Oh god, this old thread. Disregard everything what I said.
Oh god, this old thread. Disregard everything what I said.
“I tell you, freedom and human rights in America are doomed. The U.S. government will lead the American people in — and the West in general — into an unbearable hell and a choking life. - Osama bin Laden
Haha, nice, I would feel the same way with some of the thing I have written. FTW, some of your thread post seemed somewhat 'nail on head'.
Originally Posted by Agni
My sample size is nowhere near large enough to submit my experiences as empirical evidence of anything.
you were shocked at my innocent post, but not at aquagraph's. I'm gonna turn into a male soon, I promise.
Anyway I didn't say it was all based on first-hand experiences, sorry to disappoint. e.g. Never did anything with an Alpha or a Ni dominant type and this should change.
I didn't see his sex post, just the post where he said to disregard everything he said. Also, saying
"SEE was like this" is different than "SEEs are like this".
I'm a bit obsessed with observing and feeling the contraction of smooth muscle and the secretion of body fluids, so I enjoy giving oral sex as much as receiving it, usually much more than sex itself. I prefer a woman on top, various sitting positions, and I love to sixty-nine. Sweating and body odor are also attractive. Variation is the spice of life.
Ne creatives have beds (*frames) decorated with chains, metal violins on their walls ,and wolf skin on their floor, but other than that they are vanilla. They are turned on by music, films, and reading aloud (them). They are into heavy fragrances like opium or musk and exotic/vintage objects. Sometimes they find food and the act of eating obscenely sexual. Other than that they're vanilla.
Last edited by Amber; 05-25-2015 at 07:16 PM.
From all the quadras, Deltas are the most likely to enjoy calling someone and/or being called by someone "Daddy" or "Mommy" in a sexual context.
I see....
I don't know, you're still here
I am not into aggressor/bondage sex, neither does my dual.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
first time for everything
hahahaha
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I'm not into bondage, either ... or anything that feels artificial and pre-planned. I'm not sure real BSDM pref. can be explained through typology.
But aggressive and hard is good.
i prefer being dominated by a small boy
Sexual preference is not typology related.
Freud spoke about how sexual preferences, ie kinks, fetishes, deviations are often tied in with ones first encounters where they experienced an arousal, and this is pure chance.
I like it how some people wanna avoid talking about their own fetishes and try to go on tangents instead. (sublimation ....?)
I am prude as all shit! 24 1/2 years and counting and still pure. I don't even like wasting time talking about it. It'll happen when it'll happen and with just the right person.
What does that make me?
Naive
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
Also what the fuck does still pure even mean??
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
viiiiiirgin
In this day and age purity doesnt exist unless youre in some kind of weird cult or amish or something along those lines where youre sheltered from society.
Everything interests me but nothing holds me.
Sure, I was being sarcastic.
Depends how we define purity.
If we define it as a sexual abstinancy, then yes it's very much doable. It just takes some will and some naivete. This is IF we are defining it as a multiperson action.
If we, however, take a broader approach and define it as any form of sexual behaviour, then no it's nigh impossible(still, nothing's impossible!). In this day and age, yes, it's impossible to avoid various self-helps etc.
So, which of these is virginity? Pure in form or pure in essence?
What kind, then? Sweet and tender?
Strict morally it's body and spiritual morally it's mental and trenscedant morally it's spirit. It you want to be viewed as "pure" than that's all you have to be.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Purity / female honour as a pillar of self-identity still exists in much of the non-Western world. It is a social device and a foundational element in soteriological and spiritual practices.
I find the rabid obsession with it as both a positive (among traditionalists, etc.) and a negative (in this thread, etc.) to be one of the more interesting social phenomena.
Last edited by xerx; 06-06-2015 at 10:49 PM.
Purity exists in patriarchal cultures
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
It's a legit motivator when you're poor and lack birth control, which is where most of the world sits.
yoyoyo for serious here? yoyoy where do I find EII because they are the thing i've been missing my entire life, where do they hang out instead of greenpeace
Nah, it's not possible. Liar, talk for yourslef.
only rather general things
types with Se valued may like s&m things more often, than Si valued types
I view S&M as sublimated caretaker / infantile activity.
Rather evident agressor/victim interest to torture and humiliate each other. Beta and gamma practice. Not common for delta, maybe alpha.
Relates to negation of not valued Si (comfort) and to forcing (Se).
Maybe a bit of playful psychological torture but I do not know a beta NF who wants to be humiliated. Not saying they don't exist but humiliation is a total deal-breaker for me. Too much pride.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
As victims like to be conquered, they may like to feel themselves weak where humiliation may help (including physical discomfort and some pain). And agressors may symbolically take dualisation by taking role of victim. s&m may not be common for beta-gamma, but is more expected there. So you may personaly don't know such people, even if they talk to you about their sexual interests.
It may have soft forms. For example, any boundage is a kind of humiliation. Other may play roles like boss and secretary, or superhero and weak princess, etc - roles are not equal in level stronger/weaker and hence some humiliation exists.Not saying they don't exist but humiliation is a total deal-breaker for me.
I was ready to be really annoyed with your response but ok, I can see the role playing looking like that to others but I don't find that humiliating.
“My typology is . . . not in any sense to stick labels on people at first sight. It is not a physiognomy and not an anthropological system, but a critical psychology dealing with the organization and delimitation of psychic processes that can be shown to be typical.” —C.G. Jung
There's too much stuff going on under the umbrella of BDSM to generalize it to a quadra or two.
I find BDSM can occur in every Quadra; just that each Quadra practices it differently. And some Quadras are more prone to engage in it (Gamma and Delta, IMO. Alpha rather avoids it, and Beta is doing the Aggressor-Victim thing very organically, without any specific BDSM rules).
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
