http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Jung/types.htm
Fi is in those pages. But, if you expect someone to breast feed you the answer then go ahead and don't read.
http://psychclassics.yorku.ca/Jung/types.htm
Fi is in those pages. But, if you expect someone to breast feed you the answer then go ahead and don't read.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Those examples make me want to vomit too. LOL.
Those are both AWFUL.
I share Eunice's preference for more subtle communication of feelings. Subtlety > cheeseball floweriness.
lol yeah..I'm trying to think what type would appreciate that and i'm at a loss..I think anyone with half a brain and maturity would find that really off-putting. I guess that was a bad example, lol!Originally Posted by Song
ahaha. i actually thought those were kind of cute, just because they reminded me of what it feels like to be stupidly infatuated. not because they were brilliantly written or captured emotion really well or anything. it just looks to me like someone who has kind of lost their head with feelings, lol. i wouldn't attribute them to Fi at all.
Yeah, I thought they were cute, too lol. Sounds like a romantic IEI.
Why not ?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote