I came here to learn out that what the fuck is my friends talking about, all I know is that I am an ESTJ, what ever it means. Hope you'll help me find out whats going on..
A nAll new to socionics..
I came here to learn out that what the fuck is my friends talking about, all I know is that I am an ESTJ, what ever it means. Hope you'll help me find out whats going on..
Last edited by rowdyness; 12-23-2011 at 03:11 AM. Reason: Spell check
hey. welcome.
Hello
1. What would you like to know about what's going on?
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 12-23-2011 at 06:32 AM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Your friends are pretty dumb and learn to spell.Originally Posted by rowdyness
Absurd, you'll find much more typos written by me so dont bother.
I am here to get familiar with the theory to understand what they're talking about. This might take a while I guess.
Hi, welcome.
I recommend browsing the translated articles and archives. Chatbox is around for questions.
Reason is a whore.
You may start here:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Don't be put off by Absurd. He doesn't understand that you were excited and that excitement made you type faster than you were able to think thus creating garbled words(or vice versa-think faster than type).
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 12-24-2011 at 05:42 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Eh?
I think you're on chloroform.
Sounds great.
Depending on his mood, Absurd, he may either cut you off or teach you some facts about himself; he is fire and ice, afterall and his response is very much dependent on his mood at the moment and the current circumstances. LSE are quite moody. I'm just preparing her/him to be more open towards people.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Listen here Frankenstein. That's being Fe dominant to me so get him(?) over to your quadra whatever quadra it is. That is, not mine.
He can cut me off whenever he wants, I don't want to cut him myself so it a better solution, I concur.
I don't even know him nor he knows me so tell your boyfriend to cut me off
I don't know this person and don't derail her/his thread, please
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You sound like you do, you're speaking pretty subjectively about him, that's enough for me.
Okay I won't but there is a person on here who does that all the time, I think you should investigate it.
Maritsa, I wont get put off by him. But there will be typos, not because of excitement. That's just the way I do. I just can't notice them by myself.
You have to hire few people and pay them really good to do it for you.
Might work.
We have a deal then, drop me a tenner and I'm going to replace few with one, namely mua.
I confirm you're LSE and will add you to my list of types
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That's the spirit.
I think I'm not worthy to be on your list Maritsa. Erase me from there.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
