Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: Ti vs Te, have I got this?

  1. #1
    Creepy-male

    Default Ti vs Te, have I got this?

    IF I have this...

    https://docs.google.com/drawings/edi...thkey=CLD-68MO

    ^Above is Ti. All the relationships are described in a static image, ahead of time, in a static form.

    A flowchart is Te (described in static form). It describes what one does with the information at various points when a decision needs to be made about what's been evaluated.
    Last edited by male; 02-01-2011 at 05:50 PM.

  2. #2
    you can go to where your heart is Galen's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2009
    Posts
    8,459
    Mentioned
    206 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You need permission to access this item.

    You are signed in as (xxxxxxxx)@gmail.com, but you don't have permission to access this item. You can request access from the owner or sign-in as a different user. Learn more

    Request access Sign in as a different user



    That isn't a bad little blurb about Te though.

  3. #3
    Feeling fucking fantastic golden's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Second story
    TIM
    EIE
    Posts
    3,724
    Mentioned
    250 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    LSI: “I still can’t figure out Pinterest.”

    Me: “It’s just, like, idea boards.”

    LSI: “I don’t have ideas.”

  4. #4
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,953
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Yes, the flowchart is Te. Haven't I said this before about what turns me on about Te type of thinking and the methodical progression they use to execute a task?
    Last edited by Beautiful sky; 02-02-2011 at 04:31 AM.
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •