i
Alpha
Beta
SEE
ESI
LIE
Delta
Charmander
t t t t type me
i
Last edited by Anglas; 05-03-2015 at 06:43 PM.
SEE
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
There is absolutely nothing in your post that makes me doubt that you are an SEE; I don't think you need to consider any other typing.
It might be possible you confused yourself with ur activity as well.... ENTj.
The constant need for stimulation, taking action instead of reflecting, the disliking criticism and rudeness from others, the avoiding talking about your weaknesses, saying that you hate silence. Also the fact that other people have called you too harsh.
A lot of signs point to a Si polr to me... I need to see a picture of you more or something.
Thank you for your thoughts, I remain to SEE type, for now it's most reasonable. As for the photos, here you are if it helps
Last edited by Anglas; 12-15-2012 at 02:02 PM.
Yeah, rather LIE. Cold, impersonal, rational, apparently dispassionate. No mention about (close) people, likes/dislikes about them, personal values, etc. Your other posts are on the same line, short and to the point.
(young Elvis Presley)
you have a similar kind of sadness radiating from the eyes as Elvis Presley (ESFp). i was somehow immediately reminded of him.
i'm betting on the self-typing deniers being wrong as usual.
Based off of the answers to your questions you seem SEE, but over time we shall see. Sometimes it is easy to subconsciously answer questions by what type we think we are. It is one of the flaws in a question style analysis.
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
true, but I'm not trying to do that way. I just want to find out my typeOriginally Posted by Bardia
could be true, but my native language is not english, so sometimes I'm out of words.Your other posts are on the same line, short and to the point.
So for now I decline ESE and will consider LIE
Yea I wasn't trying to accuse you of doing that. I just think it is common for people to do that kind of thing without trying because we have a current idea of what we are supposed to be like. I think continuing interaction will better bring out your type.true, but I'm not trying to do that way. I just want to find out my type
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
I added poll, so vote vote vote!
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
