No. You've read Jung's work and you can remember what it says.Originally Posted by Ashton
No. You've read Jung's work and you can remember what it says.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Yeah I concur that the OP quotes don't sound at all Fi. It sounds way too overbearing and direct in its emotional content, whereas Fi (at least sane Fi) is much more subtle and implicit in its emotionality.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote