Type a word list

[Minde]

Actually, type two of them. (And, for all you jokers, I mean the socionics kind not the keyboard kind.)

Each word/point is a different person's short or one-word description of an individual. I realize that an accurate typing is not likely this way, but I'm still interested in any general ideas or directions, particularly in regards to the first one.


The first one -

• Constructive
• Thorough
• Goal-oriented
• Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
• Constructive energy
• Integrity and strength, a servant
• Moving
• Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
• Capable, challenging
• Inquisitive
• Take-charge

The second one -

• Patience
• Gentle
• Focus - always looking at how to better direct [people]; knowing this life is temporary and focussed on what matters
• Serious, having a sense of wonder
• Responsible, comfortable to be with, willing
• Friendly
• Sweet - even though the word is overused, it applies
• Kindness
• Thoughtful, analytical, willing
• Gracious, patient
• Graceful

[munenori2]

Sorry, my brain cells are faltering! Do you mean assign a type to either list (1st one xxxJ, 2nd one Ixxx, etc) or like go through each term and assign types that fit with it or something wholly wacky and different and probably simpler than I'm interpreting at the present moment?

[Minde]

Sorry, my brain cells are faltering! Do you mean assign a type to either list (1st one xxxJ, 2nd one Ixxx, etc) or like go through each term and assign types that fit with it or something wholly wacky and different and probably simpler than I'm interpreting at the present moment?

The bolded.

Each list describes one person. What type do you think that person might be based on the descriptive terms?

[munenori2]

For some reason both descriptions sound delta to me (you must be testing me!) and I don't know if that's due to the describer (though as you say, these be many people) or the described. The first one makes me think in some respects of ISTp (though a few bullet points seem inconsistent), the second seems slightly more clear to me as an ENFp or at least delta NF. Maybe ISFj might work, but hmmmmm.

Argh! I'm wrong again! What is your favorite color? Blue, no yellow!!!!

[Ezra]

Actually, type two of them. (And, for all you jokers, I mean the socionics kind not the keyboard kind.)

Each word/point is a different person's short or one-word description of an individual. I realize that an accurate typing is not likely this way, but I'm still interested in any general ideas or directions, particularly in regards to the first one.


The first one -

• Constructive
• Thorough
• Goal-oriented
• Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
• Constructive energy
• Integrity and strength, a servant
• Moving
• Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
• Capable, challenging
• Inquisitive
• Take-charge

The second one -

• Patience
• Gentle
• Focus - always looking at how to better direct [people]; knowing this life is temporary and focussed on what matters
• Serious, having a sense of wonder
• Responsible, comfortable to be with, willing
• Friendly
• Sweet - even though the word is overused, it applies
• Kindness
• Thoughtful, analytical, willing
• Gracious, patient
• Graceful

This sounds to me like Te ego and Fi ego respectively.

[Minde]

For some reason both descriptions sound delta to me (you must be testing me!) and I don't know if that's due to the describer (though as you say, these be many people) or the described. The first one makes me think in some respects of ISTp (though a few bullet points seem inconsistent), the second seems slightly more clear to me as an ENFp or at least delta NF. Maybe ISFj might work, but hmmmmm.

Argh! I'm wrong again! What is your favorite color? Blue, no yellow!!!!

I'm not trying to test you (though I suppose you could call the second a control of sorts).

Funny video, btw.

tbh I thought the first list sounded like an LSE.

This sounds to me like Te ego and Fi ego respectively.

Well.

That's interesting...

Does anybody else think the first sounds Te ego or LSE/SLI, specifically?

[Expat]

Does anybody else think the first sounds Te ego or LSE/SLI, specifically?

The first one sounds LSE; there's a flavor of > there.

The second one seems specifically EII.

[Minde]

And suspicion moves toward confirmation. I might have had a dual under my nose this whole time.

The first one sounds LSE; there's a flavor of > there.

