Is Se possessiveness? They'll take pain and suffering for the material rewards?
Is Se possessiveness?
Is Se possessiveness? They'll take pain and suffering for the material rewards?
Yes, especially SeFi. They are extraverts, what else can we expect of extraverts? They toil and ignore their health until it becomes unavoidable. SeTi are not possessive...they think everything is transitory.
Last edited by Beautiful sky; 12-30-2010 at 06:22 AM.
-
Dual type(as per tcaudilllg)
Enneagram 5 (wings either 4 or 6)?
I'm constantly looking to align the real with the ideal.I've been more oriented toward being overly idealistic by expecting the real to match the ideal. My thinking side is dominent. The result is that sometimes I can be overly impersonal or self-centered in my approach, not being understanding of others in the process and simply thinking "you should do this" or "everyone should follor this rule"..."regardless of how they feel or where they're coming from"which just isn't a good attitude to have. It is a way, though, to give oneself an artificial sense of self-justification. LSE
Best description of functions:
http://socionicsstudy.blogspot.com/2...functions.html
^^Originally Posted by Ashton2
Se is shitting over someone you claim to love because they're not "good enough" or whatever the bullshit motivation is.
Stupid fuckhead.
</rant>
Is there something you'd like to tell us Gul?
I'd like to, yes, but I won't. Not being defiant or petulant or anything.
The thing I'd like most is tell it to his stupid, shrinking, weak, uncaring, simpering face and get him to man the fuck up. But that's not really an option either.
Haven't you ever heard of tough love?
Haven't you ever heard of treating women with due respect? How about balanced relationships?
^which video game is your avatar from?
Se isn't possessiveness. Possessiveness is one way Se can manifest, but it can just as well manifest in an assumption that everybody can take care of themselves, and as such have no need of the Se-ego to possess them, to control them or whatever--the assumption that you're strong enough to think for yourself, and if you're not, you're not worth bothering with, certainly not for a romantic relationship.
Not a rule, just a trend.
IEI. Probably Fe subtype. Pretty sure I'm E4, sexual instinctual type, fairly confident that I'm a 3 wing now, so: IEI-Fe E4w3 sx/so. Considering 3w4 now, but pretty sure that 4 fits the best.
Yes 'a ma'am that's pretty music...
I am grateful for the mystery of the soul, because without it, there could be no contemplation, except of the mysteries of divinity, which are far more dangerous to get wrong.
Possessiveness is one way any function can 'manifest'. It is a personality trait connected to an individual's learned behavior and does not necessarily exemplify an informational element. I don't see any basis for stereotypically asserting that either.I would like to inform you that the physical act of shitting on top of people is not necessarily related to the use of any one function. If that were true, Se egos would have higher proficiency and skill in defecating on top of people, and this can be proved false.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
