Hey what's up Delta. 4 month thread bump, yeeeaaaahhhh.
Oh thanks for unearthing this thread; this is why I typed Minde SEI; because she and ESC both responded negativistly to that same situation.
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
LOL
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Why did you change again? Did the Alphas kick you out of their quadra?
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Hey MD. I understand you seem greatly annoyed at the changing. I'm still considering ESE as a possibility, you may still be right for my typing after all. And no, the Alphas have been extremely nice, and have never counted me out. I changed again because I think there's a definite possibility I may be LSE, and that when I joke around and get really expressive, I come across Fe-ish. But in truth, as motivated as I am to help people, I do unintentionally offend others ethically. While as ESE I viewed that as Fi ignoring, or being bold in my values, I'm considering it to just be a potentially weak Fe. I hope that makes sense to you.
I posted the "To everyone: I'm going to be LSE now, k? K. Thx." on the other thread as a joke... of course I knew switching types again would cause lots of controversy. And that it wouldn't be as simple as 'ok'. I'm not asking you to accept my choice: I didn't change types to 'force people to see me the way I want to be seen' as so many people suspect, but I changed because it's an honest reflection of my current self-typing.. leaning more towards LSE now than ESE. But of course, you're still entitled to believe what you want.
Know I'm mistyped?
Why I am now.
Why I was , once.
DISCLAIMER
The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.
absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd absurd
Hi Delta.
Going ENFp now. Why not? Hehe.
Sorry for all the changing, I like keeping an open mind.
Basically, Krig's argument that I'm IEE got me thinking, and both IEE and ESE were the 2 main types suggested back when I started. Something lately still feels off with ESE, and most agree I'm not LSE, but then nothing fit... and then IEE gets suggested, which I forgot about a while ago! Makes sense: I like to keep an open-mind, jump on new ideas, and defend them. I like commenting on trends, being a sort of 'social arbitrator' and defending people who get picked on, I can get under people's skins as I understand they like/dislike. I don't really use Ni, as others have commented so much, so Ni ignoring makes sense, and Fe demonstrative makes sense as well. A lot of things make sense w/ IEE. So I'll type as such for now.
Oh god help us all....
-
Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
MD, Galen and myself are now all identicals! AWESOME!
Know I'm mistyped?
Why I am now.
Why I was , once.
DISCLAIMER
The statements expressed in this signature may not necessarily reflect reality.
IEE is a type I've been thinking about for 3 weeks or so now. Wasn't a completely impulsive decision. Made sense, and I was thinking through some of the intricacies for some time... and after a few weeks, of it making sense, and also a type that people originally suggested for me before, when I joined over a year ago, and a type that's been suggested here and there through the months, I decided to pull the trigger.
Haha. Always wondered what "IIEE" was supposed to mean.
Nothing funny about that, I happen to have beta tickets. I bet you heard that song, one way ticket to...
Just saying, I was a bit pissed as well when foreign elements were dropping on my roof from the sky. Frigging UFOs. But some started bitching I don't get along with people, so I took it down a notch, I think.