...are just so fucking sexy.
Madonna
Kate Winslet
Angelina Jolie
Megan Fox
Olivia Wilde
Amanda Palmer
...are just so fucking sexy.
Madonna
Kate Winslet
Angelina Jolie
Megan Fox
Olivia Wilde
Amanda Palmer
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
You forgot:
and
"What is love?"
"The total absence of fear," said the Master.
"What is it we fear?"
"Love," said the Master.
I chose Love
I don't think Jolie is an SLE, she seems incredibly introverted
Some other possible female SLE contributions
Blake Lively
Michelle Rodriguez
Sharon Stone
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
Jolie and Wilde are duals.
4w3-5w6-8w7
Mostly Ti subtype SLEs in that first post... Where are the Se girls?
After watching some interviews I'm questioning Olivia Wilde as SLE; I'm considering ILE primarily.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
I see a lot of similarities between Wilde and Jolie in terms of how they act: both sort of fast-paced in their speech, similar reactivity and so forth, but Jolie is more controlled, more direct; Wilde is more haphazard and "out there."
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
VIA VI, Olivia Wilde looks like -in my opinion- these Spanish celebrities, surely SEE
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
ILE "Searcher"
Socionics: ENTp
DCNH: Dominant --> perhaps Normalizing
Enneagram: 7w6 "Enthusiast"
MBTI: ENTJ "Field Marshall" or ENTP "Inventor"
Astrological sign: Aquarius
To learn, read. To know, write. To master, teach.
Mmm...I like ILE for Wilde. Her interaction style reminds me vaguely of my IEE-Fi roommate.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
kate winslet SLE? nah. she's got Fe ego up the ying yang. lol.
angelina jolie no way SLE. SLI imo, she supervises brad pitt, LIE.
blake lively? why?
i agree w most of the others.
ILE
those who are easily shocked.....should be shocked more often
I'm not exactly sure, I have to look closely through her video. But she seems like she's an Introvert. Unlike the Introvert-ness of SLE-Ti which I think always gets mistaken as an Introvert personality. As matter of fact, I have asked a lot of people whether they think certain SLE-Ti we know of is an Introvert or an Extrovert, two terms that most people would know without studying any psychology systems. They always tell me that they are very quiet, not like the stereotype or the extrovertness.
Olivia Wilde is Ti ENTp, yeah.
Amanda Palmer is ENFj imo. Ej temperament and Fe egos give me a vibe thats a mixture between caregiver and victim. Sounds odd maybe, but I get it pretty strong from her. Could just be image triad. However, Winehouse is supposedly ESTp image triad and they don't feel the same. Palmer seems kinda, "on top of her game" emotionally/image portrayal-wise, although she seems emptier and calculating on the inside. Palmer has Proactive emotions, whereas Winehouse is reactive like she's feeling her way around a dark room. That's something I relate to (Emotions are a fundamental part of human communication, so I'm not referencing them just because they're Fe valuers).
The end is nigh
Can someone explain to me how Angelina Jolie is sexy? Yeah I guess if looking like a fake bitch with collagen lips is sexy...
what does amanda palmer have in common w/ any of them?
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
Browse images: Angelina Jolie's Never Before Seen Teenage Photo Shoot! | RadarOnline.com - from when she was 16.
6w5 sx
model Φ: -+0
sloan - rcuei
I've been joking for the last couple of posts.
But seriously though, she doesn't do much for me. That's just my opinion. Her look has very rugged, aggressive overtones. Her facial features seem out of proportion. That could be natural, and I can accept that, but the effect is also probably heavily compounded by makeup and lighting. I find this insistence on maximizing or highlighting certain features (like her enormous mouth) to be somewhat fetishistic, and that's a major turn off.
I'm much more attracted to women who maintain a softer appearance, and who can subtly highlight the natural beauty and harmony in their faces. That seems much more authentic to me.
I would rate Jolie 5/10 in terms of looks, which is acceptable. Maybe 4.
ps. I'm probably an infantile, and to each his own.
Last edited by xerx; 11-01-2009 at 08:58 PM.
I think a plausible hypothesis regarding this, if there's even a correlation to type... from most aggressive to least aggressive features: Beta ST > Delta ST ~ Gamma SF > Alpha SF.
Gamma SFs and Delta STs seem to swing both ways about equally, from the ones I've seen typed.
Which implies: Se > Si and Ti > Te ego. And Fi > Fe ego.
Madonna? Blech. Looking at her is painful. She's more manlier than your average man. Hard and old and ugly.
yeah our sle women databank needs to expand...as I myself have said before madonna is old and busted, megan fox is the new hotness. It's like cars man. Jolie yuck
I'm really not sure, maybe a Gamma introvert. She makes a lot of harsh Fi+Se valuing remarks like
[on Megan Fox] "Is she aiding in Africa or sitting in on U.N. conferences? Donating herself to something bigger than Hollywood? I'm not familiar with her work, is she an Oscar contender?"
I know some people have typed her as SLI, but I don't know, she's a comes across as a little too harsh for that, but it's not an impossible typing.
Just a guess. ILE was another option
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
I really don't know how anyone sees Jolie as SLI. That is kind of just...beyond me.
But, for a certainty, back then,
We loved so many, yet hated so much,
We hurt others and were hurt ourselves...
Yet even then, we ran like the wind,
Whilst our laughter echoed,
Under cerulean skies...
Maybe it's the quiet, laid-back, tomboy persona which seems to be associated with female SLI's.
While a lot of SLI women tend to dress rather boyishly I think they do so more out of a need for comfort or for practical reasons. Jolie, on the other hand, seems to care too much about the image she's trying to project, whereas I doubt an SLI would give two-licks something like that, nor do I think they'd enjoy the attention that goes with it
EII INFj
Forum status: retired
OMG same. Jeeez... I think it's mainly cause they can't separate her actual personality in interviews from the roles she plays in movies ... a lot of the times they are very stoic, 'bad-ass' types ala Lara Croft or the chick from Wanted she played.
She is soo clearly valuing.
She reminds me of a female version of Steve Buscemi
EIE tritype 5w4, 4w5, 9w1
As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.
Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections", 1962
well if you look at them, they both have those big glossy eyes, and they seem to have the same mannerisms, just watch an interview of both.
EIE tritype 5w4, 4w5, 9w1
As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.
Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections", 1962
She's such a different person now. Who she was in that interview seems nothing at all like how she'd act now. It almost seems like an act. Like she's purpously trying to seem edgy and tough. You can't type her because she changes so much.
EIE tritype 5w4, 4w5, 9w1
As far as we can discern, the sole purpose of human existence is to kindle a light in the darkness of mere being.
Carl Jung, "Memories, Dreams, Reflections", 1962