And EJ over IP? I really can't see the IP in this person. And, hm, yeah, is more apparent than , I think.

The second one seems specifically EII.

No comment.

[Expat]

• • Constructive
  • Thorough
  • Goal-oriented
  • Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
  • Constructive energy
  • Integrity and strength, a servant
  • Moving
  • Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
  • Capable, challenging
  • Inquisitive
  • Take-charge

Those are more likely to be readily associated to an EJ than to an IP.

[Minde]

Actually, it was EJ that was easiest for me to determine from RL observation. Well, that or IJ. Rationality for sure.

[Joy]

ESE for the first (EJ, positivist). EII for the second (IxFx in any case, but not ESI).

The second is more likely rational I would think. I suppose extroversion could be possible, especially is the person is a Ne/Si type.

[Minde]

ESE for the first (EJ, positivist). EII for the second (IxFx in any case, but not ESI).

The second is more likely rational I would think. I suppose extroversion could be possible, especially is the person is a Ne/Si type.

Why ESE for the first?

[UDP]

Does anybody else think the first sounds Te ego or LSE/SLI, specifically?

Yeah.... right away I thought LSE - EII.

And suspicion moves toward confirmation. I might have had a dual under my nose this whole time.

Oh really? Good for you. Was he hiding on you?

[UDP]

The first one -

• Constructive
• Thorough
• Goal-oriented
• Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
• Constructive energy
• Integrity and strength, a servant
• Moving
• Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
• Capable, challenging
• Inquisitive
• Take-charge

Seem familiar? http://www.the16types.info/types.php?typename=ESTJ

[Minde]

Oh really? Good for you. Was he hiding on you?

Yes, really. Maybe. She, and no.

[Minde]

Seem familiar? http://www.the16types.info/types.php?typename=ESTJ

No. Which is part of the... problem, I guess.

[Joy]

Why ESE for the first?

Sounded like a positivist. The only thing that was clear was EJ, and seemed Si > Ni.

[UDP]

No. Which is part of the... problem, I guess.

Oh really... hmm

Expand upon this perhaps?


What is the problem, or what don't you see?

[munenori2]

@ your avatar, UDPicstealer!

FWIW, the cat's name happens to be Maximus Decimus Maritius (Gladiator). So I guess you could say it's fitting.

Also, I have to admit my first instinct was also LSE and EII, but sometimes I flat out go against my gut feelings. That usually turns out poorly, but as I mentioned earlier, I was suspicious!

[UDP]

The funny thing is, I didn't change my avatar. I think it is some sort of a bug with the forum.

[munenori2]

Conspiracy!!

[Minde]

Oh really... hmm

Expand upon this perhaps?


What is the problem, or what don't you see?

It's not really a problem. Sorry, poor choice of words.

I think it might be a case of too close to the forest to see the trees, or however that saying goes.

[UDP]

I think you mean

"A case of being too close to the tree to see the forest"; that is, being too close to something all the time and seeing it only in one perspective, as opposed to backing off and getting a wider view.

[Minde]

Actually, type two of them. (And, for all you jokers, I mean the socionics kind not the keyboard kind.)

Each word/point is a different person's short or one-word description of an individual. I realize that an accurate typing is not likely this way, but I'm still interested in any general ideas or directions, particularly in regards to the first one.


The first one -

• Te Constructive
• Si, Te Thorough
• depends on a goal, but i suppose Se is here (mobilization in part) Goal-oriented
• Te Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
• valued Te Constructive energy
• Se, Fi, Ni, Fe Integrity and strength, a servant
• a process so a dynamic function Moving
• Si strong, Ni likely unvalued weak Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
• Se, Ne Capable, challenging
• Ne Inquisitive
• Se Take-charge

The second one -

• Ni Patience
• Si Gentle
• ? Focus - always looking at how to better direct [people]; knowing this life is temporary and focussed on what matters
• Ne, etc. Serious, having a sense of wonder
• ego-normalized, Si, etc. Responsible, comfortable to be with, willing
• Fe level 2+Friendly
• Si, F Sweet - even though the word is overused, it applies
• Fi Kindness
• Ti, etc.Thoughtful, analytical, willing
• Si, Ni Gracious, patient
• if consciously, depends on motive. i think the deliberate attempt is implemented with Si brain sector as people in "grace" (99.9999999etc%) track out their sensations to check if they are still feeling so intricately special i think.

