Clubs on Wikisocion

[Expat]

club descriptions are part of classical socionics, but i'm at a loss for why people from similar clubs are likely to act similarly in any kind of significant way.

Assuming that the ego and id functions are strong, you may well be inclined to give preference to activities/interests related to those functions. However, they "act similarly" only in a superficial way, a sort of first impression.

it's probably best not to pay too much attention to it.

Sure.

[domr]

Yeah, I find them too stereotypical. Controlling for mixed subtype probably makes them work more easily ex. a Ti-ISTj would be a cross between researcher and pragmatist in terms of interests, a Te-ENTj same, a Si-ESTj a cross between pragmatist and social, a mixed subtype should fit perfectly the description. I would peg myself as inbetween pragmatist and researcher, even if I shun both super nerdy activities and (bleah) sport cars gatherings.

Why haven't you left like everyone else in this thread?

[FDG]

Why haven't you left like everyone else in this thread?

Why don´t you go fuck your wife?

[domr]

Why don´t you go fuck your wife?

15k posts n u havent learnd anything in the last 10 yrs. SAD!

[FDG]

15k posts n u havent learnd anything in the last 10 yrs. SAD!

Yeah teach me then. What should I learn specifically?

[domr]

The proper names for the clubs are:

Imaginative Ethicists - The Theocrats
Observative Logicians - The Bureaucrats
Imaginative Logicians - The Technocrats
Observative Ethicists - The Utilitarians

[FDG]

The proper names for the clubs are:

Imaginative Ethicists - The Theocrats
Observative Logicians - The Bureaucrats
Imaginative Logicians - The Technocrats
Observative Ethicists - The Utilitarians

Yeah, not gonna use them, sorry. You can create your own website if you want to force other members to use a specific language.

[domr]

Yeah, not gonna use them, sorry. You can create your own website if you want to force other members to use a specific language.

I'm not forcing anything. It's your choice whether you want to understand the philosophers or if you want to spend another 10 years and not learn anything, beside's Gulenko's next crazy DCHNXYZ+- 2.0 theory. It should be obvious that all real research into socionics died years ago, that's why I asked you why you haven't left like everyone else.

[FDG]

I'm not forcing anything. It's your choice whether you want to understand the philosophers or if you want to spend another 10 years and not learn anything, beside's Gulenko's next crazy DCHNXYZ+- 2.0 theory.

i´m the greatest antagonist on this forum regarding DCNH. Maybe you should try looking for allies instead of ranting around and insulting people like a raging teenager. You´re not going to gain acceptance in the scientific community with this type of behavior. Justmy2c.

[domr]

i´m the greatest antagonist on this forum regarding DCNH. Maybe you should try looking for allies instead of ranting around and insulting people like a raging teenager. You´re not going to gain acceptance in the scientific community with this type of behavior. Justmy2c.

You started it by insulting me. And this community isn't science.

[FDG]

You started it by insulting me.

??? You asked me why I didn´t left?

[domr]

??? You asked me why I didn´t left?

Yes and you insulted me instead of answering my question.

[FDG]

Yes and you insulted me instead of answering my question.

Yeah now call your mom and get her to call my mom and I will be reprimanded.

[domr]

Yeah now call your mom and get her to call my mom and I will be reprimanded.

PM me your #.

[Bertrand]

Yeah now call your mom and get her to call my mom and I will be reprimanded.

this is legit funny as hell, kudos

[Sol]

Gulenko's next crazy DCHNXYZ+- 2.0 theory

i´m the greatest antagonist on this forum regarding DCNH.

comrades, no heresies will stay
Let the Reason be with you!

> You´re not going to gain acceptance in the scientific community with this type of behavior.

"scientific community" *sigh*