Socionics doesn't exist

[Creepy-EddieMorra]

Hate to break it you folks, but socionics doesn't exist. It is merely a figment of your imagination. I realized this once I took the pill, that there is no such thing as personality types, but merely personality fragments. The only true type is XXXX, the rest of you are incomplete douchebags.

So continuing praying to your false religion like so:



Oh socionics, hallowed be thy personality type.

[717495]

What the heck is socionics?

[krieger]

[Korpsy Knievel]

I sure wish my parents had bought me a tape dispenser when I was a kid.

[Crispy]

@ immediate dismissal rather than consideration of evidence
One less tool in the tool-set for you.

[Trevor]

What's your type, EddieMorra?

[Slacker]

OMG you are a troll I'm so sad. I thought we had something special.

[Creepy-EddieMorra]

@ immediate dismissal rather than consideration of evidence
One less tool in the tool-set for you.

Socionics doesn't exist unless scientific evidence is provided, until then it is merely a theory and a poor one at that. Neurologists must identify parts of the brain that are more developed or less developed as a result of one's personality type. Talking about the theory without this crucial scientific evidence turns socionics into an over analysis of concepts filled with air.

[Crispy]

@ you thinking the world was flat UNTIL we discovered it wasn't
You are a HOOT.

[rat1]

Socionics doesn't exist unless scientific evidence is provided.

philosophy fail

[aestrivex]

Socionics doesn't exist unless scientific evidence is provided, until then it is merely a theory and a poor one at that. Neurologists must identify parts of the brain that are more developed or less developed as a result of one's personality type. Talking about the theory without this crucial scientific evidence turns socionics into an over analysis of concepts filled with air.

what a ton of bullshit. a criticism of the concepts within the theory of socionics is one thing, but you're just stating that in the absence of neuroscientific evidence (giving no evidence you understand what that evidence would mean) all personality models are useless. go do your epistemology homework again; i give you a failing grade.

[Jarno]

Socionics doesn't exist unless scientific evidence is provided, until then it is merely a theory and a poor one at that. Neurologists must identify parts of the brain that are more developed or less developed as a result of one's personality type. Talking about the theory without this crucial scientific evidence turns socionics into an over analysis of concepts filled with air.

i posted an article about this some time ago.

The first function, like Jung's types, is 100x more efficient than the other functions.
That's what I remember.

BTW your own definition of science is incorrect. But I don't go into that anymore, you can read a book about it.

[somavision]

Socionics doesn't exist unless scientific evidence is provided, until then it is merely a theory and a poor one at that. Neurologists must identify parts of the brain that are more developed or less developed as a result of one's personality type. Talking about the theory without this crucial scientific evidence turns socionics into an over analysis of concepts filled with air.

I'm assuming this is a troll, however if not...

This is non-sense... trait theories of personality have been well established and recognised within mainstream psychology for some time, [see Costa and McCrae, Goldberg etc], whilst some work has been done to link the observed traits [e.g. extraversion and introversion was linked by Hans Jurgen Eysenck to differences in cortical arousal controlled by the ARAS.] these theories developed from empirically observed data. There is no fundamental requirement to have direct understanding of the neurological mechanisms that result in the patterns observed from psychometric testing to demonstrate that the patterns exist.

Of course socionics is different in that it makes some larger claims than other personality theories. However the core of the theory is observable and consistent in everyday interactions, and when focusing purely on valued functions, I've never met a fully developed, seld aware adult who doesn't identify with the concept of valued and unvalued functions. In fact so much of the basis can be attributed to a universal common sense theory [e.g. Ne is incompatible with Se] that it has a very natural elegance to it's logical construct. Socionics is an interesting and useful tool, not something to worship, but something to observe, test and learn from.


EDIT: Shit I Bit.

[Timeless]

Hate to break it you folks, but socionics doesn't exist. It is merely a figment of your imagination. I realized this once I took the pill, that there is no such thing as personality types, but merely personality fragments.

+
-
-

The only true type is XXXX, the rest of you are incomplete douchebags.

So continuing praying to your false religion like so:



Oh socionics, hallowed be thy personality type.

-DS

Socionics doesn't exist unless scientific evidence is provided, until then it is merely a theory and a poor one at that. Neurologists must identify parts of the brain that are more developed or less developed as a result of one's personality type. Talking about the theory without this crucial scientific evidence turns socionics into an over analysis of concepts filled with air.

+

You fail to understand what I wrote before. All personality types are personality fragments therefore they cannot be true personality types. I am the only true personality type because I am all of them, hence socionics only exists for me.

+

Wow! What a concident! I took the same pill and I just realized all of you don't exist. You are all a figment of my imagination.

Clearly you didn't take the pill or else you'll spell coincidence* correctly.

+
+

You'll've*?

NZT improves spelling, not grammar.

+

I am a dual to every single type because I am every single type.

-
-HA

 

ILI/INTp

[EyeSeeCold]

Hate to break it you folks, but socionics doesn't exist. It is merely a figment of your imagination. I realized this once I took the pill, that there is no such thing as personality types, but merely personality fragments.

+
-
-


-DS


+


+


+
+


+

I am a dual to every single type because I am every single type.

-
-HA

 

ILI/INTp

Aixelsyd, is that you?

[Sumer1an]

Guess what guys!?!? SOCIONICS DOESNT EXIST!

anyway.... http://www.humanthermodynamics.com/
I guess america is developing its own more scientific version of socionics. seems cool...