Results 1 to 36 of 36

Thread: worst typology EVER (offensive)

Threaded View

  1. #1
    machintruc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Posts
    3,252
    Mentioned
    5 Post(s)
    Tagged
    0 Thread(s)

    Angry worst typology EVER (offensive)

    This material may shock you. Read with caution.

    http://www.leadership-international.ltd.uk/Process1.htm

    It's the least ethical typology I ever seen. Even "classical" typology is better.

    It's a politically correct way to define 6 types of people :

    1. Rigid narrow-minded machines (some caricature of E1)
    2. Overly sensitive cry-babies (some caricature of E2)
    3. Superficial success-oriented winners (some caricature of E3)
    4. Autistic unassertive do-nothings (some caricature of E5)
    5. Impulsive over-stimulated retards (some caricature of E7)
    6. Aggressive pushy rednecks (some caricature of E8)

    That really sounds like discrimination. I don't even have a type here. That's totally retarded. I mean, it's a typology that measures if you're a winner or a loser.

    The relational model doesn't even work !!!

    I mean, some psychologists or other human sciencists always tell what they feel we want to hear. It's a prototypical E3 behaviour. They are conformist liars. Only the most weak-minded left-wingers people can agree with such a retarded theory. Using such retarded caricatures seriously really disgusts me.

    For example, the Management style :

    Workaholic : Democratic
    Reactor : Benevolant
    Persister : Democratic
    Rebel : Laissez faire
    Dreamer : Autocratic (receives)
    Promoter : Autocratic

    "(receives)" ??? seriously ??? All types are able to lead but the "Dreamer" !?? It's like when you say only E3's or E8's are able to lead. I really prefer when someone say it's only ENFJ's. At least they are cool people. Threes and Eights aren't.

    You see ? Even Eysenck's typology is better. PCM lacks logical consistency.

    Maybe I'll create my own model, with only two types :

    - Outgoing Type (non-ILI's) 93.75% of people
    - Shy Type (ILI's) : 6.25% of people

    At least it'd be better than this piece of s**t, because it wouldn't lack boldness or straightforwardness.

    You know, 18954217 years ago, I was a retarded fish-frog. That's basically the same thing.

    You know, I'm shy, and I can't expect love or friendship from others. I can't even expect to have a social life or a work.

    BTW, I have known a very awesome SEI +-- girl which suffered all her life because she was too weak-minded (hence, Pavlov's weak type). Don't be weak-minded. Go seek and boldly defend the truth. PRAISE CHRIST.

    EDIT: Censored unrespectful things

    EDIT2: I think Kahler was SEE.
    Last edited by machintruc; 01-19-2008 at 06:45 PM.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •