Results 1 to 22 of 22

Thread: Is Enneagram theory completely separate from Socionics?

Hybrid View

  1. #1

    Join Date
    May 2011
    Posts
    150
    Mentioned
    3 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default Is Enneagram theory completely separate from Socionics?

    Are ennegram types completely separate from socionics? or...not? Thanks!

  2. #2

    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    TIM
    INFj sub (Fi+Ne)/2
    Posts
    449
    Mentioned
    2 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Some say thats 2 totally different system, some say its a bit related to socionic or mbti, and imo, they are.
    The problem is that you can read various unrelated description for one type, but the pattern I see is :

    1 : , but ISTJ seem to correspond too
    2 :
    3 :
    4 : and perhaps , althought I would more say 5w4 or 5w6 or something like that
    5 :
    6 :
    7 :
    8 :
    9 : ( aspirationnal is obvious in some description)
    "The final delusion is the belief that one has lost all delusion."

    -- Maurice Chapelain

  3. #3
    Cat King Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    TIM
    IIEE so/sp 4w5
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by noid View Post
    Some say thats 2 totally different system, some say its a bit related to socionic or mbti, and imo, they are.
    The problem is that you can read various unrelated description for one type, but the pattern I see is :

    1 : , but ISTJ seem to correspond too
    2 :
    3 :
    4 : and perhaps , althought I would more say 5w4 or 5w6 or something like that
    5 :
    6 :
    7 :
    8 :
    9 : ( aspirationnal is obvious in some description)
    I'd revise this somewhat.

    1: logic + rationality.
    2:
    3: not FP
    4:
    5: logic + introtim
    6: dominance, intuition? based on possible mistypes in the community. possibly also generic childhood abuse type.
    7: extratim + irrational
    8: extratim + sensing
    9: judicious + introtim

    withdrawn types are by definition introtim. aggressive types are by definition extratim. complaint does not have a direct socionics equivalent.
    Know I'm mistyped?


    Why I am now.
    Why I was , once.

    DISCLAIMER
    The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.

  4. #4
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cat King Cole View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by noid View Post
    Some say thats 2 totally different system, some say its a bit related to socionic or mbti, and imo, they are.
    The problem is that you can read various unrelated description for one type, but the pattern I see is :

    1 : , but ISTJ seem to correspond too
    2 :
    3 :
    4 : and perhaps , althought I would more say 5w4 or 5w6 or something like that
    5 :
    6 :
    7 :
    8 :
    9 : ( aspirationnal is obvious in some description)
    I'd revise this somewhat.

    1: logic + rationality.
    2:
    3: not FP
    4:
    5: logic + introtim
    6: dominance, intuition? based on possible mistypes in the community. possibly also generic childhood abuse type.
    7: extratim + irrational
    8: extratim + sensing
    9: judicious + introtim

    withdrawn types are by definition introtim. aggressive types are by definition extratim. complaint does not have a direct socionics equivalent.
    I like these Cat, I'm sure those listed functions and types are more likely to correspond to those Enneagram types. However, I'm sure you will find several exceptions to those. IMO, Socionics does correspond to Enneagram, but only to a limited extent. This is why you'll find very different types with the same Enneagrams.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  5. #5
    Cat King Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    TIM
    IIEE so/sp 4w5
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
    I like these Cat, I'm sure those listed functions and types are more likely to correspond to those Enneagram types. However, I'm sure you will find several exceptions to those. IMO, Socionics does correspond to Enneagram, but only to a limited extent. This is why you'll find very different types with the same Enneagrams.
    I'm presently of the opinion that Withdrawn Extrotims and Aggressive Introtims are paradoxical notions, and thus completely impossible. Other than that, yeah, fair game.
    Know I'm mistyped?


    Why I am now.
    Why I was , once.

    DISCLAIMER
    The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.

  6. #6
    Raver's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    TIM
    Ne-IEE 6w7 sp/sx
    Posts
    4,921
    Mentioned
    221 Post(s)
    Tagged
    3 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cat King Cole View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Traveler View Post
    I like these Cat, I'm sure those listed functions and types are more likely to correspond to those Enneagram types. However, I'm sure you will find several exceptions to those. IMO, Socionics does correspond to Enneagram, but only to a limited extent. This is why you'll find very different types with the same Enneagrams.
    I'm presently of the opinion that Withdrawn Extrotims and Aggressive Introtims are paradoxical notions, and thus completely impossible. Other than that, yeah, fair game.
    I fit into the Withdrawn Extratim label quite well IRL. I also know introverts that can be very aggressive and social. It is paradoxical if you think the reasons they exist is because of Socionics. However, I think Introverted Extratims and Extraverted Introtims are that way as a result of factors unrelated to Socionics imo.
    “We cannot change the cards we are dealt, just how we play the hand.” Randy Pausch

    Ne-IEE
    6w7 sp/sx
    6w7-9w1-4w5

  7. #7
    Grand Inquisitor Bardia's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2007
    TIM
    ESI
    Posts
    1,251
    Mentioned
    7 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Two completely different systems. People here like to correlate them together imperfectly.
    “No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov

    http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
    http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0

  8. #8
    Cat King Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    TIM
    IIEE so/sp 4w5
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    These correlations blow chunks of sloppy ass.
    Yeah. As it stands the enneagram isn't tied to any measurable psychology. Rather than playing around with neurotransmitters, they'd be better served by rising above the pseudoscience of certainty and correlating with what we know of Big 5.
    Know I'm mistyped?


    Why I am now.
    Why I was , once.

    DISCLAIMER
    The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.

  9. #9
    Banned
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    8,098
    Mentioned
    60 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Cat King Cole View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    These correlations blow chunks of sloppy ass.
    Yeah. As it stands the enneagram isn't tied to any measurable psychology. Rather than playing around with neurotransmitters, they'd be better served by rising above the pseudoscience of certainty and correlating with what we know of Big 5.
    It's been done. See full report.

    I haven't read this yet, but there might be some good ideas in there for how to do the same with socionics.

  10. #10
    Cat King Cole's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2011
    TIM
    IIEE so/sp 4w5
    Posts
    735
    Mentioned
    1 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Interesting. I'll read through this while sober and more able to adequately apply scepticism to the research and researchers.
    Know I'm mistyped?


    Why I am now.
    Why I was , once.

    DISCLAIMER
    The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.

  11. #11
    Arete GuavaDrunk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Now in stores near you.
    TIM
    IEI-Fe (9)62 sx/?
    Posts
    1,586
    Mentioned
    108 Post(s)
    Tagged
    1 Thread(s)

    Default

    Two totally different systems. The Enneagram is about types of deeply-ingrained defense mechanisms. Socionics is about cognition methods, or filters. There may be correlations due to cognition type biasing people towards certain reactions for eg, but direct correspondences are highly unlikely.
    Reason is a whore.

  12. #12
    Hello...? somavision's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    London
    Posts
    1,466
    Mentioned
    8 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Ashton View Post
    Quote Originally Posted by Cat King Cole View Post

    Yeah. As it stands the enneagram isn't tied to any measurable psychology. Rather than playing around with neurotransmitters, they'd be better served by rising above the pseudoscience of certainty and correlating with what we know of Big 5.
    It's been done. See full report.

    I haven't read this yet, but there might be some good ideas in there for how to do the same with socionics.
    This is very interesting
    IEE-Ne

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •