The flaw in socionics typing

[Hitta]

I'm going to note before I write what I have to say and post the image, that I am not suggesting that function sets will combine in the exact way that I have listed in the image. The point I'm trying to make is that people may have an overarching type, but it doesn't really sum up the person well.

Every single interaction in life codes us in a specific way. Even though we may identify with one type, it doesn't mean that we are purely that one type. We are a combination an extreme range of interactions that combine together that gives us an overall personality, so attempting to completely identify with an idealist set(a personality type) will always fail.

[Hitta]

Also, in no way am I suggesting you try to model yourself on a binary level.

[Beautiful sky]

We need to figure out the genetics so we can just do it with a blood tests and then there won't be any disputes.

[rat1]

I am undergoing the must fucked up but beautiful thinking patterns about reality and all of you right now. Basically I want to fuck every one of you sluts and do whatever it takes with a few dudes in the way toward the final one to fuck for a while. But that is all I gota say about that, for those that are asking. This is radio 1 0 2 niner reporting out

[Hitta]

We need to figure out the genetics so we can just do it with a blood tests and then there won't be any disputes.

please don't attempt to figure out people's socionics code.... smoke some weed meth or crack instead.... do something constructive

[Ave]

We need to figure out the genetics so we can just do it with a blood tests and then there won't be any disputes.

[Aquagraph]

Without reading any of the thread, I say that all models -like all tools off any sort- are inaccurate, incomplete and never fully incomprehensive.

[Jonathan]

Every single interaction in life codes us in a specific way. Even though we may identify with one type, it doesn't mean that we are purely that one type. We are a combination an extreme range of interactions that combine together that gives us an overall personality, so attempting to completely identify with an idealist set(a personality type) will always fail.

At last....Something you've said that I really agree with.

[Hitta]

Well no, but some people expect it to.

Also, when it comes to typing people, people tend to cue onto different aspects of the person, therefore they come to the conclusion of a different type, even though what they both see is somewhat accurate.

[rat1]

Basically change and matter both exist simultaneously in varying proportions, and socionics focuses too much on change but neglects material structure; not from a within-model standpoint but from a existential standpoint. Or should I say Taurus = Scorpio, Because Pisces over Virgo.