Not SEE after all

[energystar]

...

[crazedrat]

you may still be SEE. SEE-Fi, and have a shallow understanding of SEE which is leading you to believe there are depths to your personality which SEE doesn't cover. Gamma is pretty clear to me though, so the other best option is indeed ESI. But for ESI, you don't seem as judgmental in your writing. Really, you are pondering many options outloud and dynamically weighing them against one another. That is much more characteristic of SEE and not ESI.

[energystar]

...

[Azeroffs]

I would definitely say ESI over SEE or LIE.

The way you describe yourself is definitely not how an LIE would. ESI are not going to sound judgemental all the time. I could see ESI confusing themselves as an intuitive because of the more conscious draw toward the abstract unknown (Ni-HA) as compared to a dominant Se type. You also seem very structured as a person, responsible, and driven which is characteristic of gamma rationals. Your attitude toward expression of emotion comes off as typical of Fe-ignoring types as well.

ESI