Is there such a thing as a lazy LSE?
Is there such thing as a lazy LSE/ESTj?
Is there such a thing as a lazy LSE?
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Me.
/farts
I hardly think there is. Especially if you're geared towards "productivity."
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Come wipe my butt =( I forgot how to Si myself, lol.
Is there such a thing as a stoner LSE?Originally Posted by Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Easy Day
ROFL
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I doubt it. But LSEs can be temporarily lazy on occasion.
Like most people. People are rarely lazy by nature. Some just seem sluggish but it's more complicated than that.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
thank you for answering your own question
Most description of LSE is just relaxing for a few minutes at a time, then bam ready to work.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Is there a reason as to why you make threads asking questions to which you already know the answer?
Are you really trying to come to her rescue over two off-hand posts I made over a year ago?She was asking if anybody had any other experiences different than what was contained in the descriptions. Seeing how accurate the current theory is. Over a year later, do you see this difference?
It continuously amuses me how people misunderstand Maritsa, and then attack her, but I seem to understand her perfectly. Maritsa, come live on my island with me.
If she wants to respond to my posts (which she never did), she can take that up on her own time. You don't need to play the white knight.
Dude, she is declaring type and we all know what that means. Maritsa knows shit and she doesn't need to ask anyone. And if it looks like she's asking something, it's actually just a kind of test. However, if we're too stupid she helps us by quickly answering the questions herself so we can't miss the right answer. Isn't that awesome?
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I'm just getting hooked on to trivialities. It's not healthy behavior for me because if I had a dual, I would be doing something more productive and not dwelling on things/situations/scenarios which don't produce any further conclusions. So yes, it's more conclusions, or Judgements of Thinker/objective nature that I'm trying to make out of something trivial, probably Te seeking. Probably seeking for more information.
I'm sure it suits you and your dual pair well to make convenient and ill founded conclusions based on assumptions without really understanding the subject at hand. I'm sure that helps both of you position yourselves in a position of power and authority. You're essentially saying that all I'm trying to do is feed you the answer I want you to have, hence I'm in the game for some power struggle and that you realize how to position yourself to counter this power that I'm trying to position against.
Shame.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Oh, you mean the thing you do 24/7?
Totally, me and my dual pals are the kings of this discussion.
No, I don't think that you try to force this opinion on us. I believe you don't care at all what we think (and that's why you also didn't need out input to find an answer to the question).
However, what I think is: You're making up shit about my intentions/motivations and use it to promote your typing of ILI for me.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
I noticed her doing that with me too.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
Is that a question or a statement?
Glad to hear. I'm sure that can only be a positive thing.
You just said I did in the above.
ah, now you're changing your story, having sensed some disapproval against you and now you have to add another story to make your story look legitimate. "It's not what I said, or what I meant but it's really this other thing."
Really, that's very immature. Just stick to ONE story, or is it that your type and your dual's type is incapable of sticking to one story (perhaps I should open up another thread to explore this angle some more - or is it another triviality?)
In short, it's called trumping people around. A behavior which I find less than appealing, certainly very cruel.
I did not invite you to respond to my thread and you didn't need an invitation, but having sense poor relations and inability to bring people closer, to form better relations with them, you could have done the better thing (who's to say what I say is better or worse?-another topic of exploration), and stayed away from me. "If you can't contribute something nice don't at all," but assuming some social etiquet holds, true, which I doubt it does in this or YOUR case.
It's obvious from the way you speak with me that I couldn't possibly ever value you as a quadra member.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She does it all the time.
It is an rhetorical question to make you aware of the irony of your statement.
No, I did not. If you're referring to my first post in this thread you might realize that I was being ironic as well on second thought.
As I said, I didn't change my "story", I'm just not agreeing with your interpretation of my behavior. You just think that you have understood what I said.
The same applies to me, but hell, you can't pick 'em, right?
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Now let's try an exercise; look back at your posts in this thread, are they criticisms?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
OK so now that you have recognized and identified the problem in yourself, why dont you try improving on that aspect of yourself instead of using socionics to make excuses for your weaknesses and relegating yourself to that stupid behavior because socionics might seem to "say" you're supposed to "be" that way. Recognizing ones weaknesses is the first step to changing that about yourself and there is no reason a human being cant perfect themselves, no matter what type they are.. I wouldn't count on waiting around for a dual to help fix all of your problems.
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
You need to go swimming. It will help you refresh yourself.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
so, i'm supposed to be taking advice from a self-admitted psychologically unhealthy person?
Enneagram: 9w1 6w5 2w3 so/sx
I know an LSE who was 'lazy' up until the age of 25. He took 6 years to graduate college with a 2-year degree, admitted he spent most of his time tailgating and partying.
But then a radical change occurred. He had an opportunity to start his own business, and then pursued that with every fiber in his body, every minute of his waking day doing something productive. After 4 years of insanely hard work, each week 80+ hours at the minimum, he was able to develop a 6-figure income for his family. He is now 33 and lives happily with his wife at home with their brand new baby girl.
His motto regarding laziness: "There are no lazy people, only uninspired people."
So, to answer the question, I think an LSE, just like anyone can be unproductive at times, but no, I would not say there is such thing as a "lazy LSE", or anyone for that matter.
You are unhealthy too and thus you've admitted several times, especially at you lamenting that you can't get men and I wonder why that is!
Anyway yes, take my advice.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Wait didn't you have that some Matt R Lohr or what's-his-name?
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Al Bundy
Well, genius research. If you take a group of people of equal "potential", those who try the hardest during the test have the best scores. Really impressive.
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
Ahahahah you make Maritsa's life a living hell, priceless
Obsequium amicos, veritas odium parit
You can't be in my quadra, Pa3s. You're too much of a, hmm, space miner.
I'd just like to remind people that you won't necessarily like every person in your own quadra, and it's unlikely you'll like every single dual you meet. Conversely, you could have a great relationship with someone opposite quadra as you.
You know what, Snaps? I don't think you're in my quadra as well, you snap fingers.
I'm glad we can agree on something.
Maritsa, post nudes or shut up. Jesus Christ.
My point being aboutis that it looks at what I've done already (as a compliment of Se) and extrapolates what I'm going to do in the future and doesn't let situations develop on their own accord, which is exactly what P-diddy is doing here
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
There are indeed times when I wish to live in a space station to orbit all those earthlings and send them a death ray or two...
Last edited by Pa3s; 07-04-2012 at 05:40 AM.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
my LSE neighbor was sitting next to me and a there was a beautiful light shining in the sky from afar. He took out his phone to take a picture of it and I said "it would be a nicer picture had that power line not been in the way." He agreed with me and said, "I should go take it from before that line so it's not in the picture, but I'm feeling lazy." Just as soon as he said that, he got up and went to take the picture...That's LSE form of "lazy" ...which is "yeah, I don't feel like it but it would be of better quality...so oust the feeling and do the job."
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
... Neat story.
Only LSEs ever of that sort of thing.
"[Scapegrace,] I don't know how anyone can stand such a sinister and mean individual as you." - Maritsa Darmandzhyan
Brought to you by socionix.com
ESIs just throw their phones to the wind and hope it takes a goddamn "good" picture before it hits the ground. It is artsy.
Lol. I had a friend who accidently dropped his camera out a train window, but was able to go out and snag it before the train left. It had taken a perfect photo of his head sticking out of the open window, face aghast as he watched it fall.
IEE 649 sx/sp cp
Reply With Quote
