Integral Type of Humanity

[Empire]

What is the dominant personality type of humanity?

My preliminary conclusion is ESFP

[Empire]

[Empire]

[Brilliand]

Perceptions of mankind vary widely. Each quadra will have their individuals who think that everyone is that quadra. Really, all of the types are human types; if you want to talk about the personality distinction between humans and, say, deep-sea bacteria, you'll have to introduce a Theta quadra.

[Empire]

Perceptions of mankind vary widely. Each quadra will have their individuals who think that everyone is that quadra. Really, all of the types are human types; if you want to talk about the personality distinction between humans and, say, deep-sea bacteria, you'll have to introduce a Theta quadra.

We are talking about human culture and the dominant personality in the culture. If you do not know anything about humans you should try the bacterial forums

[DirectorAbbie]

What is the dominant personality type of humanity?

My preliminary conclusion is ESFP

It would seem so. Based on my data, the most populous types are SEEs, followed by ESEs then IEEs. However, one must remember that the more introverted a person is, the less likely they are to participate in such a poll. This terribly skews the results.

[Capitalist Pig]

We are talking about human culture and the dominant personality in the culture. If you do not know anything about humans you should try the bacterial forums

But should he post in the eukaryote or prokaryote sub-forum?

[Galen]

lol@gamma being dominant in the world

[Skeptic]

It would seem so. Based on my data, the most populous types are SEEs, followed by ESEs then IEEs. However, one must remember that the more introverted a person is, the less likely they are to participate in such a poll. This terribly skews the results.

Theoretically types who are more extraverted would be on the whole more noticed, especially one such as an SEE who is focused on making 'impact' and being the center of attention. This creates the illusion that they are more numerous, but honestly I think the world is mostly introverted.

lol@gamma being dominant in the world

feels good man

[Brilliand]

We are talking about human culture and the dominant personality in the culture. If you do not know anything about humans you should try the bacterial forums

Humanity isn't a culture... it's a species, with thousands or millions of cultures, depending on how you count them. (I make this distinction because a person when born doesn't necessarily have a particular culture... it isn't inherent to the species, but rather, each member of the species happens to be born into one or another.) If you want to talk about the "world culture," which would likely mean either politics or international business, then I would consider EIE, SEE and LIE the likely types. However, there are also such international things as science and medicine that would probably have a Researcher club integral type.

[Khola aka Bee]

But should he post in the eukaryote or prokaryote sub-forum?

Eukaryote if he's talking humans

[Empire]

Theoretically types who are more extroverted would be on the whole more noticed, especially one such as an SEE who is focused on making 'impact' and being the center of attention. This creates the illusion that they are more numerous, but honestly I think the world is mostly introverted.

Well Aristotle said that humans are the social animal, meaning that in his opinion humans prefer to act in groups. Solitary humans are very rare, even monks live in groups. Only hermits are truly solitary, and there are only a few of them. Most human pastimes involve groups, parties, sports, concerts, malls, etc.

[Airman]

From the chart you posted, Empire, we can see clearly that humans are going back to monkeys. We already live sitting in front of computers. Our bones and structure is going to adapt and in some time we´ll no longer be able to stand upright anymore.

This proves that a new humanity must be created. ****** tried it but failed in lots of points. Many philosophers have been saying this.

Humanity is actually in my opinion unfortunately dividing in two groups: those who are going back to a bestial state, similar to primitive aboriginal tribes, and those who are going to become supermen, something beyond mediocre humanity, beings who will become lords over nature and themselves, and ultimately over death even, a whole new mindset.

[Satan]

[717495]

Nah man they're going to combine computers with sleep number beds. That will suffice until we get anti-gravity.

[Empire]

Humanity isn't a culture... it's a species, with thousands or millions of cultures, depending on how you count them. (I make this distinction because a person when born doesn't necessarily have a particular culture... it isn't inherent to the species, but rather, each member of the species happens to be born into one or another.) If you want to talk about the "world culture," which would likely mean either politics or international business, then I would consider EIE, SEE and LIE the likely types. However, there are also such international things as science and medicine that would probably have a Researcher club integral type.

I think that humans have a pretty standard culture with local variations. Many rituals are very similar across all humans communities, such as marriage, government, taxes, religious rituals, farming, manufacturing, education, sports and games, music, theater, stories and story telling, commerce, and so forth. Most of these activities are group activities. Most rely on a high degree of emotionality. Most are highly disorganized and irrational, without a clear method, and carried on an ad hoc basis, as things come along, suggesting a perceiving attitude. I do not get the impression that humans are very intuitive, in fact most most seem to lack that almost completely.

Hence my preliminary conclusion of ESFP.