Hello I have returned after over 4 years

[Raver]

It has been a long four years since I've been in this forum. I believe the last time was April 2007. I was about 21 then, now I'm 25. My first name was Young and Confused, then I changed my name to Traveler. I'd thought I never return to this place to be honest.

However, after thinking I was ENFP for like 7 years, since I was 18, and then coming to the realization recently that I'm most likely an INTP was definitely a shock. Anyways, realizing the only people I hung out with were mainly gammas, realizing I came across to people as someone that was shy/unemotional and reading the INTP description, which fit me to a tee made me come to this conclusion.

I see a few regulars here, but most of the people here are pretty new. Well, I'm just here to get some answers, how long I'll be here, I don't know. All I can say is I am definitely not young and confused about life like I was when I joined this forum at 19, now I'm definitely young and aware after gaining more life experience, hence the new name. So I guess this is me rejoining this forum as a different personality and as a more mature person, let's see how it goes this time around.

[Not A Communist Shill]

Welcome back....hope you are not disappointed with your return.

[717495]

Salutations.

[Creepy-bg]

wb

[1981slater]

Hello!

The more I know, the more I realize I don't know

[Gilly]

Wow, its been a while. Welcome back.

[Gilly]

Cognitive styles are actually very useful IMO. Give it a look.

[DirectorAbbie]

Cognitive styles are actually very useful IMO. Give it a look.

I know they are, but it seems everyone else thinks of them differently than I learned, and I'm not going to rename stuff just to make communication easier.

[Absurd]

There is no proof that an IEE can't be a 5.

There's no proof IEEs can't be E1 as well.

Cognitive styles are actually very useful IMO. Give it a look.

Taken from cognitive styles:

3.2) Social Level

On the social level, differences between these approaches can be contrasted as naturality/artificiality. By 'naturality' I refer to primal behavior inherent to nature, and by 'artificiality' I refer to behavior accepted by society. For example, in nature, survival of the fittest is law, whereas in society, protection and care of the weak is cultivated.

This is completely flawed. Either the author doesn't know what the heck he is talking about or he doesn't know what the heck is he talking about.

Either way, people do find it useful just to tip-toe between one or the other, allegedly settling on one and exhibiting the other.

[FreelancePoliceman]

Raver, welcome back!