Easy way to memorize the + and - elements

[717495]

Remember that the first element of the function block will be opposite of the second element. Ex ILEs first block is + -.

However for memorization purposes, just focus on the first element of each function block, the main and dominant elements as you normally know them 1-8.

J elements ()
N types have +F -T elements
S types have -F +T elements

P elements ()
Alphas and Gammas have +N +S elements
Betas and Deltas have -N -S elements

I'm not really sure how accurate the functional revise is, but I noticed this pattern, so I wanted to share it with anyone who cares.

[717495]

Also, if anyone would like to discuss this idea shown here, I'd like to hear what you have to say about it.

[xerx]

Also, if anyone would like to discuss this idea shown here, I'd like to hear what you have to say about it.

Most of that work is based on erroneous empirical correlations.

[717495]

Most of that work is based on erroneous empirical correlations.

I just often see people use it and wonder as to why.

[xerx]

I just often see people use it and wonder as to why.

They're actually using this. The one you quoted is a hypothesis by a user on the forum, which comes to lots of very odd conclusions about functions, types and quadras based on the guy's personal observations. IMO he does have some interesting things to say if you're willing to sift through it.

[717495]

They're actually using this. The one you quoted is a hypothesis by a user on the forum, which comes to lots of very odd conclusions about functions, types and quadras based on the guy's personal observations. IMO he does have some interesting things to say if you're willing to sift through it.

But the Model A is the same idea as this one, where the definitions are from a collection of new and old ideas, right?

Can it be used with typing people? For instance, if it seems like this girl I know has both and and I can't seem to figure out which one is her primary, given she's an SFJ, I can say she seems more + and - and so that would give the implication of an ISFj. Is this close to plausable?