OK. Just didn't understand your idea. I thought you meant ignoring-fuction-subtype = disinterested, demonstrative-function-subtype = childish and so on. So your idea might be true.
For LSI and SLI it should olso be obvious that different DCNH-types are described.
Ti-LSI:
Very polite and attentive to details in conversation, likes that all specify and explain their opinions, but sometimes is prone to get stuck up on nonessential details.
Te-LSI:
Outwardly is strict, sustained, somewhat single-minded. In working situations is official, and even with close relatives can manifest a barrack style of behaviour.
Ti-SLI:
The logical subtype prefers to maintain a distance. When they become aware of having had offended someone they show regret, soften themselves and apologize calmly.
Te-SLI:
Will always avoid useless matters, due to pragmatic nature. Very dynamic and technologically effective, Can extract the maximum of benefit even from tools.
My typing ability is certainly not bad. I just don't like typing celebrities so you might be better at that.
What do you think about Clinton? Some say SEE, others say IEE, others say ESE.
G.W.Bush? Some say LSE, other say LSI, others say EIE.
In my opinion it's completely useless to discuss about the types of celebrities. Gulenko might be of a different opinion than Ovcharov, DeLong of a different opinion than Ganin and so on. Useless.
If you understand the theories then you are able to type the persons you know personally. It will never be possible to type persons you don't know. Just my opinion.
OK. I say LII, you say IEI, other say EIE. Whatever.
No. You don't know me so it is possible from your point of view but I am a student of mathematics. I don't think there is any student of mathematics in the world who is IEI. is not my weakness but my strength.
Depends on the main type. H-SEIs certainly behave like you say. But H-LIIs are somesthing completely different.
Certainly. Everything is more complicated than it is described in Scionics. I just try to emphasize the main points.