What do you think of this socionics test?

[The Exception]

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!
Test results
LII Your result
EII These types might also be considered
ILI
LIE
IEI These types are not very likely
EIE
ILE
IEE
LSI These types are quite unlikely
ESI
SLI
LSE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
ESE
SLE
SEE

I thought the results were quite accurate. Interesting how my top 8 types are all intuitive.

[ragnar]

Mizami: Registreer jezelf nu!
Test results

Your result

ILI

These types might also be considered

SLI
ILE
SLE

These types are not very likely

LII
IEI
LSI
SEI

These types are quite unlikely

LIE
IEE
LSE
SEE

these types are extremely unlikely

EII
ESI
EIE
ESE

Some of the questions were quite ambiguous, difficult to give a good answer to.

[Cone]

Holy fuck! You guys change Socionics or something? I'm embarrassed to even post this! You people might think I lied on the test or something... *embarrassed emoticon since apparently it's gone now*

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

Well, I still get ILI as a highly-considerable type. One thing's for sure, though: I've changed a lot. I used to be severely repressed back in high school, and even throughout most of college, I wouldn't say I was exactly socially anxious, just socially maligned, if that makes any sense. I'm not really shy anymore, at least not in the traditional way, and most of my shyness comes from complex factors that are unrelated to "general" social anxiety or AvPD. Nowadays, I stab people in the face who try to tell me I'm "shy" or "unemotional", and I feel like I'm in a stage now where I feel threatened at every turn as I attempt to assert who I really feel I am. I don't think I really should have taken that test, as I'm not exactly in a healthy state right now, although I did give those questions answers I would give if I was in a healthy state (and right now I don't feel too bad!)

As is indicated by my test results, I'm about as P as they come. That I can agree with 100%. E is indicated over I, and F/T and S/N are ambiguous. I think I still understand J/P and E/I differences, possibly even S/N differences, but F/T differences is something I never really got ahold of. I know that you guys think about Socionics differently nowadays than how we did in the distant past, and I'd be glad to go back into type analysis by anyone that's willing. But I know you guys will probably want to keep me INTp.

As for the test, some questions I just couldn't answer, because Rick uses concepts that I've never thought of before. Of course, that's why I really don't like any tests, and it always takes me fifty years to get through any of them. For example, he asked a question that said something like, "you feel that you control the emotional atmosphere around people or in relationships OR the emotional atmosphere is something you don't control" and for one, I've never thought about this before, and two, I don't feel either of these ways. I feel that I match the emotional atmosphere, whatever it may be, and the cause or effect of the situation is something I don't know. Another one: "You try to plan a strategy and get a feel for the general outline of things OR you are very adept at solving problems when they come." I haven't a clue. You know what I mean?

Anyway, enough verbosity for now. Have fun, everyone!

Coney

[Creepy-Pied Piper]

Removed at User Request

[Jarno]

I know that you guys think about Socionics differently nowadays than how we did in the distant past

What has been changed from your point of view? I'm curious.

Personally I find things to be getting to abstract and unnecessary complex, instead of simplicity and being practical.

[Warlord]

Holy fuck! You guys change Socionics or something? I'm embarrassed to even post this! You people might think I lied on the test or something... *embarrassed emoticon since apparently it's gone now*

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

There's a bug in the test, it gives that result if you do the test too slowly.

[717495]

There's a bug in the test, it gives that result if you do the test too slowly.

Lol. Slow...

ILIs, YOU HAVE FOUND YOUR DUAL AND IT IS I.

Never. I think you're an ILI.

[Cone]

Actually, I did the test in the suggested time of between 20 and 30 minutes, twice, and for one run, I just answered the questions as fast and as randomly as possible, and I still got the same exact result each time. Apparently the bug is in how contradictory your answers are, at least in regards to Socionics, and well, I'm both slow and apparently contradictory when I take these tests. It's not really that I think I "over-interpret" the questions (or maybe it is), it's that when I go to answer half of these questions, I'm always stuck thinking either "I don't understand" or "I've never thought of myself in that way before". I couldn't get an overarching view of myself even if my life depended on it. I define myself by the way I act at any given moment, I guess, and when I go to give answers to these tests, I always go back into my memory and try to find examples of behaviors I've exhibited that may match. I guess it's not about how I feel but rather how I act. (I have to ask, is there a type that does that?)

[munenori2]

Basically the same as last time, just shuffled around a bit.

[Cone]

Jarno: People were commenting on my old INTp/INTj post about how it's changed, so I just figured it did. Personally I've forgotten half the stuff about Socionics.

Lol... You are just too irrational for the test... (if you don't do all of the test at once, no breaks, you'll automatically end up with the SEE-SLE-IEE-etc. result.) :tongue:

Ok, so I just went through it again and answered all the questions as randomly and as fast as possible. I get the same exact result. Although the first time I think I screwed up the last part of the test (with the "better"/"much better" stuff), as I didn't understand what was going on. I figured it out now, but still...THIS TEST IS BROKEN! Or at least I fail at it, badly.

EDIT: Ok, so I went through the test again for real. Same damn thing. I give up. One thing's apparently for sure: I think about myself practically all the time, yet I don't know myself at all.

[Wynch]

Same old song and dance:

ILE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
SEE These types are not very likely
SLI
LIE
IEI
LSE These types are quite unlikely
SEI
EIE
LII
ESE these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
ESI

[Creepy-Diana]

.

[Kim]

Your result: IEE
These types might also be considered: ILE, SEE, IEI
These types are not very likely EIE, SLE, ILI, SEI
These types are quite unlikely: LIE, ESE, EII, SLI
these types are extremely unlikely LSE, LII, ESI, LSI

[greed]

SEE Your result
SLE These types might also be considered
IEE
ILI
IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
SLI
ILE
ESI These types are quite unlikely
LSE
EIE
ESE
LII these types are extremely unlikely
LSI
EII
LIE

ahahahaha

[ashlesha]

EII Your result

ESI These types might also be considered
EIE
ESE

IEI These types are not very likely
SEI
LII
IEE

LSI These types are quite unlikely
SEE
LIE
LSE

ILI these types are extremely unlikely
SLI
ILE
SLE

[Words]

SLI Your result

SLE These types might also be considered
LSI
LSE

SEI These types are not very likely
ILI
SEE
ESI

ILE These types are quite unlikely
LII
ESE
LIE

IEI these types are extremely unlikely
IEE
EII
EIE

I wonder if it's somewhat dichotomy focused, as SLI and SLE are pretty far apart.

[Bardia]

ESI Your result
ESE These types might also be considered
EII
LSI
EIE These types are not very likely
LSE
LII
SEI
LIE These types are quite unlikely
SEE
IEI
SLI
IEE these types are extremely unlikely
SLE
ILI
ILE

[Creepy-male]

What's wrong with EP temperament for you?

[Absurd]

LSE Your result
LSI These types might also be considered
SLE
LIE
SLI These types are not very likely
ESE
LII
ESI
ILE These types are quite unlikely
SEE
ILI
EIE
SEI these types are extremely unlikely
EII
IEE
IEI

EDIT: Damn, I wanted to be EII, so I could touch myself.

[Simon Ssmall]

Test results
IEE Your result
EIE These types might also be considered
SEE
IEI
ESE These types are not very likely
EII
ILE
SEI
LIE These types are quite unlikely
ESI
SLE
ILI
LSE these types are extremely unlikely
LII
SLI
LSI