I guess it will be easy to type him by a video about his every day activities:
I suck at typing, but he has sth wrong with and seems to be focused on (or another way round)...
I guess it will be easy to type him by a video about his every day activities:
I suck at typing, but he has sth wrong with and seems to be focused on (or another way round)...
Last edited by kandaczka; 04-30-2012 at 07:19 PM.
him.. SEE, maybe.
Perhaps he is EIE or LIE. VI tells me little about you, but you sound like Fi-Base.
And I don't buy in that's his daily activity, it's obvious acting. Though it is good if you still like to believe so, don't expect everyone to swallow it .
You don't know why you love him or you don't know why we should type him?
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
did you smell haywired ? How?
it's not compliment from ILE's mouth xDVI tells me little about you, but you sound like Fi-Base.
I love , but Im not sure if I have it in 1/2 functions
it must be, I shot it, so I dont rlly know about whom this video says moreThough it is good if you still like to believe so
You don't know why you love him or you don't know why we should type him?
Do we look like conflictors?
Last edited by kandaczka; 12-01-2011 at 04:56 PM.
Will get back to you tomorrow. Welcome to the forum, by the way.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hi Maritsa Id rlly like to have reason to mark your post as contructive...
He wrote "I've learned a lot of stability with you"
and I answered "Beacause of u Ive changed my attitude towards some feelings into positive"
what kind a relation may it be? it feels like some negative one.
what type do I look like?
I feel as though the video doesn't reveal much about him, or his personality. One major factor is that he doesn't speak at all. The second major factor is that he's obviously acting, and every reaction, and even his walk, is scripted, so tough to VI imo.
I don't really know much about you yet either, kandaczka.
What I'm getting at is, although I know you're very curious to figure out the relationship between you and your boyfriend, we need more information about each of you separately, to get a good typing on each of you.
From your VI pictures, I'd say Introverted, possibly Ethical.
Tell us about yourself. What do you do for a living? What do you like to do for fun? What don't you like?
Looks like somebody I know in real life, didn't bother with typing this person. It's two different worlds, apart, though.
You are very hard to type by VI; I'm having a difficult time. Is there any way you can post a side picture of you with your hair back and from the shoulder's up (this is my VI theory) Thanks.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Can you talk a bit about yourself? I can't tell your type really, but maybe a NT of some sort?
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
That is interesting point. Sounds very likeable.
Last edited by kandaczka; 04-30-2012 at 07:20 PM.
Fe role types can do this.
LSE; that's why they call them "controlling"
This comes from their expectation of people's behaviors, specifically they expect others to be perfect or carry on in the manner in which they do, not of course seeing that sometimes their manners are inappropriate.
Mistrustful is an LSE thing; because they have weak but valued Fi and because they are negativists and so they often feel that people are bad unless proven good.
What do you mean by "strange sense of time/situation"?
If you mean that they focus on their own mistakes too much, this is because they are again a negativist type. Nothing can ever be good enough for them. How is his work ethic?
You just answered my question and yes he is an LSE; is he very emotional?
in private, how are you two?
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 12-21-2011 at 06:44 AM.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I think he is some Fe dominant and you are a Ti dominant. Not sure which ones though.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
After watching that video I feel almost certain that he is my identical. Some of his body movements and expressions are eerily familiar and watching him makes me feel self-conscious.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
The creepy acid line beginning at 1:30 is great
"The final delusion is the belief that one has lost all delusion."
-- Maurice Chapelain