• Te Constructive
• Si, Te Thorough
• depends on a goal, but i suppose Se is here (mobilization in part) Goal-oriented
• Te Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
• valued Te Constructive energy
• Se, Fi, Ni, Fe Integrity and strength, a servant
• a process so a dynamic function Moving
• Si strong, Ni likely unvalued weak Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
• Se, Ne Capable, challenging
• Ne Inquisitive
• Se Take-charge

Te xxxx
Si xx
Se xxxx
Ne xx
Ni xx
Fi x
Fe x

sounds E and J, T, S, which is also my guess.

Dee, are you trying to tell me something? Because I have no idea what you're saying.

I think you mean

"A case of being too close to the tree to see the forest"; that is, being too close to something all the time and seeing it only in one perspective, as opposed to backing off and getting a wider view.

Yeah. Something like that. Close enough.

The first is a Si-EJ -- I lean strongly towards LSE but I can see where Joy is coming from.

The second is a description of Minde (and is, in any case, EII).

I probably should have left out the second one. It's not like I need any more confirmation. But I guess it didn't hurt anything. Like I said, I mainly wanted input on the first. I've been unsure for awhile and this was a good opportunity...

Hm.

[Kristiina]

Actually, type two of them. (And, for all you jokers, I mean the socionics kind not the keyboard kind.)

Each word/point is a different person's short or one-word description of an individual. I realize that an accurate typing is not likely this way, but I'm still interested in any general ideas or directions, particularly in regards to the first one.


The first one -

• Constructive
• Thorough
• Goal-oriented
• Simple - looking at things for what they're worth, always knowing how to handle them
• Constructive energy
• Integrity and strength, a servant
• Moving
• Caring - getting upset about things not being planned or working properly is a sign of caring
• Capable, challenging
• Inquisitive
• Take-charge

The second one -

• Patience
• Gentle
• Focus - always looking at how to better direct [people]; knowing this life is temporary and focussed on what matters
• Serious, having a sense of wonder
• Responsible, comfortable to be with, willing
• Friendly
• Sweet - even though the word is overused, it applies
• Kindness
• Thoughtful, analytical, willing
• Gracious, patient
• Graceful

First sounds either LSE or LSI.
The second sounds IEI. Could also be IEE.

[Minde]

After noticing this person (the first) work for over a half-hour on minutely trimming and adjusting some expensive insoles interjected by obsessive testing via pacing and accompanied by muttered commentary to herself -

Me: "You really like comfortable shoes, don't you?"
Her: "Oh, my goodness, yes!"
Me: *decides that wisdom lies in not interrupting further*
Her: *continues for another ten minutes then appears to be slowing down*
Me: "Did you get it right?"
Her: "No... *grumbles a little* I hope so. *launches into a detailed description/story of what exactly is happening inside the shoe*"


I'm not sure how much more cliché one can get than that. Still isn't conclusive evidence, though...

[UDP]

ANYTHING that I really like, basically, is like that - It can be a very meticulous process. You don't want to spend your money on something that isn't worth it, or bring it back, or get something of lower quality than you really ought to have. Especially if you have a clear standard or idea in your head of how well something is capable of working.

The only exception is if I know exactly what I want and all I have to do is find it. If I have to make it or decide between things, the testing period can be excruciating... I've had people get really bored sometimes when they are waiting for me to select the best choice out of a few options. It is easy to lose sight of the time factor.