I'm still wanting to say EII.
One quality that you have consistently shown is being able to see and recognize exceptions to the rule, which you have pointed out in almost every question you've answered that I've asked.
"Yes, but when ____ is the case, then ..."
"Partially, but there are times when ____ "
"I don't know because on one hand ____, and on the other hand ____."
I don't think an
strong type would have divergent thought like that.
In my opinion
focuses on bringing things more into focus and converging to a point. You would take these kind of unknowns or exceptions and sort of recognize that they are probably weighted less, but the drive towards a point isn't really hindered. I think that
is more about divergent paths and being able to see things like exceptions to the rule and considering other related points before coming to a conclusion.
That's not to say that
isn't about not coming to an eventual conclusion. (I mean, after all, you are wanting to know what your type is.) It just means that coming to a conclusion requires a certain level of comfort about the information.
This whole typing process of yours kind of illustrates this. When one thing seems to look like it might fit, something over there looks like it might fit as well. Or the thing you are trying fits, but maybe doesn't feel like it completely fits you, so it looks like you look at other things to compare how other things fit.
See what I mean? In my eyes, that's what seems to be going on just through this process. And that's why I don't think you have a
base, because you really do consider exceptions and other factors to a given situation before you can draw your own conclusion.