VI a really cool person!
Okay, sorry to be obsessive. Remember, I'm using these VI threads to get oriented to VI and narrow things down to consider a person in terms of possible functions/roles for them. I have two possible typings in mind for her but could be way off.
This woman is one of my favorite people in the world. Be nice!I'm fond of saying that if only she were a man ...
Please don't quote pix.
[pix removed]
Last edited by golden; 10-01-2010 at 12:02 AM.
Alpha NT? It's more of an impression of mine though.
Alpha SF? It's more of an impression of mine though.
MaliaFee? It's more of an impression of mine though.
No. Different person.Originally Posted by CILi
She's a perceptual type
XXFp so either INFp or ESFp
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Of those two, I'll go with ESFp. She's socially outgoing to the Nth degree and knows hundreds and hundreds of people. She didn't just wait for them to walk up to her.
Yes, I would agree with you. In fact, IEI and SEE get along wonderfully as I get along wonderfully with ESE. Feeler types are gentler and much more concerned about not hurting people's emotions then T types, although I must admit that there are scant few mature T types and fewer among LSE who are particularly sensitive and caring.Of those two, I'll go with ESFp. She's socially outgoing to the Nth degree and knows hundreds and hundreds of people. She didn't just wait for them to walk up to her.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
She's E, no question
She's probably S (used to be bulkier, did college sports)
She's probably F
She's very, very, very, very, very, very P
Hard-working, very artistic, pretty good with money and understands it well enough. Doesn't remind me of IEI there. She doesn't remind me of the Alphas I've known. If she's Alpha, it would have to be Alpha SF, not NT.
She's a weird combination of strong and driven and incredibly illogical and scatterbrained.
And she's very good at understanding other people and supporting them in their life situations and toward their goals.
x
Hard to tell...IEE?
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
--> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
No way, she's good with $. scatterbrained, logical, bulky...and the winner is Ti-ENTp!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! !!!!!!!!!!
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Reply With Quote
