It's funny that hitta thinks everyone who is an ILI isn't, and that he certainly is

[Ezra]

Dogma.

[Gilly]

Actually I think he fancies himself LII.

[Ezra]

I'm more likely to agree with that.

Okay, he's a bit 'x is x because I say x is x' for a Ne creative, but it's far more likely than ILI.

[Hitta]

Dogma.

Nice post, although it doesn't make sense because I consider myself to be INTj.

[Ezra]

As I said, I can roll with that more than ILI. Fair dooze, hitta.

[aestrivex]

just accept that hitta is a flaming moron and try to ignore him.

[Gilly]

just accept that hitta is a flaming moron and try to ignore him.

+1

[Hitta]

and why exactly am i a flaming moron?

[Suomea]

Ok so on Hitta's type. I'd like to hear arguments for why people think that he isn't INTp. It seems like he's very Ni focused to me at least. If I were to make a guess at his type I probably would say INTp, but I guess INTj, and ISTj are also all possibilities I suppose. It seems like his focus is on continuing down a path that he has already chosen. The end point is already certain but all the steps inbetween just need to be filled. It seems like he does pick up patterns which no one else sees (though these patterns are very well false). I don't see as much adherence to logic... though he has a grasp of it at some level. He doesn't present his arguments in logical Ti fashion and is not pursuaded by other people's Ti as much as an INTj would I think. Ti dominants will normally spell out "this is because of this is because of this." It could be a different type of Ti then I'm used to I suppose, but his Ti just never makes sense. He obviously has a failure in the Fe department...now whether this is Fe seeking or Fe POLR is yet to be determined. I would definitely guess the later though. He also seems very self focused..... INTp-Heavy Ni is my guess.