I'm an LSE because I owe it to Maritsa for being mean to her. LSE it is.
I'm an LSE because I owe it to Maritsa for being mean to her. LSE it is.
Sure have been.Originally Posted by Maritsa33
I didn't see that ugly post you made. So. You're a procrastinating SLE...I concur.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Good. We agree. What is the next step?
You're kind of clueless...My LSE friend just txt me last night to tell me he's being lazy because he's suppressing his emotions and that's causing lack of motivation and action where he wants to direct them and because of this he wanted me to help him, by listening to his feeling and thoughts, to sort them out and give him help to come out of this slump...would you say he's been procrastinating by staying in bed all day, feeling a little down?
You do not understand human nature, my dear, nor do you understandand how that affects individual response to stressors/stimuli/feelings. I do...you just continue making Se And putting all that in Ti...there's no system to understand what depression does to people, even highly productive "kinds" of people.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
You're kind of clueless...you've typed yourself incorrectly! And you type everyone else incorrectly.
LOL what type do you think I am than...I welcome suggestions like this. It helps me focus on my counter arguments and perfect them.You're kind of clueless...you've typed yourself incorrectly! And you type everyone else incorrectly.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't like to argue with the likes of you.
I don't like to argue with the likes of you.
Oh well, maybe when you observe my relationships, you can draw better conclusions.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
I don't have the time to analyze 7.6k posts to "observe" your relationships. You just bleed of Fe.
Oh well, maybe when you observe my relationships, you can draw better conclusions.
What about my need for Te? And that I'm a process type; and that I subject external experiences to my subjective feelings?
I have to have my environment secure/consistent/protective, routine, make rules for things, structure them.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Consciously or subconsciously?
What about my need for Te? And that I'm a process type; and that I subject external experiences to my subjective feelings?
It was subconsciously at first; than when I discovered Socionics, it all bled to consciousness and now it's WHAT I WANT AND NEED. Myself is an unorganized woman who LOVES the likes of Te.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Why do you want to be dominated by a man?
Why do you want to be dominated by a man?
Topic for another thread...
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Let's begin with VI.
Good one.
I see the similarities: The eyes, and the unibrow that was once there.Let's begin with VI.
I'm a bit shameful/embarrassed and unnatural of physical processes, that puts a strain on my Se PoLR. I want you to be you, naturally, but could you keep the comments away from me, please
I'm trying to be more comfortable with them. I like my duals who don't usually make compliments or fun of, even if it's just observatory remarks that are innocent.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Change your avatar and you won't have to be shameful of physical processes, stereotyper.I'm a bit shameful/embarrassed and unnatural of physical processes, that puts a strain on my Se PoLR. I want you to be you, naturally, but could you keep the comments away from me, please
My avatar is me, I just don't want people to point things out about me.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Ok now you're making fun of me and are being like Ricky Gervais...
Please excuse me, but i no longer want to engage in a conversation with you because conflict is building up inside me...Have a nice time here.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Do I win?
Is that an EII to the left? Or just David Spade?
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Do I win?
Is that an EII to the left? Or just David Spade?
INTp is becoming more apparent.
...if that behaviour is INTp-like I have no problem choosing my type anymore.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
Why'd you have a problem in the first place? Loser.
Oh, I am the Loser?I don't think so. You probably don't know better.
„Man can do what he wants but he cannot want what he wants.“
– Arthur Schopenhauer
You're probably wrong.Oh, I am the Loser?
Fixed.
Where are you from?
From Romania.
Ah, that's why you write like a retarded 10-year-old.
This thread delivers.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Most likely
Yeah because ESTps are so introverted and daydream all the time.
I demand you do impressions of Family Guy.
(i)NTFS
An ILI at rest tends to remain at rest
and an ILI in motion is probably not an ILI
♫ 31.9FM KICE Radio ♫ *56K Warning*
My work on Inert/Contact subtypes
Socionics Visual Identification(V.I.) Database
Socionics Tests Database
Comprehensive List of Socionics Sites
Fidei Defensor
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
