I've realised are pretty much dominated by LIIs.
The threads' authors in this subforum
I've realised are pretty much dominated by LIIs.
Who else comes up with theories? Also, what Fe is to be gained from challenging an existing system which has consensus? That right there rules out ILE participation.
some theories are much better than others on here
assuming that tcaud and machintruc are LIIs, which i don't think either of them are.Originally Posted by Ezra
The idiot has spoken again. If you can't see that tcaudilllg is an LII, well then there's no hope for you.
Ah cut the sarcasm. I've been wondering, do you favor unproven strategies for progress, or not favor them?
You seriously think ILEs only challenge theories because of the Fe they get out of it?
What do you think they are? I've actually been doubting machintruc's being an LII recently.
Ahahahaha
So what the fuck ? Being LSI is cool ! Fuck you !
So what the fuck ? Being LSI is cool ! Fuck you !
Oh yeah! The only reason I ever do critical thinking of my own is to win the approval of others. The rest of the time I smile and nod and use my talents to reinforce the masses. My ultimate goal in life is to follow the consensus and thereby win the popularity contest of life. That's why anytime someone challenges my way of thinking I back down entirely and fret in a corner, hoping they don't think less of me now that we've disagreed. In fact, sometimes I even grovel at their feet, hoping they may impart on me some mercy and forget about what it is that I've said. I'm horribly afraid of debate, you guys. Everytime there's a debate a get a sick feeling in my tummy because I'm afraid the outcome may result unfavourably in people's feelings towards me.
ILE
7w8 so/sp
Very busy with work. Only kind of around.
tcaud is one of the best examples of an exemplary LII on this forum. i don't know where in gods green earth you could get EIE from, but this just proves what Phaedrus and I have been saying for a while now
I agree with these typings.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
THIS:
is something that still doesn't sit well with me, though, as so far we have not had any reason to believe that conflict between types would exist "crossed" between master and slave type. Tcaudilllg has a clear repeating tendency to get in conflict with Si dominants, and this can not be explained by the fact that he is INTj.
(the only person of those four who is not ISxP with extreme likelyhood would be Dee, the others have typed themselves as such and have never been suspected to be anything else)
Count me in.
“Whether we fall by ambition, blood, or lust, like diamonds we are cut with our own dust.”
Or because you developed your theory around your relationship with her, which just happens to be good.
Not so, because I developed the "good relationship" aspect of the theory long before we met. We've got a good relationship because she's a liberal, and therefore I instinctively care for her.
these look good, yes.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote