Is true?

[xerx]

...

[Logos]

Why do you end your starting thread posts with "discuss" as if somehow we would not discuss it were it not for being given your explicit permission to do so?

[xyz]

um, im gonna need a bit more explanation on:

f(x) = mind-object interface
a = ergonomic potential

What do you mean "ergonomic potential"? how does this relate to a "mind-object" interface?

[Logos]

You just answered your own question.

No, I didn't.

[marooned]

I drew a picture:



I switched the x and y variables and took various "liberties."

I'm still thinking.

I like this thread.

[Ezra]

f(x) = mind-object interface
a = ergonomic potential

lim f(x) = socionics type
x->a

It's a very positivist notion I guess.

discuss.

Moderator, niffweed has two accounts.