ENXp

[EllaC]

Bonjour,
Long time no see... sort of forgot about Socionics. But then, things have come up, and I'm wondering whether that means I am my type, I'm not my type! Any help would be appreciated :-D

I'm not brilliant with the technical side to all this, nor am I particularly concerned. So, I assume it's T v. F... could be wrong, but I assume I'm a 'T' because I'm secretive with my feelings, hide love life etc. and I'm very strategic, I see everything very political. But I notice my decision making is done on morality, and also with huge questioning to peoples situation, how it will effect them, and I am wracked by guilt to think they may be negatively effected by my decision. I'm pretty spiritual, so I guess some of that comes from thinking like this... but still. I'm stupidly loyal, and would rather get hurt first, then hurt. But yet, I am so strategic, and over think a situation before it happens. So what do we think?

I'm interested in what this means!
Ella xxx

[Kristiina]

Bonjour,
Long time no see... sort of forgot about Socionics. But then, things have come up, and I'm wondering whether that means I am my type, I'm not my type! Any help would be appreciated :-D

I'm not brilliant with the technical side to all this, nor am I particularly concerned. So, I assume it's T v. F... could be wrong, but I assume I'm a 'T' because I'm secretive with my feelings, hide love life etc. and I'm very strategic, I see everything very political. But I notice my decision making is done on morality, and also with huge questioning to peoples situation, how it will effect them, and I am wracked by guilt to think they may be negatively effected by my decision. I'm pretty spiritual, so I guess some of that comes from thinking like this... but still. I'm stupidly loyal, and would rather get hurt first, then hurt. But yet, I am so strategic, and over think a situation before it happens. So what do we think?

I'm interested in what this means!
Ella xxx

your post was about as difficult to read as that of ISFps. Very scattered. I tried to read one sentence like 3 times and still though, "wtf?". Is it just me?

[duality is cringe]

Is it just me?

No.

[consentingadult]

your post was about as difficult to read as that of ISFps. Very scattered. I tried to read one sentence like 3 times and still though, "wtf?". Is it just me?

No, it's a style similar to Tereg's, of whom I've said in the past that his usage of Ne is more likely suggestive then leading. Simply admiring Ne doesn't make one a leading Ne type.

[tereg]

No, it's a style similar to Tereg's, of whom I've said in the past that his usage of Ne is more likely suggestive then leading. Simply admiring Ne doesn't make one a leading Ne type.

I'd like to have a discussion with you (more in depth than the last time we discussed this) some time.

[consentingadult]

I'd like to have a discussion with you (more in depth than the last time we discussed this) some time.

I'm not against a discussion, but what would be the nature of such a discussion? Or to put it differently, what is it you would want to accomplish with it?

[tereg]

I'm not against a discussion, but what would be the nature of such a discussion? Or to put it differently, what is it you would want to accomplish with it?

Well, I guess when matters like this come up I find myself questioning what it is that I know. So, it is to find out if what I believe or interpret is true is actually correct or if I need to rethink what it is I'm learning or believe.

[EllaC]

your post was about as difficult to read as that of ISFps. Very scattered. I tried to read one sentence like 3 times and still though, "wtf?". Is it just me?

Haha, I was writing as I would speak. I can write properly... I hope!