Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 41 to 46 of 46

Thread: type this dual pair!

  1. #41
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    Blaze, are ILE goofy?
    yes we are. absolutely.

    i just read the rest of the thread....i guess i was wrong. i just got more of an Ne valuing sense from this pair than an Se valuing sense.

    they seem fun. the woman seems SEI to me and the man ILE. you can't always go by VI though.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  2. #42
    ._. Aiss's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    TIM
    IEI
    Posts
    2,009
    Mentioned
    19 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    You guys are making me feel better.

  3. #43
    Humanist Beautiful sky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    EII land
    TIM
    EII INFj
    Posts
    26,955
    Mentioned
    701 Post(s)
    Tagged
    6 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Blaze View Post
    yes we are. absolutely.

    i just read the rest of the thread....i guess i was wrong. i just got more of an Ne valuing sense from this pair than an Se valuing sense.

    they seem fun. the woman seems SEI to me and the man ILE. you can't always go by VI though.
    What are the stark differences between the pairs, behaviorally?

    SEI-ILE
    SLE-IEI

    ??

    There are already so many similarities; like, humor, business...on
    -
    Dual type (as per tcaudilllg)
    Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?


    I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE

    Best description of functions:
    http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html

  4. #44
    Blaze's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2006
    Posts
    5,714
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Maritsa33 View Post
    What are the stark differences between the pairs, behaviorally?

    SEI-ILE
    SLE-IEI

    ??

    There are already so many similarities; like, humor, business...on
    that's just it, the differences are not all that stark, but more subtle.

    SEI and SLE can come across in a similar way...but SEI is going to be more emotionally expressive i would guess. SLE is more needs/motives focused. i guess Se + Ti (apprehension of people's capabilities & needs, hidden logic) and Si + Fe (hidden apprehension of people's internal comfort, outward emotions and mood) could superficially seem similar when presenting side by side.

    ILE and IEI i can comment on more from practical experience. both types are kind of spaced out. with IEI the Ni + Fe produces an open congenial facial expression. the valuing of Ti interacts with the Ni to produce some detachment. with ILE the Ne produces a similar facial expression though not as emotionally nuanced. the Ti is more hidden at first....but the valuing of Fe plus the Ne leading produces an open expression.

    at least from what i have seen. infpman and i have to work hard to notice things in the environment sometimes. i would say i'm a little better at it than he is....he is better at noticing what's going on socially.

    you can mistake your lookalike for your dual. and you can seem similar to your illusionary in some ways.

    ILE

    those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often

  5. #45
    Trevor's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Posts
    2,840
    Mentioned
    10 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Default

    How about SEE guy, ILI gal. ftr, i haven't seen your responses yet.

    EDIT:
    Answer: man is INFp-Ni
    woman is ESTp-Se
    There you go.

  6. #46
    Creepy-cinq

    Default

    I would have guessed this is an Alpha dual pair.

Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12

Tags for this Thread

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •