Type this Thought Process - Ti/Ne or Te/Ni?

[diljs]

Please type this thought process as either Ti/Ne, Te/Ni, or neither, and explain why.

I wanted to rip a dvd with Handbrake, and it had been a while since I used it. I looked at the different encoding options available in the program, and wasn't sure if I remembered what settings I liked. Because of this, I pulled up a few browser tabs and did some googling. I first searched to see if anyone had listed the settings they had used for the specific DVD I was ripping, but didn't find any. I briefly looked into the settings for iPhone video, as I am considering purchasing one and thought compatibility would be a good idea to avoid re-ripping, but abandoned the idea because the format used for iPhone video isn't my favorite, and I could always convert the rip. I read the online manual for several minutes, and learned all about the deinterlacing, audio, and picture options, as well as some interesting details about how dvds work with frame rates, etc.

I then returned to the program and customized the recommended settings to meet what I wanted. I chose optimal quality over speed or small filesize, even though I wanted to watch the movie as soon as it was finished. I spent quite a bit of time testing the different deinterlacing options and comparing the sample picture with the original. I felt a need to retain as much detail as reasonably possible, and emphasized this in my selections. Keep in mind that this is something I'm going to watch today, throw on a hard drive and possibly never watch again.

Eventually I decided my settings were "good enough", and let the program begin encoding. I went to find a snack while I waited."

[strrrng]

Alpha NT without a doubt lol, could smell that shit a mile away. Probably Ti-ENTp - the TiSi emphasis seems to be there.

[Park]

Please type this thought process as either Ti/Ne, Te/Ni, or neither, and explain why.

That pretty much reminds me of myself perfectly. I think we have a logical type, and aside from that I can't tell. I would mostly consider Delta ST and Alpha NT, and perhaps ILI. The amount of focus on Si makes me doubt LIE.

[Ritella]

why is Ti/Se or Te/Si not an option.

I would say it's Te/Si because it sounds completely foreign to me, though I sort of like the result. The concern for quality sounds sort of Si and the procedure sounds more Te, i think.

[Park]

why is Ti/Se or Te/Si not an option.

They are both included in the 3rd option.

[Ritella]

They are both included in the 3rd option.

Sure, but why not give them each an option?
It's like the OP is saying either is unlikely, or that differentiating between them doesn't matter.

[Park]

Sure, but why not give them each an option?

Now that's another question.

It's like the OP is saying either is unlikely, or that differentiating between them doesn't matter.

Yeah, it seems that way. He probably thinks that Ti/Ne and Ni/Te are much more likely than anything else.

[strrrng]

I actually could see some delta ST. The thought process was very methodical, and I could have been mistaking the details of it for simply Si, when it was more Te. Not sure. It did have a sequential quality to it, which tends to be how Te people think (as opposed to the centralized, structural way Ti people think). Either way, I don't think beta ST or gamma NT; no Ni/Se. Even a gamma NT describing a Te process wouldn't be that methodical, and would probably be a little less explicit in illustrating it.

[Park]

I think the person in question clearly has both strong Te & strong Ti, the preferred (conscious) one being very hard to recognize from this writing. Furthermore, his inquisitiveness and attention to detail alongside with his open-mindness and thoroughness are good indicators of Ne/Si values, there is no sign of Se and the only way Ni is (/could be) present is again through Ne.


So LII, LSE, SLI or ILE. With some more info we might be able to pin it down.

Even a gamma NT describing a Te process wouldn't be that methodical, and would probably be a little less explicit in illustrating it.

That's probably true.

[Gilly]

The problem is that this isn't a thought process at all; it's just describing what he did. The function being used to write here is Te; however I think its far too superficial an example to base a typing on.

[aestrivex]

The problem is that this isn't a thought process at all; it's just describing what he did. The function being used to write here is Te; however I think its far too superficial an example to base a typing on.

for (i=0; i<1) {gilly.points += ++i;}