.
VI me
.
Last edited by Bardia; 05-28-2011 at 05:30 PM.
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
That would be me
ESTj- Airborne is also ESTj 1w9
I would like to direct you to this thread, please read about ESTj/Airborne's contributions and see if any of it alighns with you
Thank you,
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ta-lounge.html
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-14-2010 at 10:27 PM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
are you serious? ? ?Originally Posted by Maritsa33
That would be me
ESTj- Airborne is also ESTj 1w9
I would like to direct you to this thread, please read about ESTj/Airborne's contributions and see if any of it alighns with you
Thank you,
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ta-lounge.html
scratch it, don't care. Bardia, I think you are some IJ type. Fi-IJ type suits you best.
asd
Dear,
Do you have anger and rage?
If yes, you may very well be ESTj.
Why do you think he is an Fi type? What has he said or showed in behavior that would indicate him being Fi, in your opinion?
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 04-15-2010 at 12:16 AM.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Anger and rage can be found in other types. I'm going with ISFj on this guy.
True, but not as a mobilizing function, then it becomes purpose driven rage. I would disagree with ISTj because he does not actively eliminate contridictions to systems like Diane and other ISTj's do in their posts.
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Interesting. So mobilizing functions make purpose-driven rage? Does that mean I can't be angry with a reason without being ESTj?
Purpose driven rage in the case of ESTj is to mobilize INFj's because INFj's are not aware of the dangers of their surroundings and ESTj's are very sharp about this sort of thing. In rage, they act very purposefully and directly, quickly, to "save" a person from danger. You can be angry without being ESTj; but anger, for ESTj, is purposefully to try to get someones attention to something.
Are you thinking you are ESTj?
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
INTj.
Do you have any other reason other than VI to think LSE?That would be me
ESTj- Airborne is also ESTj 1w9
I would like to direct you to this thread, please read about ESTj/Airborne's contributions and see if any of it alighns with you
Thank you,
http://www.the16types.info/vbulletin...ta-lounge.html
“No psychologist should pretend to understand what he does not understand... Only fools and charlatans know everything and understand nothing.” -Anton Chekhov
http://kevan.org/johari?name=Bardia0
http://kevan.org/nohari?name=Bardia0
Fi-ISFj doesn't seem too bad. Granted it's impossible for me to VI gammas, but it makes sense I guess
Fi-ISFj.
Or maybe even ENTj
Dual type
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
Reply With Quote
