Socionics test with a VI component

[Galen]

Anyone else find it weird that this test consistently gives the 4 highest results as all being in the same club (NF, ST, etc)?

[717495]

I always get my top results as IP types. I'm pretty 'either or' when it comes to T/F and N/S, where as I and P are my strong dichotomies. Hmm actually the way the test puts ST and SF clubs and I don't find myself relating much to.

[Slacker]

I got IEE, but I question the usefulness of the Vi section. I kept thinking, "I don't care in the slightest."

[golden]

EIE-1Ni aka ENFj, The Actor, and Ethical Intuitive Extrovert
Other Possible Types

IEE (ENFp): 83% as likely as EIE
EII (INFj): 80% as likely as EIE
IEI (INFp): 72% as likely as EIE

- - - - -

I struggled with this test, although I really support the attempt to make a test and to introduce the VI element.

Ananke raised the issue that caused me the most trouble: false dichotomies. I also took exception to abstracting being opposed to concrete thinking, for the same reason, which is that intelligent people will be better at abstract thought regardless of their preferred IEs.

Some of the questions were phrased in (and, I guess, conceived in) ways that seemed removed from everyday life and lifted from typology. Transparently.

I also would be happy if I could take the VI test separately OR just see the results of it calculated apart from the written portion of the test. Curious about it, that's all.

There is one question about intro- versus extraversion that seems to draw on the "draining/recharging battery" idea, and I don't know--is that Jungian, is it Socionics, is it accurate? I've never known what to make of that notion, because I get highly energized in dealing with people and groups that I love or that matter to me, and drained by social interactions that I find unfulfilling.

Lastly, I had to begin this test three times. The first time it completely froze in the VI portion. The second time I didn't move enough sliders on page 1 to go to page 2, but when I went back to move more sliders, it never registered.

[squark]

Anyone else find it weird that this test consistently gives the 4 highest results as all being in the same club (NF, ST, etc)?

it didn't with me. but that ILE result should be more like .00000001% as likely, hah, and nowhere in my top results.

Sociotype: LSI-1Ti
aka ISTj, The Inspector, , and Logical Sensing Introvert
Other Possible Types
SLE (ESTp): 97% as likely as LSI
ILE (ENTp): 65% as likely as LSI
SLI (ISTp): 64% as likely as LSI

[Park]

The test seems to conform with most people's self-typings, so that can be considered success I guess.

I think the previous time I took it (when it didn't have the photo section) I got ILI-Te, and LSE-[?] as the most likely alternative. So at least my results are (relatively) consistent. Nevertheless, I dislike some of the questions and what they're supposed to measure.

[Creepy-Snaps]

I never really like online tests like this. =\

Haven't even tried this one. But understanding your type always *starts* with a test, before you must continue to study and learn to pick what is ultimately best for you.

And considering what others have said, about sliders, invalid dichotomies, etc., test must be fail.

And it includes VI? Ok, so it's fun, but... we all know VI is inconsistent in itself. That just makes the test more inconsistent (BUT FUN OF COURSE!)

And I wouldn't say the test is overall consistent with people's self-typings. Some truth, but a lot of people got results which aren't accurate for their type. Nowhere near consistent.

Hate to be a party-pooper, but I doubt I'm even going to bother taking this test.

[twitch]

Sociotype: IEI-1Ni
aka INFp, The Romantic, , and Intuitive Ethical Introvert
Other Possible Types

1. EII (INFj): 91% as likely as IEI
2. IEE (ENFp): 89% as likely as IEI
3. ILI (INTp): 70% as likely as IEI

Did the test for a second time and came out as INFp... hmm

[twitch]

Ok, so it's fun, but... we all know VI is inconsistent in itself. That just makes the test more inconsistent (BUT FUN OF COURSE!)
Hate to be a party-pooper, but I doubt I'm even going to bother taking this test.

I did it cause it was fun and cause i was curious as to what i would come out as. Im an INFp now (which is what i think i am)
I dare you to take this test!

[The Exception]

Anyone else find it weird that this test consistently gives the 4 highest results as all being in the same club (NF, ST, etc)?

Mine were almost all the same club.

First time taking it LII came on top followed closely by ILI, then LIE, and EII in fourth.

Second time in order of highest to lowest: ILI, LIE, LII, EII

So 3 NT types and one NF.

I wished I had copied down the percentages. I think they ranged from 95% down to approx. 70%

[redbaron]

Mine were almost all the same club.

same for me. Actually I think all four of mine were NF.

[Park]

Haha, I don't think I saw half of those people when I took the test. Does it always give the same photos?

[The Exception]

Haha, I don't think I saw half of those people when I took the test. Does it always give the same photos?

The test randomly selects pairs of photos from a database. So you could retake the test and see some different ones.

[The Exception]

Impossible!

Woman cannot diss the Ronaldo!

I'm an LII. I'm not a real woman.

[Beautiful sky]

That guy VI's as LII

[twitch]

This guy also stood out as a person that I might be somewhat compatible with. Maybe he just has a nice face that most like though?

He looks like a nice guy I think i chose him in the test as well!

[Exodus]

Sometime I'd like to get around to posting examples of pictures from that test that I felt I'd be compatible with, along with those that I felt a distinct incompatible vibe. It would be interesting if several of us did that, maybe we'd start to see some patterns.

People who gave an intelligent and thoughtful vibe got my vote. So did people who appeared emotionally expressive and upbeat. But there's limits. Anyone who appeared too off the wall emotionally dramatic lost my vote.

A couple of the pictures looked depressed and nihilistic as hell or even hostile about things. They did not get my seal of approval.

A couple looked borderline slutty. Again, a no-go.

People who looked arrogant- another major turn off.

Whoa! We must be the same type!

I like the idea of a VI section. You can usually tell whether you'll get along with someone by looking at their pictures.

I got LII-0 (no subtype?) with ILE as a very close second (94% I think).

[RSV3]

Okay, new results display both the aggregate result and the vi component result by itself. Fair warning, the vi component needs a lot of work, so don't expect too much from the results. Here's an example (my most recent result): http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=676.

[Marie84]

RSV3, what do the numbers before the subtype mean?



Sociotype: EII-3Fi
aka INFj, The Empath, , and Ethical Intuitive Introvert
Other Possible Types

1. ESI (ISFj): 87% as likely as EII
2. IEI (INFp): 85% as likely as EII
3. IEE (ENFp): 77% as likely as EII

[Galen]

RSV3, what do the numbers before the subtype mean?

They're meant to represent the strength of your subtype, with 3 being the most extreme and 0 being in the middle between subtypes.

[Marie84]

They're meant to represent the strength of your subtype, with 3 being the most extreme and 0 being in the middle between subtypes.

I thought it might. Thanks

[Absurd]

How is it going there in Beta, Galen and Ashton ? You've got mountains there ?

EDIT:

That guy VI's as LII

You V.I like a monkey.

[Aiss]

Haha. According to VI results, ILI is my second favorite type... but Gamma is my least favorite quadra.

Oh and the other results (don't remember what I did differently this time?):

ILI-1Ni

1. LIE (ENTj): 74% as likely as ILI
2. ILE (ENTp): 72% as likely as ILI
3. LII (INTj): 70% as likely as ILI

VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)

Quadra Distribution
1. Delta: 28%
2. Alpha: 27%
3. Beta: 24%
4. Gamma: 22%

Top 4 Types
1. IEI
2. ILI
3. ILE
4. IEE

Edit: just noticed I picked four Np types by VI. Maybe there's something to it. Hm.

[Pa3s]

Here are examples of people I thought they could be compatible/incompatible with me. They are in no particular order:

 

--------------

I'm not sure if she is compatible, but she still is quite attractive.

 

I also tend to agree with most pictures of warrior-librarian's list.

[munenori2]

SLI (ISTp): 73% as likely as SEI
IEI (INFp): 72% as likely as SEI
ESI (ISFj): 60% as likely as SEI

VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)

Quadra Distribution

Gamma: 31%
Delta: 26%
Beta: 23%
Alpha: 20%

I do wish you could skip some of the VI pics and only select the ones you felt strongly about. Some of 'em I picked just because their photo wasn't as grainy.

[mfckr]

.

[Wynch]

ILE-0

1. LII (INTj): 81% as likely as ILE
2. SLE (ESTp): 56% as likely as ILE
3. LIE (ENTj): 55% as likely as ILE

I also had trouble with the VI. I definitely tended to pick people who seemed softer/gentler around the eyes, but there were a few times where my gut reaction was nota.

[Pa3s]

Hm, it's also difficult to compare our choices because we don't all see the same set of pictures.

[EyeSeeCold]

I took it again, because I overlooked the percentages.

ILI-0 changed to ILI-1Te
LIE is still the second type

My ideal dual would be ESFp-Fi or ISFj-Se

Quadra Distribution:

Delta: 29%
Gamma: 28%
Alpha: 24%
Beta: 19%

Top 4 Types:

SLE
ILE
LSE
SEE

http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=710

[The Exception]

Results on the updated version:

ILI-1Ni

Other Possible Types:

1. LIE 98% as likely
2. LII 94%
3. EII 76%

VI Component Results

Delta 29%
Gamma 29%
Beta 22%
Alpha 21% (what? alphas last???)

Top 4 types:

1. ESI
2. EII
3. SEI
4. IEI

Interesting- all four introverted ethical types on the top. Maybe they just looked the friendlist and least threatening to me.

Ni: 40%
Te 35%
Si 10%
Fe 15%

Se 10%
Fi 15%
Ne 40%
Ti 35%

[ashlesha]

took the test again because i was curious what would come out of the VI component. i was kind of lazy about answering the first set of questions because i was in a hurry to get to the VI part. so the result probably isn't as accurate as it was before.


Sociotype: EII-0
aka INFj, The Empath, , and Ethical Intuitive Introvert
Other Possible Types
1.IEE (ENFp): 75% as likely as EII
2.LII (INTj): 62% as likely as EII
3.ESI (ISFj): 59% as likely as EII

__________________________________
VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
1.Alpha: 31%
2.Beta: 28%
3.Delta: 25%
4.Gamma: 16%

Top 4 Types
1.ILE
2.LII
3.SLE
4.ILI
__________________________________


well...that's interesting.

[1981slater]

I declare the following as compatible with me, for the sake of testing

[Aiss]

Seems I moved on to preferring STs this afternoon.

Sociotype: ILI-0
aka INTp, The Critic, , and Intuitive Logical Introvert
Other Possible Types

LII (INTj): 78% as likely as ILI
LIE (ENTj): 77% as likely as ILI
ILE (ENTp): 74% as likely as ILI

VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution

Beta: 29%
Alpha: 27%
Delta: 22%
Gamma: 22%

Top 4 Types

SLE
LSE
SLI
LSI

[1981slater]

ILI 2 Ni

87% ILE

[squark]

new results:

Sociotype: LSI-0
aka ISTj, The Inspector, , and Logical Sensing Introvert

Other Possible Types
SLE (ESTp): 96% as likely as LSI
SLI (ISTp): 65% as likely as LSI
SEE (ESFp): 63% as likely as LSI

VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)
Quadra Distribution
Beta: 28%
Alpha: 26%
Delta: 23%
Gamma: 23%

Top 4 Types
SLE
SEE
ESI
SEI

. . . I guess I like sensors? hmm.

[Nexus]

Okay, new results display both the aggregate result and the vi component result by itself. Fair warning, the vi component needs a lot of work, so don't expect too much from the results. Here's an example (my most recent result): http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=676.

lol, I got more deltas too, maybe you need to add some hotter alphas

http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=695

[Absurd]

Took the test again and it told me I'm still LSE. That means I'm smart.

L=sm
S=ar
E=t.

EDIT: Oh yea, I forgot about the more conclusive result:

Sociotype: LSE-1Si
aka ESTj, The Director, , and Logical Sensing Extrovert

Other Possible Types
SLI (ISTp): 82% as likely as LSE
LIE (ENTj): 62% as likely as LSE
SLE (ESTp): 60% as likely as LSE

VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)

Quadra Distribution
Gamma: 29%
Delta: 28%
Beta: 23%
Alpha: 21%
Top 4 Types

LIE
EII
EIE
IEE

[Galen]

Wait, where did it give VI results? I never saw that part, maybe I should take it again.

[Absurd]

= Art?

Har de har. Try your luck elsewhere

Wait, where did it give VI results? I never saw that part, maybe I should take it again.

Don't do it, for the love of god, don't do it.

[Galen]

lol what the shit
Sociotype: EII-1Fi

aka INFj, The Empath, , and Ethical Intuitive Introvert

Other Possible Types

IEE (ENFp): 96% as likely as EII
IEI (INFp): 79% as likely as EII
ESI (ISFj): 72% as likely as EII


VI Component Results (worth 30% of test)

Quadra Distribution

Gamma: 27%
Beta: 27%
Alpha: 24%
Delta: 22%
Top 4 Types

EII
LII
ESI
IEI

http://www.sociotype.com/tests/index.php?est_id=736



yes plz:


lol no: