the best one on the Big 5 I've found so far.
Your score on Extraversion is low, indicating you are introverted, reserved, and quiet. You enjoy solitude and solitary activities. Your socializing tends to be restricted to a few close friends.
Your score on Agreeableness is low, indicating less concern with others' needs Than with your own. People see you as tough, critical, and uncompromising.
Your score on Conscientiousness is low, indicating you like to live for the moment and do what feels good now. Your work tends to be careless and disorganized. Note: I used to be much more conscientious years ago... I am working on it... >_> (Actually, I might have been too extremely conscientious, and now I am being the opposite.)
Your score on Neuroticism is average, indicating that your level of emotional reactivity is typical of the general population. Stressful and frustrating situations are somewhat upsetting to you, but you are generally able to get over these feelings and cope with these situations.
Your score on Openness to Experience is high, indicating you enjoy novelty, variety, and change. You are curious, imaginative, and creative.
Pattern 4.3 BOOKWORMISH TYPE (Low E, High O)
Bookwormish Types are highly intellectual, introspective, self- examining loners. Although they keep to themselves, their level of intelligence and learning garners them respect for others. They are described by other persons as learned, well-read, persevering, rule-abiding, calm, and industrious.
Or
Pattern 9.3 FANCIFUL/IMAGINATIVE TYPE (Low C, High O) Fanciful/Imaginative Types are unconventional nonconformists who pride themselves on being different from others. They are not so much openly antisocial and disruptive in their behavior as they are fanciful, impractical, and unconcerned about the general welfare of others. They are described by others as complex, imaginative, and critical.
Or
Pattern 7.3 INDIVIDUALISTIC TYPE (Low A, High O)
Individualistic types consider themselves to be unique and more intelligent than most people around them. In extreme cases they might be regarded as eccentric, but in most cases they are perceived by others as complex, well-read, imaginative, and industrious.
At the moment, the second description applies the best to me. At my most natural and balanced self, I'm like the first description. Funny thing is, I really was a typical bookworm in my youth, spending almost all of my free-time reading.
Last edited by Olimpia; 05-18-2017 at 07:45 PM.
New Youtube [x] Get Typed! [x]
Celebs [x] Theory [x] Tumblr [x]
*********** 21-04-19: "Looks like a mystic that just arrived to battle and staring out at the battle, ready to unleash"
Makes more sense to me. Neuroticism makes very little sense to me (and also agreeableness) as it seems to include bit of emotionality in it. http://hexaco.org/
Gives a very detailed result.
avoidant, withdrawn, not usually happy, does not believe in human goodness, loner, moody, avoids crowds, depressed, overwhelmed by unpleasant feelings frequently, agnostic/atheistic tendencies, unsure where life is going, impatient, avoids eye contact, does not think things work out for the best, discontent, negative, suspicious of others, uncooperative, socially uncomfortable, hard to get to know, not punctual, low self confidence, pessimistic, lonely, does not finish work on time, does not like to lead, attracted to things associated with sadness, ambivalent about the problems of others, feels defective, fears failure, often bored, ambivalent about the suffering of others, unproductive, avoids unnecessary interaction, easily frustrated, does not finish many things, lower energy level, focuses on fantasies instead of reality, ambivalent about the needs of others, easily annoyed, rarely prepared, disorganized, quiet around strangers, slow to forgive, hard to understand, not that interested in others, skeptical, wounded at the core, self absorbed
Yeah I find those summaries at the similarminds site pretty good actually. RCOEN for me there and it's surprisingly good, too. Not 100% fitting but somehow there is a pattern in it that does fit unlike the other 31 summaries the site has .
Open-Mindedness
High scorers tend to be original, creative, curious, complex; Low scorers tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative. You enjoy having novel experiences and seeing things in new ways. (Your percentile: 88)
Conscientiousness
High scorers tend to be reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent. You probably have a messy desk! (Your percentile: 4)
(Yes, but only at home. At my job I'm more organized and orderly.)
Extraversion
High scorers tend to be sociable, friendly, fun loving, talkative; Low scorers tend to be introverted, reserved, inhibited, quiet. You are neither particularly social or reserved. (Your percentile: 59)
Agreeableness
High scorers tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, courteous; Low scorers tend to be critical, rude, harsh, callous. You find it easy to express irritation with others. (Your percentile: 32)
Negative Emotionality
High scorers tend to be nervous, high-strung, insecure, worrying; Low scorers tend to be calm, relaxed, secure, hardy. You aren't particularly nervous, nor calm. (Your percentile: 49)
20 years ago I had a significantly lower result on Extraversion and way higher on Negative Emotionality.
Open-Mindedness
High scorers tend to be original, creative, curious, complex; Low scorers tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative.
You enjoy having novel experiences and seeing things in new ways. (Your percentile: 83)
Conscientiousness
High scorers tend to be reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent.
You tend to do things somewhat haphazardly. (Your percentile: 20)
Extraversion
High scorers tend to be sociable, friendly, fun loving, talkative; Low scorers tend to be introverted, reserved, inhibited, quiet.
You probably enjoy spending quiet time alone. (Your percentile: 9)
Agreeableness
High scorers tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, courteous; Low scorers tend to be critical, rude, harsh, callous.
You find it easy to criticize others. (Your percentile: 2)
Negative Emotionality
High scorers tend to be nervous, high-strung, insecure, worrying; Low scorers tend to be calm, relaxed, secure, hardy.
You are a generally anxious person and tend to worry about things. (Your percentile: 98)
I think I'm a little more Agreeable... Improving Conscientiousness will probably reduce Negative Emotionality, right? //runs off to be lectured by Jordan Peterson about cleaning my room
Pattern 2.2 IMPULSIVE TYPE (High E, Low C) Impulsive Types are exhibitionists who act outrageously in order to attract attention from others. Often rather unconventional, risk- taking, flamboyant, they also need and enjoy social stimulation. They are described by others as talkative, outgoing, changeable, blunt, and outspoken.
Pattern 4.1 DEBONAIR TYPE (High E, High O) Debonair Types are intelligent extraverts. In their worldliness they can be quite witty and charming. They have a flair for the dramatic, and can be histrionic and theatrical. People are naturally attracted to debonair types, but if a debonair type dislikes somebody, he or she can swiftly cut that person to the quick. Therefore, this type is generally described with positive terms such as enterprising, eloquent, forward-looking, confident, and sexy, but can also be described as critical, candid, and intense.
If you are that low in Conscientiousness, I cannot see you as an extroverted rational type, especially not ENTj. They tend to score fairly high in Conscientiousness as a rule.
I tend to score Very high in conscientiousness (like the 96th percentile), around 85 in Openness, 75 or so in extroversion, 20 in Agreeableness lol and like 15 or so in Neuroticism (very calm and low stress individual).
That roughly correlates to an ENTj, at least in Jungian terms.
Shown below are your scores on the six broad "factor" scales and the 25 narrow "facet" scales of the HEXACO-PI-R. (Each factor scale is listed in bold, with its four facet scales indented below it. An additional facet scale, Altruism, is related to several factors and is listed separately.)
Orderliness is consistently low. Openness is relatively high. Extraversion is right on the fence. Emotional stability is about the same. Agreeableness is slightly more "no" than "si". This has always been a test to gauge mood for me. There's probably a reason why similarminds can recycle the same questions for different systems which recycle the same dichotomies where the results are more-or-less the same "types" with slightly different labels.
I disagree with style!~ And yeah I'm pretty closed to new experiences, I prefer to purify them not expand them. I can only be interested in like two things at a time.
I am always cognizant and conscientious but sometimes I plan out the times when I can get away with not giving a fuck, planned chaos is how I roll. It's not like spontaneity is a personality trait of mine no.
I wish I was higher in conscientiousness. I have to put a lot of effort into being that way because it does not come natural to me, but is something that I feel I should be.
But are you that way or not.
You cannot score zero if you actually are at least reliable and careful.
What aspects of personality does this tell me about?
There has been much research on how people describe others, and five major dimensions of human personality have been found. They are often referred to as the OCEAN model of personality, because of the acronym from the names of the five dimensions. Here are your results:
Open-Mindedness
High scorers tend to be original, creative, curious, complex; Low scorers tend to be conventional, down to earth, narrow interests, uncreative.
You enjoy having novel experiences and seeing things in new ways.
(Your percentile: 84)
Conscientiousness
High scorers tend to be reliable, well-organized, self-disciplined, careful; Low scorers tend to be disorganized, undependable, negligent.
You probably have a messy desk!
(Your percentile: 0)
Extraversion
High scorers tend to be sociable, friendly, fun loving, talkative; Low scorers tend to be introverted, reserved, inhibited, quiet.
You probably enjoy spending quiet time alone.
(Your percentile: 6)
Agreeableness
High scorers tend to be good natured, sympathetic, forgiving, courteous; Low scorers tend to be critical, rude, harsh, callous.
You tend to consider the feelings of others.
(Your percentile: 74)
Negative Emotionality
High scorers tend to be nervous, high-strung, insecure, worrying; Low scorers tend to be calm, relaxed, secure, hardy.
You are a generally anxious person and tend to worry about things.
(Your percentile: 96)
I wish I was higher in conscientiousness. I have to put a lot of effort into being that way because it does not come natural to me, but is something that I feel I should be.
Yes. And where is the correlation between Rationality and Conscientiousness?
If Rationality = Conscientiousness then I cannot be a LII-type, because my Conscientiousness is low.
Er, correlation is just that, a correlation. Two things being correlated is not the same as two things being equal. If we wanted to guess aster's type from the Big 5 results, the most reasonable guess would be IEI, but since it's a correlation only, it could still be some other type.
PS: maybe you are SLI if not LII? In case you are seriously considering retyping.
Correlation does not mean certainty.
SLI is a really bad typing for me, btw, because I have strong and , both valued and conscious.
I have clearly values of alpha quadra.
The only alternative type for me would be ILE.
God... please come back when you finally properly read my post.
SLI is a really bad typing for me, btw, because I have strong and , both valued and conscious.
I have clearly values of alpha quadra.
The only alternative type for me would be ILE.
I just think you are not alpha NT because they don't get stuck on this kind of detail.
Really? I'm not -PoLR.
Ok, it's not my strongest function, but not my weakest either.
And your are an -dom because you got stuck on your own judgement.
Think the unbelieveable — there are flaws in the socionics theory.
I suspected ILI from your photo, when I seen you roll your eyes at my pun it was characteristic of Fe PoLR in ILI, and your not seeing the wood for the trees style of critic with your conversation with Myst is also rather ILI too. Also some suspect Ne there. In short, that's it. Maybe I'll type you on the members thread when I'm not on my phone, but I've seen enough to say not LII is a strong possibility, almost certain.
My results are from November 2015 - December 2017. I have been slack with it since they send me a new survey every 30 days but I have only completed 7 of them. I have one due now.
I am dark green in the second image which compared my scores to others who are participating in this study. My results are pretty consistent for the most part but it keeps track of life events so you know what events affected your personality. It also tracks attachment style to different people in your life which I am not sharing because it is a moving graph but it does show attachments across time without the specific type of relationship in this graph.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
Yeah, I clearly see argumentative consistent behavoir from you.
Claiming you don't take Socionics as granted for sure and linking to a description of Socionics theory to back up your own statement.
Holy shit. It wasn't my intention to obtain a new highscore in thread derailment in this forum. Now I'm in an upper rank, I guess.
Originally Posted by at sirac son of sirac
I suspected ILI from your photo, when I seen you roll your eyes at my pun it was characteristic of Fe PoLR in ILI...
Yeah. Why not doing a poll about my type? The majority of the votes deceide what my type is.
As I stated in an other thread. Photo typing is unreliable.
How do you explain that a get along with SEI and ESE types really well?
----------------
Besides from this the confussion might also be the interpretation of the meaning of conscientiousness.
Internal judgement is more about consistency or invariance
External judgement is more about conscientiousness.
I got SCUEI, primary Inquisitive as usual (no-brainer). Years ago when I first took the test I scored as RLUEI, I wonder why Reserved/Limbic has changed while the other traits are stable. For SCUEI the career suggestions from similarminds are super funny, they told me to become an "international spy"
The Chae Nr. 007 feedback for the test is that it has too many questions about the area where you live at the end. I see the scientific reason there but it still makes me wonder if my friend from the FBI made that.
Yeah, I clearly see argumentative consistent behavoir from you.
I am an argumentative type, yes (I don't mean socionics type, just in general).
Claiming you don't take Socionics as granted for sure and linking to a description of Socionics theory to back up your own statement.
I don't take it for granted, no, but you asked about how there is correlation, so I linked to the relevant description. You assume a bit too many things about me.
Besides from this the confussion might also be the interpretation of the meaning of conscientiousness.
Internal judgement is more about consistency or invariance
External judgement is more about conscientiousness.
That sounds like MBTI now. That's a different theory.
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by maniac
.
, lol. Try some 
-ego type for Conscientiousness.
and 
, both valued and conscious.
-PoLR. 
